Phoenicia

← Encyclopedia

A stretch of coast between the sea and the cedar mountains, no more than a few days’ sail end to end, held no single capital and answered to no single king. It held cities — Byblos, Sidon, Tyre, Arwad, Beirut — each on its own promontory or offshore island, each with its own harbor, its own god, its own dynasty, and its own quarrel with the next. From this narrow ribbon, in the early centuries of the first millennium BCE, ships went out to the whole circuit of the Mediterranean and came back with metal; a dye the color of clotted blood went out as the most expensive cloth in the ancient world; and a row of two-and-twenty signs went out and became, in time, nearly every alphabet now in use. The people who did this did not call themselves Phoenicians. That was a Greek word.

Phoenicia is the modern name for the civilization of the Canaanite-speaking city-states of the Levantine seaboard — roughly the coast of present-day Lebanon with stretches of Syria and northern Israel — across the first millennium BCE, from the recovery that followed the Bronze Age collapse down to the conquests of Alexander. It was never a country. There was no Phoenician state, no Phoenician capital, no Phoenician king of the Phoenicians. There were harbors, each its own polity, bound by a shared language, a shared script, shared gods, and a shared livelihood drawn from the sea — and divided, often bitterly, by everything else. To understand the civilization is to begin by giving up the expectation of a center.

The name and the people

The Greeks called them Phoinikes, and from that word descends everything written about them by outsiders. Its root, phoinix, meant the color purple-red — the crimson of the dye their cities sold, so that the purple people and the people of the coast were, in Greek mouths, very nearly the same phrase. Whether the dye named the people or the people the dye is no longer recoverable; the two were fused from the first.

The Phoenicians had no such name for themselves. In their own inscriptions they are men of Tyre, men of Sidon, men of Byblos; their land, where they name it at all, is Canaan, and they are Canaanites — the same word, the same people, as the Bronze Age population the Hebrew Bible calls Canaanite and the Egyptian and Mesopotamian records had known for a thousand years. Phoenician is thus a Greek convenience laid over a people who identified themselves by city rather than nation, and it is genuinely uncertain whether they ever thought of themselves as one people at all. They spoke a Northwest Semitic language close to Hebrew and to the older tongue of Ugarit; they worshipped the gods of Canaan under civic forms; they were the Iron Age continuation of the Late Bronze coastal culture, the survivors of a catastrophe that had swept most of their neighbors away.

That catastrophe is the hinge on which the civilization turns. Around 1200 BCE the eastern Mediterranean world came apart: the Hittite empire of Anatolia dissolved, the palaces of Mycenaean Greece burned, the great trade in Egyptian grain and Cypriot copper faltered, and the Egyptian records speak of marauding seaborne coalitions breaking against the Nile delta. The Levantine coastal cities were battered — Ugarit itself, just to the north, was destroyed and never rebuilt — but the southern harbors, Byblos and Sidon and Tyre among them, came through. Into the vacuum left by the fallen empires they sailed. The Phoenician florescence is, in this sense, the inheritance of a ruined age: a maritime people who survived the collapse of everyone who had previously controlled the sea, and took the sea for themselves.

The cities

Byblos was the oldest, and the most tied to Egypt. For most of the Bronze Age it had been an Egyptian dependency, the port through which the pharaohs drew the cedar of Lebanon for their temples, barques, and coffins; the bond went back to the Old Kingdom and the cedar boats of the pyramid age. When Egyptian power receded in the eleventh century, Byblos stood on its own — and the Egyptian tale of Wenamun, a temple official sent north around 1050 BCE to buy cedar and made to wait, haggled with, and lectured by the prince of Byblos, captures the moment exactly: the Egyptian envoy no longer commands, he negotiates, and the Byblian knows it.

Sidon and Tyre rose after. Tyre, in particular, climbed from a satellite of Sidon to the foremost of the cities under its tenth-century king Hiram, who built it into the head of a trading empire and whose alliance with David and Solomon of Israel — cedar and craftsmen sent south for the building of the Jerusalem temple, in exchange for grain and oil — is recorded in the Hebrew scriptures as the model of a profitable friendship. Tyre’s peculiar strength was geography: the main city sat on an island a half-mile offshore, walled by the sea, all but impregnable to land armies. That island would defy siege after siege for centuries.

