Reformed Christianity

← Encyclopedia

Reformed Christianity is the branch of Protestantism that traces its descent from the Swiss Reformation of the early sixteenth century — from Huldrych Zwingli at Zurich and, above all, from John Calvin at Geneva. It is one of the two main families of Christianity to emerge from the Protestant break with Rome, the other being the Lutheran; the names “Reformed” and “Calvinism” are used for it almost interchangeably, though the tradition is older and wider than any one man. It is best understood as a current within the larger Reformation that took its bearings less from a single founder’s biography than from a settled instinct about where the weight of God’s action falls — wholly on God’s side, never on the creature’s.

The Swiss origin matters because it gives the family two heads rather than one. Zwingli, the people’s priest at the Grossmünster in Zurich, had arrived at an evangelical reform of his own around 1519, independently of Wittenberg and on somewhat different ground; he pressed harder and faster than Luther against the inherited furniture of medieval worship, stripping images, organs, and the Mass-as-sacrifice from the city’s churches and reading Scripture as the sole warrant for what a congregation might lawfully do. After he fell in battle against the Catholic cantons at Kappel in 1531, leadership of the Zurich church passed to Heinrich Bullinger, whose long pastorate and vast correspondence held the Swiss reform together while a younger French exile gave it its system. Calvin reached Geneva in 1536 and, after a brief expulsion, governed its religious life from 1541 until his death in 1564, building the disciplined commonwealth from which preachers were sent out across Europe. From these twin Swiss centers — Zurich and Geneva — and not from Wittenberg, the Reformed churches drew their descent.

The break with Luther, and the Supper

The split from Martin Luther was not over the core Protestant claim that a person is justified by faith rather than by works. On that they agreed, and agreed emphatically: justification by faith alone, on the authority of Scripture alone, through grace alone, was the common inheritance of the whole Reformation. The Reformed and the Lutherans divided over other questions, and most sharply over the Lord’s Supper. Luther held that Christ is bodily present in the bread and the wine, the words this is my body taken at their plainest; Zwingli took the meal as a remembrance and a sign, the bread signifying a body absent in heaven rather than contained in the elements. The two camps met at Marburg in 1529, in a colloquy called by Landgrave Philip of Hesse who wanted a common confession to underpin a Protestant alliance. They drew up fifteen articles and found themselves agreed on fourteen; the fifteenth, on the Supper, they could not close, and the meeting broke up without reconciliation. The failure fixed a boundary that has lasted: Lutheran and Reformed remained, and remain, two families rather than one, and the line first drawn at Marburg over the bread and the cup has never been wholly erased.

Reformed teaching on the Supper did not stay where Zwingli left it. Calvin worked out a position between Luther’s bodily presence and Zwingli’s bare memorial: a true presence, but a spiritual one, in which the believer is lifted by the Holy Spirit to feed on the ascended Christ rather than Christ being drawn down into the elements. In 1549 Calvin and Bullinger sealed this account in the Consensus Tigurinus, the Agreement of Zurich, which bound the Swiss churches to a single doctrine of the sacraments and made the Reformed view, rather than Zwingli’s older memorialism, the family’s settled teaching. The sacrament, on this reading, is a real means by which God offers Christ to the elect — not an empty token, not a magical conduit, but a sign that does what it signifies in the soul that receives it in faith.

The sovereignty of God

What gives the tradition its distinctive temper is the stress on the sovereignty of God. Reformed theology teaches that God’s will is the first cause of all that happens — the world is not a mechanism left running but a kingdom continuously governed — and it draws from this the doctrine of predestination: that salvation rests on God’s eternal choice rather than on any human merit or decision. The teaching was not invented at Geneva. It runs back through Augustine of Hippo, who fought it out against Pelagius over whether the will could turn toward God unaided, and behind Augustine to Paul’s letter to the Romans, where the potter shapes the clay as he wills. What the Reformed did was refuse to soften it. If grace is everything, they reasoned, then nothing in the saved soul earned it and nothing in the lost soul could have changed the verdict; and the same eternal decree that elects some passes others by. The thought was meant less to terrify than to console — a believer who could claim no merit might rest entirely on a God who would not change his mind — but it has unsettled readers in every generation, and Calvin himself, who set it out in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, named the harder edge of it a decree that fills the mind with dread.

