Second Book of Kings

← Encyclopedia

The Second Book of Kings opens on a story already in motion. A king of Israel falls through the latticework of his upper room and, instead of inquiring of the God of Israel, sends to ask the oracle of a foreign god whether he will recover; the prophet Elijah intercepts the messengers on the road and turns them back with a sentence of death. There is no introduction, no roster of characters, because none is needed: the book is the second half of a single long narrative that the oldest tradition counted as one work with First Kings, divided only later. The split is editorial, not thematic. In the Hebrew tradition Kings was a single scroll, Sefer Melakhim; the two-fold division came in through the Greek, where Samuel and Kings together were rendered as the four Books of Reigns (Basileion), passed into the Latin Vulgate, and entered printed Hebrew Bibles only in the sixteenth century. Second Kings therefore begins exactly where a copyist’s knife happened to fall — in the middle of a sentence the whole work has been speaking since the conquest of the land.

Elijah taken up in a chariot of fire as Elisha looks on (2 Kings 2), the scene from which Second Kings proceeds; oil on canvas by Giuseppe Angeli, c. 1740–1755 — National Gallery of Art, Washington, via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 / public domain)

The Elisha cycle

Its first chapters belong to Elisha, Elijah’s chosen successor, who receives a double portion of his master’s spirit as Elijah is taken up in a whirlwind and a chariot of fire. What follows is a cycle of wonders unlike anything else in the historical books: a body of stories closer in texture to legend than to chronicle, gathered around a single holy man and the disciples — the “sons of the prophets” — who travel in his orbit. Elisha purifies a poisoned spring at Jericho with a bowl of salt. He multiplies a widow’s last jar of oil until it fills every borrowed vessel in the house and pays her debt. He promises a son to the wealthy woman of Shunem who has built him a room, and when the child dies of a sudden pain in the field, he stretches himself over the small body until the warmth returns and the boy sneezes seven times and opens his eyes. He renders a pot of poisoned stew harmless, feeds a hundred men from twenty barley loaves with food to spare, and makes a borrowed axe-head float to the surface of the Jordan.

The longest and most carefully shaped of these is the healing of Naaman, the commander of the army of the king of Aram, a great man and a leper. Sent by an Israelite slave-girl’s word to the prophet, Naaman arrives in state and is met not by Elisha himself but by a messenger, who tells him to wash seven times in the Jordan. The commander is offended — the rivers of Damascus are cleaner than all the waters of Israel — and turns away in a rage, until his servants reason with him: had the prophet asked some great thing, would he not have done it? He goes down into the river and comes up with flesh like a child’s. The episode turns the book’s central question outward: it is the foreigner, not the king of Israel, who confesses that there is no God in all the earth except in Israel, while Elisha’s own servant Gehazi, chasing after Naaman’s refused silver, is struck with the leprosy the Aramean has just shed.

Read on the book’s own terms, the wonders are not ornament. They establish that the word of the Lord, carried by the prophet, commands life and death, harvest and famine, the bodies of the sick and the outcomes of war — the same authority the kings will be measured against and found, again and again, to have defied. The prophetic stories and the regnal chronicle are two halves of one argument about where power finally resides.

The chronicle of reigns

After Elisha anoints Jehu and recedes from the foreground, the book becomes a chronicle of reigns, and its method tightens into a formula. Each king of the two kingdoms is introduced with his accession synchronized to the reign of his counterpart across the border, the length of his rule, and — the load-bearing clause — a verdict: he did what was right, or what was evil, in the eyes of the Lord. The standard is single and unwavering. For the northern kings the verdict is always condemnation, every one of them held to walk in the sin of Jeroboam, who made Israel to sin; for the southern kings the measure is the Temple in Jerusalem and the destruction of the rival hilltop shrines, the “high places,” which most of even the good kings fail to remove. Worship in the wrong place, or of the wrong god, is the hinge on which a reign is judged, and the political fortunes of the kingdom are read off that judgment.

Two episodes carry the most weight. Jehu’s revolt is the book’s great purge: anointed in secret by one of Elisha’s disciples, he drives furiously to Jezreel, kills the kings of both Israel and Judah, has Jezebel thrown from a window, and exterminates the whole house of Ahab and the priests and worshipers of Baal, whom he gathers into their own temple under false pretenses and slaughters. The narrative both approves the zeal — the dynasty had brought the Phoenician Baal cult into Israel — and quietly marks its excess; Jehu himself does not turn from the sins of Jeroboam, and the blood of Jezreel is later charged against his line.

The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III, 9th century BC, from Nimrud; its second register records tribute from Jehu of Israel — British Museum, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The second is reform. Hezekiah of Judah trusts in the Lord, removes the high places and the bronze serpent that had become an object of incense, and is delivered when an Assyrian army stands at his walls.