The cities were never unified. They competed for the same markets, fought over the same waters, and at moments fell under one another’s hegemony, but no Tyrian or Sidonian ever ruled the coast as a whole. Each was a self-governing harbor-state with its king, its council of elders and merchant houses, its patron deity, and its own colonial reach. What held them together was not a government but a culture — and a trade.

Purple and cedar: the economy of the coast

Two commodities, above all, made the Phoenician name. The first was the dye that gave the people their Greek name: Tyrian purple, wrung from the glandular mucus of murex sea-snails — Hexaplex trunculus and Bolinus brandaris — that the divers raked from the seabed by the boatload. The yield was almost absurdly small; it took something on the order of ten to twenty thousand crushed snails to produce a single gram of dye, and the spent shells piled into mounds outside the dye-works that can still be traced at Sidon, Sarepta, and Tyre. The result was a fast, brilliant, fade-resistant crimson-to-violet that nothing else in the ancient world could match, and that the courts of the Near East, and later Rome, would pay almost any price to wear. Purple became the color of kingship for the same reason it was the color of Phoenicia: because the Phoenicians held a near-monopoly on the only good source, and a pound of double-dyed Tyrian wool could cost more than its weight in silver.

The second was timber — the cedar of Lebanon, which grew in the mountains directly above the ports and which the treeless river-civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia could obtain almost nowhere else. Straight, fragrant, resistant to rot, the cedar built Egyptian temple-roofs and royal barges and Assyrian palace halls; the Phoenician cities sat astride the supply and grew rich as the brokers of it. Around these two staples clustered the rest: fine linen, embroidered cloth, worked metal and glass — the Phoenicians were among the great early glassmakers — carved ivory, wine, and salt fish. And underneath the manufactures lay the deeper trade, the reason the ships ranged so far: metals. Silver, tin, copper, and gold were what the eastern markets craved and the eastern Levant lacked, and the search for them drove Phoenician keels the length of the sea.

The reach west

This is the expansion that built the western Mediterranean. From the tenth and ninth centuries BCE, Phoenician — overwhelmingly Tyrian — ships pushed past the familiar eastern waters toward the metal sources of the far west: the silver of southern Spain, the tin routes of the Atlantic. To service the long hauls they planted way-stations and then full colonies along the route: Kition on Cyprus, Motya off Sicily, posts on Sardinia and Malta and the North African shore, Gades — modern Cadiz — beyond the Strait of Gibraltar that the Greeks would call the Pillars of Herakles, and, greatest of all, Carthage on the Tunisian coast, founded by Tyrian settlers in the tradition dated to 814 BCE.

Carthage — Punic Qart-ḥadašt, the new city — outgrew its parent. As Tyre fell under the weight of the eastern land empires, the center of the Phoenician world drifted westward, and Carthage became an independent power that would rule the western Mediterranean and contend with Rome for it. Its long history, its own pantheon of Baal Hammon and Tanit, and the bitter Punic wars belong to its own account. What matters here is the kinship: Carthage was Phoenicia transplanted, a daughter of Tyre carrying west the same language, the same gods, the same script, and the same genius for the sea. The Phoenician colonial network was the first to knit the whole basin of the Mediterranean into a single web of exchange — and it did so a century or more before the Greeks began their own colonizing age, often arriving first at the very harbors the Greeks would later contest.

The alphabet

The deepest legacy left no monument and weighed nothing. It was the alphabet.

The Phoenicians wrote with a set of twenty-two signs, each standing for a single consonant — a true alphabet of the type linguists call an abjad, with no signs for vowels, which a reader supplied from knowledge of the language. It was small, learnable, and supremely portable, nothing like the hundreds of signs that the cuneiform of Mesopotamia or the hieroglyphs of Egypt demanded of their scribes. Its roots lay in the earlier Canaanite experiments with alphabetic writing in the second millennium; what the Phoenicians did was stabilize it into a fixed, ordered, linear sequence of letters and carry it everywhere their ships went.

