Puja

← Encyclopedia

Puja is the act of honoring a deity through offerings made before its image or symbol — the central rite of devotional Hinduism, performed from the small shrine in a home corner to the long temple liturgies of major sanctuaries. The word is Sanskrit, of disputed derivation; what it names is older and steadier than its etymology: the giving of welcome and service to a god treated, for the duration of the rite, as an honored guest who is present.

“Puja Performed at a Temple of Shiva,” oil on canvas, 1804 — Thomas Daniell (1749–1840), National Trust (Stourhead), via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The name resists its own roots. Paul Thieme, in 1939, traced pūjā to the Sanskrit pṛc, “to mix,” reading it back to the madhuparka — the mingling of honey and water set before a distinguished visitor in the older guest-rite, so that puja would be, at base, the hospitality owed to one who arrives. Others have looked outside Sanskrit altogether, to a Dravidian pū, “flower,” the characteristic offering held in the hand. Natalia Lidova has pressed the harder case: that pūjā has no secure Indo-Aryan root and no cognate elsewhere in the Indo-European family, and so reaches the Vedic vocabulary from outside it, carrying with it a manner of worship the fire-religion did not originate. The disagreement is not idle. It marks the rite as a thing that came into the inherited language already formed, named for what was done in it — the mixing of the welcome-draught, or the flower laid down — rather than derived from a root idea and elaborated afterward.

The deity as guest

That premise is what organizes the gestures. A deity installed in an image is held to be genuinely there, and so receives what a distinguished visitor would receive — to be bathed, dressed, fanned, offered flowers and incense, food and water, and a flame circled before it in the gesture called arati. The grammar is the grammar of hospitality: the god is called to come (āvāhana), given a seat, washed and clothed and fed as a household honors the atithi, the guest who arrives unannounced and must be served before any question of who he is, and at the close released again to depart (visarjana). The single most studied schema is the ṣoḍaśopacāra, the sixteen upacāras or “attendances” — invitation, seat, water for the feet, the welcome-offering, the bath, fresh garments, sandal paste, flowers, incense, the lamp, the presented food, and the rest — which a full temple sequence performs in order and which, as Gudrun Bühnemann’s study of the smārta rite (1988) sets out, contracts or expands with the occasion. A household puja may take minutes; a great temple liturgy can run to hours, with priests reciting Sanskrit formulae over each act and the image attended through a whole day as a king is attended, woken, robed, fed, and put to rest.

The image itself is not, in this understanding, a likeness pointing elsewhere. A mūrti is made the deity’s body by a rite of installation — prāṇa-pratiṣṭhā, the setting of breath or life within it — after which it is no longer stone or bronze or painted clay but a divine person, kept and served as one. Richard Davis, in Lives of Indian Images (1997), describes exactly this: priests enliven the image by a ritual establishment that invokes the god into a material support, and thereafter priests and devotees sustain it as a living being through unbroken liturgical care. To neglect such an image is not to let an ornament gather dust but to abandon a guest one has bound oneself to keep.

Darshan and prasada

The offerings are presented and then, frequently, returned to the worshippers as prasāda, food the god has touched and given back — so that the gift completes itself not in the giving but in the return, the worshipper receiving from the deity’s own portion what he first brought. At the rite’s heart lies darśana, “seeing”: the worshipper beholds the deity and is beheld in turn, a mutual sight that practitioners count among the chief ends of going to a temple at all. Diana Eck’s Darśan (1981) made the point central to the Western reading of the tradition — that to “take darshan” is to stand within the deity’s gaze as much as to direct one’s own, the eyes of the image opened and, at consecration, ritually given sight, so that the encounter is a meeting of looks and not the inspection of an object. The open, outsized eyes of so many Indian images are not a stylistic habit but the instrument of the rite. C. J. Fuller, whose study of popular Hindu worship takes its title from the camphor flame of the arati, observes that in the moment the lit camphor is circled and then passed among the gathered, who draw its warmth toward their own eyes and brow, the boundary between worshipper and worshipped is briefly dissolved: the flame that has shown the god shows the god in the worshipper as well.

The lamp circled in the arati: the evening Ganga arati at Dashashwamedh Ghat, Varanasi — Wikimedia Commons contributor, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Range, codification, and the temple

Forms vary widely, and the variation is itself old. The classical jurists sorted the rite by occasion — nitya, the daily worship owed without prompting; naimittika, the puja attached to a particular day or feast; kāmya, the optional rite undertaken for a desired end — and the same image might receive any of them. At the small end stands the lamp lit each morning before a shelf of pictures; at the great end, the deity of a major sanctuary served by a hereditary priesthood according to manuals — the āgamas and paddhatis that fix the order of acts down to the gesture, so that the worship of a famous image is at once a domestic hospitality and a court ceremonial conducted by professionals. The festival is the rite enlarged rather than a different thing: the Bengal autumn Durga Puja, in which a clay image is made, served across its days, and given back to the river, is the same architecture of welcome, service, sight, and leave-taking written across a community and a calendar.