Assyrian troops assaulting the Judahite city of Lachish, from the palace reliefs of Sennacherib at Nineveh, depicting the 701 BC campaign against Hezekiah’s kingdom — British Museum, photo Mike Peel, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

A century later Josiah, during repairs to the Temple, has a book of the law discovered in the house of the Lord; when it is read to him he tears his clothes, for the kingdom has not been keeping its terms. Josiah purges the shrines from one end of the land to the other, defiles the altar at Bethel, slaughters the priests of the high places, and keeps a Passover such as had not been kept since the days of the judges. The recovered scroll — long identified by scholarship with some form of the law of Deuteronomy, the only book whose demand for a single sanctuary matches Josiah’s program — makes the reform the theological summit of the whole work and the standard by which everything before it is retroactively judged.

The double catastrophe

The reforms do not save the kingdoms. The northern kingdom of Israel falls first: its capital Samaria, after a three-year siege, is taken by the armies of Assyria, and its population deported and scattered across the empire, foreign peoples settled in its place. The book pauses here for its longest sermon, a chapter explaining the fall as the cumulative sentence for two centuries of unfaithfulness — the one passage where the narrator steps fully out of the story to state the law that governs it. Judah survives more than a century longer, through Hezekiah’s deliverance and Josiah’s reform, but the reprieve is read as already spent: Josiah is killed at Megiddo, his successors slide between Egyptian and Babylonian masters, and the end comes from the east. Nebuchadnezzar’s armies take Jerusalem, carry off its king and its skilled men, and at last burn the city and the Temple to the ground, breaking down the walls, carrying away the bronze and the vessels, and killing or exiling what remains. The kingdom of David is over.

And then, in four verses that have puzzled and consoled readers ever since, the book closes not on the burning but on a meal. In the thirty-seventh year of the exile a new king of Babylon lifts up the head of Jehoiachin, the captive king of Judah, brings him out of prison, speaks kindly to him, gives him a seat above the other kings at court, and a daily allowance for the rest of his life. It is a small mercy at the bottom of a long descent, and the only door the book leaves open: the line is not extinct, the captive eats at a table, and the narrative ends with a fact rather than a promise. The Hebrew of these closing chapters, with parallel Greek and English versions, is hosted in full at the Sefaria edition of II Kings.

A Neo-Babylonian ration tablet recording provisions issued to Ya’u-kīnu (Jehoiachin), captive king of Judah, and his household — Pergamon Museum, Berlin (VAT 16378), via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The history as theodicy

Scholarship reads Kings as the close of the Deuteronomistic History, the long account running from Deuteronomy through Joshua, Judges, and Samuel into these books, shaped by editors who explained the loss of land and Temple as the consequence of a broken covenant. The proposal belongs in its modern form to Martin Noth, whose 1943 study argued that the whole stretch was the work of a single exilic compiler who selected and framed older sources to demonstrate that the disaster was deserved. Later scholarship has complicated the single hand without abandoning the design. Frank Moore Cross proposed a double redaction — a hopeful Josianic edition composed during the reform of the late seventh century, with its optimism intact, revised after the catastrophe by an exilic editor who added the passages explaining why even Josiah’s faithfulness could not avert the end. The Göttingen school of Rudolf Smend and his students traced instead successive exilic layers, a historian’s draft overwritten by prophetic and law-centered revisions. The debate is over how many hands and when, not over the governing idea, which the book states plainly: the ruin was a verdict, and the verdict was just.

Several of the regnal events the book reports are independently attested in the royal inscriptions of Mesopotamia, and the convergences are striking enough that Kings is among the most externally corroborated narratives in the Hebrew Bible. Jehu, or his envoy, appears bowing before Shalmaneser III on the Black Obelisk excavated at Nimrud, labeled “son of Omri” in the Assyrian dynastic shorthand for the kingdom of Israel — the earliest known image of a named Israelite king.

Detail of the Black Obelisk: a figure identified as Jehu, or his envoy, bowing before Shalmaneser III — the earliest known depiction of a named Israelite king — British Museum, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Sennacherib’s annals, on three surviving clay prisms, record the campaign of 701 against Hezekiah and boast of shutting the king up in Jerusalem like a bird in a cage, conspicuously not claiming the city’s capture — the same outcome the book reports as a deliverance. And the book’s final scene has its own footnote in clay: administrative tablets recovered from Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon, published by Ernst Weidner in 1939, list rations issued to Ya’u-kīnu, king of the land of Yāhudu, and his sons — Jehoiachin and his household, drawing their daily allowance in exile, exactly where the last verses leave them. The standard critical commentary, Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor’s II Kings (1988), reads the regnal narrative against precisely this Akkadian record, tracing the points where the chronicle and the cuneiform meet.

For the traditions that received it as scripture — and Kings stands among the Former Prophets of the Tanakh and in the historical books of the Christian Old Testament — the book is something more than a record of defeat. Its companion volume of grief, Lamentations, weeps over the burned city; Kings explains it. The destruction is set down so that it can be understood, the covenant and its violation laid out so the catastrophe reads as the working of a moral order and not the silence of an absent or defeated god. It is the account of how a people understood their own ruin as judgment rather than accident, and the explanation is itself the consolation. The history is told so that the disaster might be made to mean something.

→ Related: First Book Of Kings · Book Of Zephaniah · Book Of Zechariah · Mesopotamia · Deuteronomy · Babylon · Assyria · Joshua · Lamentations · Old Testament · Tanakh · Prophecy