Sadducees

← Encyclopedia

The Sadducees were one of the principal parties of Second Temple Judaism: a faction drawn largely from the priestly and landowning aristocracy of Jerusalem, bound to the Temple and its cult, and remembered above all for what they denied. Their name probably derives from Zadok, the high priest under David and Solomon, whose line claimed the senior priesthood — though the etymology is not certain, and the party’s own account of itself does not survive.

That last point governs everything that can be said about them. No Sadducean writing has come down; what is known comes entirely from others, and mostly from people who disagreed with them. The historian Josephus, himself of priestly descent but sympathetic to their rivals, supplies the fullest sketch. The Gospels and Acts show them in conflict with early Christians. Later rabbinic literature, the heirs of their opponents, preserves polemic against them. Each source carries its own slant, and the modern picture is assembled from these refracted images rather than from anything the Sadducees said in their own voice.

On the reports that survive, three positions defined them. They accepted as binding only the written Torah, rejecting the body of unwritten tradition that the Pharisees held to carry equal authority — the oral law that would later become the rabbinic inheritance. They denied the resurrection of the dead and, by Josephus’s account, the survival of the soul after death; reward and punishment, on their view, belonged to this life. And they pressed a stricter literalism in legal interpretation, sometimes harsher in penalty than their rivals. These commitments set them against the Pharisees on matters at once theological and political, and the New Testament preserves the memory of that divide in the scene where Sadducees question Jesus about whose wife a woman will be in a resurrection they do not accept.

Their power was the Temple, and it did not outlive it. As the party of the priestly establishment, the Sadducees were closely tied to the Temple’s sacrificial system and to whatever accommodation could be reached with Rome. When the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70 CE, the institution that gave the Sadducees their standing was gone, and the party effectively vanished from history. Judaism’s surviving line ran instead through the Pharisees and the rabbis who succeeded them, which is part of why the Sadducees are known so largely through the words of those who outlasted them.

How far the surviving sources can be trusted remains an open question. Josephus cast the Jewish parties in terms his Greek and Roman readers would recognize, describing them almost as philosophical schools differing over fate and the soul; how much that framing distorts a movement that was as much a social class as a doctrine is debated. What is reasonably firm is the shape of the disagreement: a Temple-centered priestly elite, confident in the written law and unconvinced by the newer hope of the dead rising, set against the parties whose answer to that hope would carry the tradition forward.

→ Related: Priest · Ezra · Religion