The earliest substantial monument of the script is the inscription on the sarcophagus of Ahiram, a king of Byblos, found in 1923 by the French excavator Pierre Montet in a rock-cut tomb of the Byblian royal necropolis and now in the National Museum of Beirut. Its lid carries a curse against any later ruler who would disturb the coffin — already the developed Phoenician alphabet, nineteen of its twenty-two letters present and formed. Its date is genuinely disputed: the traditional reading places it around 1000 BCE, while a school of epigraphers, Benjamin Sass prominent among them, argues for the ninth or even eighth century, in part because securely dated inscriptions from the eleventh century are simply missing — a gap in the record rather than a presence in it. The argument is unsettled and turns on letter-forms, archaeology, and the company the inscription keeps; the debate over the Byblian royal inscriptions remains live. What is not disputed is that by the ninth century the script was fully formed and in wide use, and that its standard of dating worldwide derives, in part, from how one reads this single Byblian coffin.

From the coast the letters traveled. Sometime in the ninth or eighth century BCE, Greeks in contact with Phoenician traders took the script and adapted it to their own very different language — and in doing so made the one decisive change that distinguishes the Greek alphabet from its parent. Phoenician had signs for several consonants that Greek did not use; the Greeks repurposed those idle signs to stand for vowels, so that aleph became alpha, he became epsilon, and the writing of vowels — absent from every Semitic abjad — entered the world. The Greeks themselves remembered the debt: they called their letters phoinikeia grammata, the Phoenician letters, and told the legend of Cadmus, the Phoenician prince who sailed west and brought writing to Thebes. Cadmus is a figure of Greek myth, not of Phoenician record, and the tale should be read as legend rather than chronicle; but it preserves, in story, an accurate memory of where the signs came from.

From the Greek adaptation descend the Latin letters of this page, and the Cyrillic of the Slavic world; from the parent Phoenician stock, by another line, descend the Aramaic script and through it the Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac alphabets, and ultimately many of the writing systems of Asia. Few human inventions have propagated so widely from so small a seed. The cities that launched it were merchants who needed a fast way to keep accounts and seal contracts; what they let loose was the technology by which most of the world would learn to read.

Gods, kings, and the dead

The civic life of each city turned on its god, and the god of a Phoenician city was its other self — its founder, guarantor, and the addressee of its public oaths. Tyre belonged to Melqart, whose name means king of the city, whom the Greeks read as Herakles; Sidon to the healer Eshmun; Byblos to its Lady, the Baalat Gubal. Behind these civic patrons stood the older Canaanite high god El and the storm-lord Baal — baʿal, lord, less a name than a title that attached to many local gods — and the great goddess Astarte, the morning and evening star, whom the Greeks would meet and reshape as Aphrodite. The doctrine and ritual of these cults, the Bronze Age literature that lies behind them, and the long western debate over the urn-fields of the tophet are treated under Phoenician religion and Ugaritic and West Semitic religion; what matters for the shape of the civilization is structural. Religion and citizenship were one fabric. The king was the god’s chief servant in life and joined the honored dead under his protection in death — which is why the most theological texts the Phoenicians left are royal funerary inscriptions, like the Sidonian sarcophagus of Eshmunazar II now in the Louvre, that identify the dead king, record his temple-building, and curse whoever would open the grave.

One Phoenician export passed almost entirely into Greek dress: from the ordinary word adon, meaning lord — the same root as the Baals — the Greeks made the proper name of Adonis, the beautiful dying youth mourned by the women of their festivals. The Greek Adonis is a Hellenized figure, the Semitic title received into a foreign ritual and given a face; he should be distinguished from the Levantine god whose epithet he began as. It is a small case of the larger pattern: the Phoenicians sent their gods west, and the west renamed them.

The land empires and the end of independence

Wealth on a narrow coast invites conquest, and from the ninth century BCE the Phoenician cities lived under the shadow of the great inland powers. Assyria came first and hardest. Ashurnasirpal II reached the Mediterranean and exacted tribute around 868 BCE; his successors made the coast a source of revenue, and the kings of Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, and Arwad paid in silver, cedar, and purple to keep their thrones and their trade. Tiglath-pileser III tightened the grip in 734 BCE; Sennacherib drove out the rebel king Luli of Tyre and Sidon in 701 BCE. The cities learned the arithmetic of survival under empire: pay, keep the harbor open, and outlast the conqueror. Their seaborne wealth made them too useful to destroy and too valuable to free.

After Assyria fell came Neo-Babylonia, and Nebuchadnezzar II’s long siege of island Tyre — by tradition thirteen years — that the city outlasted on terms rather than by surrender. After Babylon came the Persians, and under the Achaemenids the Phoenician cities found their natural place: as the core of the imperial navy, Sidon foremost among them, their galleys and crews the instrument of Persian sea-power against the Greeks. Sidon’s revolt against Artaxerxes III in the 340s BCE was crushed with great slaughter. Then, in 332 BCE, came Alexander.