The clay image of Durga and her family enshrined for the festival — Durga Puja at FD Block, Salt Lake, Kolkata, 2013 — Biswarup Ganguly, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)

The displacement of sacrifice

Scholarship has traced the rite’s long displacement of the older Vedic sacrifice, the yajna of fire and oblation that stood at the center of the Vedic religion, though the relation between the two is debated and puja’s image-centered, theistic shape is not simply derivable from it. The fire-sacrifice was an act without an image and, in its grandest forms, without a temple: offerings poured into a built flame and carried upward, a transaction conducted by sound and combustion. Puja is its near inversion — a god made present and visible in a fixed body and waited upon where it stands. The shift is visible in the historical record. Image worship and the building of permanent temples gathered force under royal patronage in the centuries after the Mauryas and reached institutional weight in the Gupta period (roughly the fourth to sixth centuries), as the devotional turn of bhakti gave the cults of Vishnu, Shiva, and the Goddess their enduring shape. Phyllis Granoff has called the correlation of yajña and pūjā one of the most intricate problems in Indology: the two were set against each other within the tradition itself, and the task of reconstructing how one yielded to the other is a matter of finding the ritual logic each shared rather than reading a simple succession. Michael Willis’s work on the Gupta charters shows the temple endowed and its offerings fixed in epigraphy precisely as this older sacrificial economy is folded into the service of an enshrined god. What can be said plainly is that puja became the ordinary form of Hindu worship, while the fire-rite contracted to specialist and domestic survivals — not erased, but no longer the floor the religious life is built on.

Beyond the served god

The structure of welcome, offering, and sight carries across the differences, and it migrated with the religious cultures that adopted it. Buddhist traditions, in particular, took up pūjā for offerings before the Buddha, the relic, the stupa, and the bodhisattvas, where the framing shifts at its root: there is no god installed and no guest to serve. The flowers, the lamps, the incense set before the image honor one who has passed beyond reach, and the act bears its fruit not as a service rendered to a present being but as merit (puṇya) accruing to the giver, the image and the relic standing as supreme fields in which generosity yields its return. From the placing of flowers, lights, and incense before a symbol of the Buddha — the early form preserved in the southern schools — to the elaborate offering-liturgies of the Mahayana and the deity-rites of the Vajrayana, including the Newar tradition in which Hindu and Buddhist puja have run together for centuries, the same borrowed grammar serves an end the original premise did not require. The comparison repays attention precisely because the gesture is one and the metaphysics two — a point of long interest to the comparative study of how a single ritual form can carry incompatible accounts of what it accomplishes.

Scholarship

The modern study of puja runs from the description of living practice to the reconstruction of its history. C. J. Fuller’s The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India (Princeton University Press, 1992) is the standard ethnographic account of the rite as it is actually performed, organized around the act of worship and the society it expresses; the Cambridge review record documents its reception across the field (Modern Asian Studies review). Diana L. Eck’s Darśan: Seeing the Divine Image in India (Anima Books, 1981; third edition Columbia University Press) (publisher page) made the seeing-and-being-seen at the rite’s center legible to a non-Indian readership and remains the most-cited short treatment of the visual logic of Hindu worship. Gudrun Bühnemann’s Pūjā: A Study in Smārta Ritual (Publications of the de Nobili Research Library XV, Vienna, 1988) is the close textual analysis of the upacāra sequence as the manuals prescribe it. For the image as a living person, Richard H. Davis’s Lives of Indian Images (Princeton University Press, 1997) traces the consequences of installation across the biographies of particular sculptures. On the historical relation to sacrifice, Phyllis Granoff’s “The Changes of Indian Ritualism: Yajña versus Pūjā,” in Archaeology and Text: The Temple in South Asia (Oxford University Press, 2009) (text), and Michael Willis’s “The Formation of Temple Ritual in the Gupta Period” (text), set the emergence of temple puja within the epigraphic and ritual record of the Gupta age. The earliest Sanskrit witnesses to the worship the manuals later fixed lie scattered through the Upanishadic and Āgamic corpus; the Tantric texts edited in the early twentieth century preserve much of the Śākta image-liturgy in print.

Across all of it the logic is constant, whatever the metaphysics laid over it: hospitality raised to a sacrament: the god received as a guest, and seen in return.

→ In the library: Woodroffe — Mahānirvāna Tantra (1913) · Avalon — Hymns to the Goddess (1913) · The Upanishads (Müller, SBE I & XV)

→ Related: Mahabodhi Temple · Itsukushima Shrine · Hinduism · Durga Puja · Yajna · Historical Vedic Religion · Buddhism · Buddha · Deity · Incense · Bhakti Movement · Hindu Tantra · Newar Vajrayana · Comparative Mysticism