Pietism

← Encyclopedia

In the spring of 1675 a Frankfurt pastor wrote a short preface to a new edition of old sermons and, almost without meaning to, named a movement. The pastor was Philipp Jakob Spener; the sermons were the postils of the earlier devotional writer Johann Arndt; and the preface, expanded and printed on its own, became Pia Desideria — “Pious Desires.” Its premise was a complaint lodged from inside the house rather than at its gate. The Reformation had won its arguments and fixed its confessions; the Lutheran church of Spener’s day knew exactly what it believed and could prove it against all comers. What it had not done, in his reading, was reform the people who recited those confessions. Doctrine had been settled. Lives had not been changed.

Pietism is the renewal movement that grew from that complaint — the current within German Lutheranism, dated from 1675, holding that true Christianity is a matter of the reborn heart and a transformed life rather than of correct doctrine alone. It was a protest of the faithful against their own church’s coldness, not a secession from it. Spener did not want a new confession; he wanted the existing one to come alive in the people who held it.

The church Spener addressed was the church of Lutheran orthodoxy in its high confessional age — a Christianity that had spent the century after Luther hardening the Reformation’s insights into a rigorous system, defended in disputation against Catholics, Calvinists, and one another with the fine instruments of scholastic theology. Spener did not deny that this work was needed or that it was true. He held, rather, that it had become an end in itself, that the energy of the church had drained into controversy, and that the ordinary congregation had been left a spectator to its own religion. He was not the first to say so. He drew openly on an older devotional tradition — above all on Johann Arndt, whose True Christianity (Wahres Christentum, from 1605) had already pressed the same case for a faith of the inner man — and behind Arndt on the medieval German mystics Arndt himself had read. Spener’s originality lay less in the diagnosis than in the program he attached to it.

Spener’s three remedies

Pia Desideria set out a six-fold program, and three of its proposals became the movement’s working signature. The first was the conventicle: small gatherings in private houses where lay men and women read Scripture together, prayed, and spoke about the conduct of the Christian life. Spener had begun holding such meetings in Frankfurt around 1670 and called them collegia pietatis, “colleges of piety” — the phrase from which the movement’s name would later be derived. Their premise was that the Word of God belonged in lay hands and lay mouths, not only in the pulpit and the lecture hall.

The second remedy was the renewal of the spiritual priesthood — the Lutheran doctrine of the priesthood of all believers, which Luther had proclaimed and the established church had quietly let lapse into a clerical monopoly. Spener pressed it back into active use: every Christian, not only the ordained, bore responsibility for the faith of neighbors, for instruction, admonition, and the care of souls. The third was a reform of preaching. The sermon was to aim at the conscience and the inner man — at edification, at the awakening and nurture of living faith — rather than at the display of learning or the prosecution of doctrinal controversy. Around these stood the rest of the program: that Christianity is practiced more than it is argued, that love and patience should govern even religious disputes, and that the training of ministers should cultivate piety as much as scholarship.

The label itself arrived as an insult. Pietist began as a jeer from opponents who distrusted these private meetings — suspecting in the house-gatherings a church within the church, a self-appointed elite of the truly converted. It stuck, and the people it named came to wear it without embarrassment, the way a slur outlives the contempt that coined it and turns into a badge.

The taught sequence of the inner life

What the Pietists taught was less a body of new doctrine than an order of experience — a sequence the soul was expected to pass through. It opened in a felt repentance, the Busskampf or “penitential struggle,” in which the nominal Christian came to know his own condition not as a creed to assent to but as a wound to feel. From that struggle came the new birth, the conversion: the moment, sometimes datable, when a person passed from a borrowed religion to a living one and received an inward assurance of grace. After conversion came the visible fruit — sober conduct, plainness of life, charity to the poor, and the steady disciplines of prayer and the reading of the Bible. A faith that altered no behavior was, by this measure, no faith at all.

Doctrine the Pietists did not reject. They subordinated it. The confessions remained true; the difference was that orthodoxy without an altered heart was reckoned dead orthodoxy, correct and lifeless, as useless as a key that fits the lock but is never turned. This is the wager at the center of the movement, and the source of its long quarrel with the scholastic Lutheran establishment, which feared, not without reason, that a religion located in feeling and the renewed self would loosen its hold on the shared and public truth the confessions were written to guard. The Pietists answered that a truth no one lived was not being guarded at all, only embalmed.

That answer placed Pietism in a long and ambiguous neighborhood. Its insistence on a felt union with God beyond the cool assent of the intellect set it close to Protestant mysticism and to the broader history of mysticism within Christianity, and its critics did not fail to make the comparison, sometimes as praise and more often as warning. Yet the mainline Pietism of Spener and Francke kept its distance from the speculative and ecstatic wings of that tradition. It wanted the new birth, not visions; assurance, not absorption into the Godhead. Its mysticism, if the word applies, was a disciplined and biblical one, anchored in the Bible and lived out in the duties of an ordinary calling rather than in the cloister or the trance.

Halle: piety made into an institution

If Spener gave the movement its program, August Hermann Francke gave it a body. A younger man who had passed through his own dramatic conversion, Francke became the dominant figure of the second generation and made the new university at Halle the movement’s engine. Beginning in 1695 he built around himself a complex of institutions that turned inward piety into a machinery of works: an orphanage, a free school for the poor and a Latin school for the better-off, a teacher training seminary, a printing press and Bible house, a dispensary, and — through all of it — a center for missions. The Francke Foundations grew into the largest social-reform enterprise the Protestant world had seen since the Reformation, and their reach was global; the Halle press supplied Bibles by the hundreds of thousands, and Halle-trained missionaries carried the movement to the Danish trading post at Tranquebar in southern India, the first organized Protestant mission of its kind. In Francke’s hands the converted heart did not retreat into private feeling. It built schools, fed orphans, and printed Scripture.

