Rudra

← Encyclopedia

Rudra is the fierce archer-god of the early Vedic hymns: lord of the storm and the untamed margins of the world, feared for the arrows that scatter sickness among men and cattle, and entreated, in the same breath, for the remedies that take it away. The hymns of the Rigveda address him warily. He stands apart from the orderly gods of the settlement and the sacrifice, a power of the mountains and the wilderness whom the worshipper would rather have facing away.

Three whole hymns of the Rigveda are given to him — RV 1.114, 2.33, and 7.46 — and his name surfaces in scattered verses elsewhere, a smaller portion of the collection than falls to the great settlement gods. Where Indra drinks the pressed soma and smashes the dragon to release the waters, where Agni carries the offering up from the householder’s hearth, and where Varuna keeps the cosmic order and the binding oath, Rudra belongs to no settled station. His haunts are the slopes and the forests, the rough country beyond the ploughland. In the later ritual codes the difference is built into the offerings themselves: where the bright gods receive the cooked oblation at the fire within the village, Rudra is given the bali, the portion set out and away — a pap of gavedhukā grain, the blood of the victim laid on leaves for him and his host — at rites performed outside the settlement, often before dawn. He is the god of the leftover and the boundary, served at arm’s length.

The name itself is uncertain, and the ancient commentators already disagreed — some derived it from a root meaning to howl or roar, fitting the storm, others from one meaning to redden or to make weep. Yāska, the early etymologist of the Nirukta, and the Vedic commentator Sāyaṇa both offer clusters of derivations rather than a single one; Sāyaṇa is reported to thread together as many as six, turning on the verb rud-, “to cry” — Rudra as the one who weeps, or who makes others weep. A separate line of modern scholarship, associated with Richard Pischel and Hermann Grassmann, reads the name from a lost root for “red” or “ruddy,” even “shining” — Rudra the brilliant, the tawny one. Stella Kramrisch, working from the related adjective raudra, “wild,” renders him simply the wild god. The disagreement is not a failure of the record so much as a property of the figure: every plausible reading — the howler, the weeper, the one who makes weep, the red one, the wild one — names something that is actually in the hymns.

The hymns give him a double face that the rest of his history never loses. He is the divine healer, the foremost of physicians, holding “a thousand remedies,” and he is the bringer of the very afflictions those remedies cure; the one who is begged not to strike children, men, horses, or herds. RV 7.46 asks him plainly not to lay his sickness on the offspring, and the supplications return, hymn after hymn, to the same anxious arithmetic: spare the sons, spare the fathers, spare the cattle, turn the shaft elsewhere. He wears his hair braided and coiled — kapardin, the god of the matted lock, already in RV 1.114, an image that will travel intact into the later ascetic. Reverence toward him is largely the wish that his violence pass by. What is asked of Indra is victory and of Agni is presence; what is asked of Rudra is mercy, which is to say restraint.

Out of that wariness grew his most consequential trait: the habit of calling him by names he might prefer to hear. Worshippers addressed him as śiva — “auspicious,” “kindly” — not as a description but as an appeasement, the euphemism offered to a dangerous power in hope of its gentler aspect. The great litany known as the Śatarudriya, the litany of the hundred forms of Rudra, preserved in the Yajurveda — in chapter sixteen of the Vājasaneyi Saṃhitā of the White recension, and in the Taittirīya Saṃhitā of the Black — heaps such epithets upon him, naming him in his every guise. Within a single sweep of the hymn he is hailed as lord of thieves and of robbers on the road, of the forest and of trees, of the field and the threshing-floor, of paths and crossroads, of the arrow and the bow, and of the healing herbs; the dreadful and the kindly forms are invoked side by side, the worshipper begging the terrible shapes to be laid aside and the benign ones turned toward him. The word śatarudriya itself means the hymn of the hundred Rudras — the one god scattered into a hundred powers so that none of them is left unaddressed.