The Institutes is the tradition’s architectural text. Calvin first printed it at Basel in 1536 as a slim catechism of six chapters and enlarged it across his life into the definitive Latin edition of 1559 — four books and some eighty chapters, moving in order from the knowledge of God the Creator, to the knowledge of God the Redeemer, to the way grace is received by faith, to the outward means God uses to gather and keep his people. The order was the point. Where his contemporaries argued doctrine in fragments, Calvin set out to make the whole of it hold together, each part following from the last; the result became the most influential single work of the second Reformation generation and the spine of Reformed theology for centuries. Yet the system kept moving without him. Later divines built scholastic structures on his foundations, and historians have long debated how much of what is called “Calvinism” Calvin himself would have recognized — covenant theology, with its scheme of an eternal covenant of redemption and successive covenants of works and grace, is largely the work of his heirs rather than of his own pen.

Dort and the five points

The hardest test of the doctrine came not in Geneva but in the Dutch church a generation after Calvin’s death. Jacobus Arminius, a theology professor at Leiden, had come to doubt that predestination was unconditional; after his death in 1609 his followers laid before the States General a remonstrance in five articles, teaching election grounded in foreseen faith, a Christ who died for all, a grace that could be resisted, and a salvation that could be lost. The quarrel between these Remonstrants and their stricter opponents grew political enough to bring down a statesman, and it was settled at the Synod of Dort, which sat at Dordrecht from November 1618 to May 1619 — sixty-two Dutch delegates and twenty-seven from eight foreign churches, the only international synod the Reformed family ever held. Its Canons answered the five Remonstrant articles point for point with five heads of doctrine: unconditional election, a redemption particular to the elect, the total inability of the fallen will, a grace that cannot finally be refused, and the perseverance of the saints to the end. These were the points of doctrine that English-speaking writers would much later compress into the formula now remembered as the five points of Calvinism — a twentieth-century acrostic, never the synod’s own ordering and never Calvin’s, but a fair enough skeleton of what Dort decided. The Canons took their place beside two earlier statements already in Dutch use, the Belgic Confession of 1561 and the Heidelberg Catechism of 1563, to form the three confessional standards of the continental Reformed churches.

Worship and church order

The tradition also reshaped worship and church order, and here its instinct was to do only what it took Scripture to warrant — the principle, later called regulative, that whatever the Word does not command in worship is forbidden, where the Lutherans more readily kept whatever the Word did not forbid. The result was a stripped service: plain interiors swept of images and altars, preaching of the Word set at the center where the Mass had stood, and congregational singing not of hymns of human composing but of the Psalms themselves, versified into the metrical psalters — the Genevan, and after it the Scottish and the English — that became the sound of Reformed devotion. In place of bishops the Reformed developed forms of government that lodged authority in elders and assemblies. The presbyterian order runs the church through graded courts of ministers and lay elders — the local session, the regional presbytery, the synod, the general assembly — while the congregational order vests it in the gathered local congregation itself; both refuse the threefold medieval hierarchy of bishop, priest, and deacon, and both read the offices of the New Testament church as a charter for rule by the many rather than the one. Calvin’s Genevan Ecclesiastical Ordinances of 1541, with their four offices of pastor, doctor, elder, and deacon, supplied the working model the international family carried outward.

The spread

From Geneva the movement spread fast, and unlike Lutheranism, which stayed largely within the German and Scandinavian lands, the Reformed faith proved portable across very different states. In France its adherents were the Huguenots, who organized a national church on the presbyterian pattern at their first synod in 1559 and endured nearly four decades of civil war — the slaughter of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre of August 1572, the brittle toleration of the Edict of Nantes in 1598, and the final blow of its revocation in 1685, which scattered the surviving Huguenots across Protestant Europe and the wider world. In the Netherlands the Reformed church became the public faith of the Dutch Republic, its theology fixed at Dort and its universities, Leiden chief among them, the engine of Reformed learning for two centuries. In Scotland the preaching of John Knox, who had studied in Geneva and called it the most perfect school of Christ since the apostles, carried the Reformed pattern home; the Scottish Parliament established the reform in 1560, the Scots Confession was drawn up in the same year, and the Church of Scotland — the Kirk — became the presbyterian establishment of the nation. From Scotland and from English Puritanism the family crossed to the New World with the Puritan settlement of New England, whose congregational churches and covenant theology shaped the religious cast of early America. The Westminster Assembly, sitting in London through the 1640s, produced in the Confession of 1646 and its two catechisms the fullest and most influential of the Reformed standards in English, which remains the subordinate standard of the Presbyterian churches and binds the Scottish, English, and American strands into one confessional family.