Herrnhut: a separate strand

A distinct strand gathered at a different center and under a different temperament. Count Nikolaus Ludwig von Zinzendorf, a Saxon nobleman raised in Spener’s own circle, opened his estate in 1722 to refugees of the old Bohemian Brethren fleeing persecution, and the settlement they built was called Herrnhut. On 13 August 1727 the community underwent an experience of unity its members recounted as an outpouring of the Spirit, and they took that date as the renewal of their church — the Moravian Church, the Unitas Fratrum revived. Zinzendorf’s Pietism was warmer and more christocentric than the Halle variety, centered on the wounds and the blood of Christ and on a fellowship that crossed the lines of rank, and it was extraordinarily mobile. Moravian missionaries went out to the Caribbean, to Greenland, to the slaves of the West Indies and the native peoples of North America, planting the movement far beyond Germany and well ahead of any other Protestant body of the age.

Reach: the awakenings, Wesley, and the question of Romanticism

Pietism is one of the formative currents of modern Protestant religion, and its reach runs well past its own borders and language. Its accent on personal conversion and felt assurance fed directly into the evangelical awakenings of the English-speaking world, supplying them with a grammar of the heart they would make their own. The clearest single line is the documented one. In 1736 the young Anglican clergyman John Wesley, crossing to the colony of Georgia, met a company of Moravians whose calm during a storm at sea unsettled him; he had risked his life to convert others and found he could not quiet his own fear. Two years later, on the evening of 24 May 1738, at a religious society in Aldersgate Street in London where someone was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans, Wesley recorded the turning point in his journal: he felt his heart strangely warmed, and received the assurance that Christ had taken away his sins. The phrase has become the founding moment of Methodism. Wesley would later break with the Moravians over doctrine, but the Pietist sequence — penitential struggle, datable conversion, assurance, disciplined fellowship — is written into Methodism’s structure, in its bands and classes as much as in its hymns.

Scholars have long suggested a second, looser line of descent: that Pietism’s inward turn, its cultivation of feeling and the examined self, helped prepare the wider eighteenth-century interest in inwardness that surfaces in Romanticism. The resemblance is genuine and the influence real in the German lands, where Pietist autobiography and the language of the heart were part of the air the Romantics breathed; the connection is argued at length by F. Ernest Stoeffler (1965) and weighed carefully by Dale W. Brown (1996), among others. It is also a descent the movement would not have claimed. Pietism understood itself in strictly Christian terms and would not have recognized the secular uses later made of its vocabulary of feeling, conversion, and the awakened self.

The Württemberg strand and a movement sharing the name

Two clarifications keep the field in focus. The Spener–Francke–Zinzendorf core described here is the churchly Lutheran movement; alongside it ran a more speculative Swabian current, the Württemberg “Pietist theosophy” of Friedrich Christoph Oetinger (1702–1782), which fused Pietist devotion with the cosmology of Jacob Boehme and with Christian Kabbalah. That offshoot belongs to the world of Boehmean theosophy and the older Lutheran-Paracelsian reform rather than to Spener’s program of conventicle and conscience, and is treated as a distinct strand. Separately, the term Pietism is also applied, by historians writing in English, to the Hasidei Ashkenaz — a twelfth- and thirteenth-century Jewish movement of the Rhineland that shares the descriptor and nothing else. It is a distinct movement sharing the name, and the two should never be conflated.

Texts and scholarship

The founding document is Spener’s Pia Desideria (Frankfurt, 1675), available in English in the standard translation by Theodore G. Tappert (Fortress Press, 1964); a concise account of its argument and afterlife is set out by the Christian History Institute. The primary record of the movement’s reach into Methodism is John Wesley’s own journal, of which the entry for 24 May 1738 is the most quoted page; the whole is hosted in the public-domain Journal of John Wesley. The modern scholarly account begins with F. Ernest Stoeffler’s The Rise of Evangelical Pietism (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1965), the volume that set Lutheran Pietism within the broader Reformed and Puritan history of experiential religion and is reissued by Brill; a compact analytic treatment, attentive to what does and does not count as Pietism, is Dale W. Brown’s Understanding Pietism (rev. ed., Evangel Publishing House, 1996). The institutional history is best read through the Halle foundations themselves; for Francke and his enterprise the Leibniz Institute of European History provides a scholarly biographical entry.

The afterlife of a wager

The settled doctrine that Spener took for granted has long outlasted the particular conventicles he founded; what the movement bequeathed was not a new creed but a way of inhabiting the old one. Its descendants are everywhere in Protestant Christianity — in the Moravian mission stations, in Methodist class meetings, in the revival preaching of the awakenings, in every later church that asks its members not merely to believe the right things but to know the hour their hearts were changed. Halle’s orphanage and Herrnhut’s mission fleets are the visible proof of the wager that animated the whole: that a faith felt and lived would build more than a faith correctly held, and that the converted heart, once awakened, would not stay indoors.

→ Related: Religion · Scholasticism · Christianity · Philipp Jakob Spener · John Wesley · The Reformation · Martin Luther · Mysticism · Protestant Mysticism · Lutheran Paracelsian Reform