His kin in the Rigveda are the Maruts, the storm-troop: the host of young warriors who ride the thunderheads, born of Rudra and the dappled cow Pṛśni, called in the hymns the Rudras, his sons. They are his violence multiplied and made plural — the wind made into an army — and they bind him, through the storm, to the same atmospheric world that the rain and the lightning belong to. Through them his fierceness is given a face that is not only the lone archer on the ridge but a company in motion across the sky.

That euphemism became a name, and the name became a god. Over the long passage from the Vedic world to classical Hinduism, Rudra and Śiva fused: the auspicious title hardened into the proper name of one of the supreme deities of later worship, and the archer of the wilderness was carried forward as an aspect of the god of destruction and regeneration, the ascetic lord of the mountain. The continuities are concrete and traceable. The bow and the arrow remain his; so does the matted hair of the kapardin; so do the high and lonely places; so, above all, does the ambivalence — the single power that both destroys and restores, that holds the disease and the cure in one hand. The three-eyed form invoked in the Tryambaka verse of the Rigveda (RV 7.59.12), a prayer for release that the later tradition would make one of its most repeated, is read backward as already the Shiva to come. The developed lord of Hinduism — the destroyer among the great gods, set beside Vishnu the preserver — carries the Vedic Rudra inside him as the oldest of his layers.

How that relation is named depends on where one stands. Read as history, it is a development across more than a millennium: a marginal storm-and-disease god of the Saṃhitās, addressed by a placating epithet, gathered over centuries into the classical deity, the figures linked by real and traceable continuities of attribute without being simply the same across the span that separates them. Read from within the living tradition, the order is reversed, and the relation is identity rather than evolution: Rudra is Śiva, the name and the form two disclosures of one god, the terror and the grace held together in a single being, the Vedic hymns and the classical worship two voices addressing one presence across time. Both framings work the same material — the same bow, the same mountains, the same double hand of harm and healing — and the encyclopedia holds them side by side without ruling between them.

Texts, translations, and scholarship

The Rigvedic Rudra is read today chiefly through Ralph T. H. Griffith’s complete verse rendering, The Hymns of the Rigveda (Benares, 4 vols, 1889–1892; rev. 1896), long the standard free-text Rigveda and the version through which most English readers meet RV 2.33 and RV 7.46. Griffith (d. 1906) is in the public domain in every relevant jurisdiction. H. H. Wilson’s earlier Rig-Veda Sanhita (London, 1850–1888), following the medieval commentator Sāyaṇa, supplies the indigenous exegetical reading of the same hymns against Griffith’s verse. The most consequential single text of the Rudra cult, the Śatarudriya, reaches English through Griffith’s The Texts of the White Yajurveda (Benares, 1899), chapter sixteen, and through Arthur Berriedale Keith’s The Veda of the Black Yajus School, entitled Taittiriya Sanhita (Harvard Oriental Series 18–19, 1914), the only complete English Black-Yajus and the witness for the litany’s other recension.

The synthetic scholarship begins with Arthur Anthony Macdonell’s Vedic Mythology (1897), which fixed the figure’s profile — the archer, the kapardin, the father of the Maruts, the healer of a thousand remedies, the god addressed by the appeasing śiva — for the comparative tradition that followed. The fullest single study of the development from Vedic Rudra to classical Śiva is Stella Kramrisch’s The Presence of Śiva (Princeton, 1981), which reads the wild god forward into the great deity. J. Bruce Long’s essay Rudra as an Embodiment of Divine Ambivalence in the Satarudriya Stotram argues against reading the Vedic Rudra as a merely demonic terror, treating the litany’s heaped opposites — destroyer and healer, lord of thieves and lord of herbs — as the very fluidity that allowed his elevation to a supreme god. The broader textual settings of the Rigveda, Yajurveda, and Atharvaveda carry the apparatus of the cult, the Atharvan in particular preserving the disease-and-remedy register in which Rudra’s double hand is most at home.

The god one most wanted turned away became the god to whom the soul was told to turn.

→ Related: Gandharva · Rigveda · Yajurveda · Hinduism · Shiva · Indra · Agni · Soma · Varuna · Maruts · Historical Vedic Religion · Vishnu · Brahman · Deva · Yama · Atharvaveda · Bhakti Movement