Pierre Charron

← Encyclopedia

Pierre Charron was a French Catholic priest, preacher, and philosopher whose De la sagesse (1601) recast the loose, exploratory skepticism of his friend Montaigne into an ordered system of moral wisdom. Trained first in law and then in theology, he spent much of his career as a celebrated cathedral preacher in the south of France before turning, late, to writing the books that made his name and his reputation for danger.

The friendship with Montaigne is the hinge of the story. The two men were close in Montaigne’s last years; the elder gave Charron leave to bear his coat of arms, and Charron in turn took up the Essais not as a reader but as an heir, quarrying them for material and reworking their wandering inquiries into something deliberate. Where Montaigne circled, Charron classified. De la sagesse lays out the knowledge of oneself, the passions, and the limits of the human mind as a structured argument, and from that argument draws a rule of life: wisdom is the firm, well-ordered conduct of a soul that has measured how little it can actually know.

That last move is what made Charron suspect. His position was a fideism — the claim that reason cannot reach certainty in the highest matters, so that the truths of religion must rest on faith and authority rather than proof. He defended Catholicism vigorously in an earlier work, Les Trois Vérités (1593), against unbelievers, non-Christians, and Protestants in turn. But the same severance of reason from faith that protected the Church could be read the other way, and many of his contemporaries read it that way: if reason is powerless to establish religious truth, a wisdom and morality built on natural self-knowledge might stand on its own, with belief left to one side. De la sagesse was attacked as a manual for libertines and very nearly suppressed; a softened second edition appeared after Charron’s sudden death in 1603.

Whether Charron was a devout fideist whose orthodoxy was misread, or a quiet freethinker who used the language of faith as cover, has never been settled, and the texts support both readings. Scholarship of early modern thought places him firmly in the revival of ancient skepticism that ran from Montaigne toward Descartes, and treats him as one of the channels by which doubt about the reach of reason passed into the seventeenth century. The drift of his influence, intended or not, ran toward a wisdom that could be stated without appeal to revelation — which is close to the opposite of what a Catholic preacher set out to write.

→ Related: Pierre D Ailly