The Weber thesis and the question of worldly effects

Reformed Christianity has long drawn attention beyond theology for its supposed worldly effects. Max Weber’s argument that the Calvinist ethic — the anxious discipline of a believer who could read his election in the diligence of a worldly calling — helped form the spirit of modern capitalism remains among the most debated claims in the social sciences. Set out in Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus of 1904–05, it was proposed as historical explanation, contested ever since, and easy to overstate: critics have noted that capitalism flourished in Catholic cities before Calvin and that the predestinarian who took Dort seriously had no theological reason to read prosperity as proof of grace. What is not in doubt is the tradition’s reach: a stern and closely reasoned account of God and human dependence that organized churches and shaped peoples across four continents.

Texts, confessions, and scholarship

The doctrinal spine of the family is its confessions, and they are public and exact. The continental standards — the Belgic Confession (1561), the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), and the Canons of the Synod of Dort (1618–19) — together form the Three Forms of Unity; the Anglophone standard is the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) with its Larger and Shorter Catechisms. The foundational systematic text remains Calvin’s Institutes; the standard modern critical English edition is the two-volume translation by Ford Lewis Battles, edited by John T. McNeill (Westminster Press, 1960), while the older public-domain translations by Henry Beveridge and John Allen keep the work in wide circulation, the Beveridge text hosted with the principal Reformed confessions at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library.

The modern scholarship divides between the historical and the dogmatic. For the broad sixteenth-century narrative, Diarmaid MacCulloch’s Reformation: Europe’s House Divided, 1490–1700 (Allen Lane, 2003) is the standard one-volume synthesis (publisher record). The single most thorough social and institutional history of the Reformed family in particular is Philip Benedict’s Christ’s Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism (Yale University Press, 2002), which traces the tradition from Zurich and Geneva across every land it reached. On the development of the doctrine itself, Richard A. Muller’s four-volume Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics (Baker Academic, 2003) is the reference work for the way the early Institutes hardened into the confessional scholasticism of the seventeenth century, and Alister McGrath’s A Life of John Calvin (1990) remains a standard account of how the reformer’s thought was shaped. For the Weber debate, the Talcott Parsons translation of the Protestant Ethic is the most widely circulated English text (full text), and the long argument over it has become a field in itself within the social sciences.

A neighboring distinction

Among the Christian families the Reformed stand closest to the Lutheran, with whom they share the whole Protestant inheritance and differ chiefly over the Supper, the decree, and the order of worship; further off lies Eastern Orthodox Christianity, whose sacramental and iconographic piety the Reformed regulative principle rejects most thoroughly of all. The warmer, inward currents of Protestant devotion — the Pietism that grew up partly in reaction to confessional rigor, the Protestant mysticism that flowered where the official Reformation had grown coldest — define themselves in part against the austerity of the Reformed temper. And the name “Christian Science,” sometimes confused with it by the unwary, belongs to a separate nineteenth-century American movement founded by Mary Baker Eddy (Christian Science) with no descent from Geneva and no share in its doctrine of the decree — a reminder that the Reformed family is defined not by a word but by a lineage, the one that runs from Zwingli’s Zurich and Calvin’s Geneva through Dort and Westminster into every church whose confession opens on the sovereignty of God and the election of grace.

→ Related: Communion · Psalms · Reason · The Reformation · John Calvin · John Knox · Martin Luther · Lutheran Paracelsian Reform · Grace In Christianity · Christianity · Jesus Christ · Bible · Protestant Mysticism · Pietism · Eastern Orthodox Christianity · Christian Science