The siege of Tyre that year is the close of independent Phoenician history. The other cities opened their gates; Sidon went over to the Macedonian and lent him ships. Tyre alone, secure on its island, refused — and Alexander, lacking a fleet to match it, did the thing no previous besieger had managed: he built a causeway out from the mainland, a mole of rubble and timber driven across the half-mile of sea, and brought his siege-towers to the walls. After seven months the island fell, and with it the last Phoenician city to stand alone. The causeway never washed away; it silted into the isthmus that joins Tyre to the shore to this day, so that the island is an island no longer.

What followed was absorption. Under Alexander’s successors and then Rome the cities lived on, prosperous and Greek-speaking, their gods folded into the Greek and Roman pantheons, their purple still the imperial color. Tyre in the Roman centuries became a seat of Greek learning — the second-century Platonist rhetorician Maximus of Tyre bore the city’s name into the schools of the empire, a Greek philosopher of a Phoenician city long since become a Roman one. The Canaanite tongue faded; the civic gods kept their altars under new names; the harbors kept their trade. But the thing that had been distinctly Phoenician — the independent city sworn to its own god and answerable to no land empire — ended on the causeway at Tyre.

Reading a civilization through other people’s pens

Almost everything written about the Phoenicians was written by someone else. They left inscriptions in abundance — vows, dedications, funerary curses — but no history, no literature in their own hand that survives, no account of themselves to set against the Greek, Roman, and Hebrew testimony, which is by turns admiring, hostile, and self-interested. The modern study of the civilization is therefore an exercise in triangulation. The standard general account in English is Glenn Markoe’s Phoenicians (University of California Press, 2000), which treats the coast as a continuous culture across twelve centuries rather than a static Iron Age snapshot. The colonial expansion and its archaeology are mapped in María Eugenia Aubet’s The Phoenicians and the West (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2001), the foundational synthesis of the westward trade-diaspora. The vexed history of the alphabet and its dating is laid out in Benjamin Sass’s The Alphabet at the Turn of the Millennium (Tel Aviv, 2005), the most influential of the low-chronology arguments that the debate over the Byblian inscriptions continues to answer.

For the Greek window onto Phoenician myth, the Phoenician History attributed to Philo of Byblos — preserved only because Eusebius quoted it — is edited and translated by Harold W. Attridge and Robert A. Oden, Jr. (Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 9, 1981); its older companion fragments, in I. P. Cory’s public-domain Ancient Fragments of 1832, are hosted in full at the Internet Sacred Text Archive. The Bronze Age substrate of Phoenician religion — the Canaanite gods, the storm-king Baal, the cult of the royal dead — is recoverable through the alphabetic-cuneiform tablets of Ugarit, whose ongoing edition is cataloged in part through the Persée run of the journal Syria and whose modern transliterations the Göttingen Ugarit-Portal makes openly available. The western funerary controversy — whether the urn-fields of Carthage and the Punic west were burial-grounds or sacrifice-grounds — turns on the dossier debated in Antiquity, including the Carthage tophet exchange of 2013, and properly belongs with the account of Carthage and Phoenician religion.

The cities of the coast are gone — Tyre an isthmus, Sidon and Byblos modern towns, the cedar mountains nearly bare. But the merchants who needed a fast hand for their accounts solved a problem no scribe-empire had cared to solve, and the solution proved larger than the problem. Every letter on this page is a Phoenician sign passed through Greek and Latin hands; the order in which a child still recites the alphabet — a, b, c against aleph, bet, gimel — is the order the dye-merchants set. The twenty-two consonants outran the purple and the cedar, outran the kings and the colonies, and outran even the memory of the people who called themselves not Phoenicians but men of Tyre and Sidon and Byblos. A coast of competing harbors, sworn each to its own god and agreeing on almost nothing, agreed at least on how to write — and that agreement is reading this sentence now.

→ Related: Canaan · Phoenician Religion · Ugaritic West Semitic Religion · Baal · Astarte · Cadmus · Adonis · Carthage · Assyria · Hittites · Mycenaean Greece · Ancient Egypt · Mesopotamia · Maximus Of Tyre