Philosophy

Modern Paganism

The family of twentieth-century movements — Wicca, reconstructionism, Druidry and the Goddess currents — that set out to revive, or reimagine, the pre-Christian religions of Europe and the Near East.

← Encyclopedia

Modern Paganism, also called Neopaganism, is the family of twentieth-century religious movements that set out to revive — or, where the old religions were beyond recovery, to reimagine — the pre-Christian traditions of Europe and the ancient Mediterranean. It is not one religion but a loose field of them, sharing a reverence for nature, a plurality of gods or a divinized cosmos, and a turn toward seasonal and ritual life rather than creed. What binds the strands is less a shared doctrine than a shared gesture: a turning back toward gods and festivals that the long Christianization of Europe had displaced, and a conviction that the sacred is met in the turning year and the living land rather than handed down in a single revealed book.

The field has no founding council, no canon, and no central authority. It is held together by a family resemblance — the eight-festival year, the address of gods in the plural, the rite performed in a circle or a grove rather than read from a pulpit — and by a web of teachers, books, and small initiatory lines that cross-fertilized through the second half of the twentieth century. Its intellectual roots run back through the esotericism and occultism of the nineteenth century, through Theosophy and the Romantic reading of nature, and behind those to the long European fascination with a paganism that Christianity had named and buried but never quite forgotten.

Wicca and the unbroken-lineage claim

The most influential strand is Wicca, made public in England in the 1950s by Gerald Gardner (1884–1964), a retired colonial civil servant, customs officer, and amateur folklorist who had spent his working life in Ceylon and Malaya before settling near the New Forest. In Witchcraft Today (1954) he announced that he had been initiated, in 1939, into a surviving coven of an old witch-cult — the so-called New Forest coven — and that what he was now able to describe was the last living remnant of a pagan Old Religion that had run underground beneath Christian Europe for centuries. The book carried an introduction by Margaret Murray, the Egyptologist whose scholarship supplied its claimed pedigree, and it framed Wicca as recovery rather than invention.

The claim of an unbroken lineage does not survive scrutiny. Textual and historical work — above all Ronald Hutton’s The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft (Oxford University Press, 1999; revised second edition 2019), which calls Wicca the only religion England has ever given the world — has shown that what Gardner assembled was, in the main, new. Its parts are identifiable. From Freemasonry and Co-Masonry, in which Gardner moved, came the degree structure, the oath-bound initiation, and the secrecy. From the ceremonial magic of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn — the late-Victorian order that had gathered Kabbalah, tarot, and ritual into one graded system — came the cast circle, the elemental quarters, and the consecrated tools. From Aleister Crowley, whom Gardner met in 1947 and from whom he took an authorization, came liturgical phrasing that runs through the early ritual text. And from Charles Leland’s Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches (1899) came the figure of the witch as devotee of a goddess rather than the Devil’s servant of the trial records.

The historical frame came from Margaret Murray’s witch-cult theory. In The Witch-Cult in Western Europe (1921) and The God of the Witches (1931) she argued that the early-modern witch trials had documented a real, organized, pre-Christian fertility religion — a horned-god cult organized in covens of thirteen, mistaken by its persecutors for devil-worship. The theory gained durable authority when Murray was invited to write the “Witchcraft” entry for the fourteenth edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica (1929), which presented it as settled fact and remained in print into the 1960s. Specialist historians of the trials dismantled it: Elliot Rose (1962), Keith Thomas in Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971), and Norman Cohn in Europe’s Inner Demons (1975), who showed that the imagery of the witches’ sabbath was a fantasy assembled from slanders earlier directed at Jews, early Christians, and heretics, and that some of the sources earlier scholars had trusted were forgeries. The witch-cult hypothesis is now rejected by the field that produced it; no continuous pagan witch-religion survived the Reformation to be rediscovered.

That the synthesis was new has not lessened its reach. The liturgy that gave Wicca its devotional voice was largely the work of Doreen Valiente, initiated by Gardner in 1953, who reworked his composite ritual to soften its Crowleyan borrowings and produced the prose form of its central declaration of the goddess — texts that remain oath-bound and are not reproduced here. From Gardner’s initiatory line, and from the parallel Alexandrian tradition founded in the 1960s by Alex and Maxine Sanders, Wicca spread to the United States, Australia, and beyond, branching into Dianic and feminist forms and into the eclectic, solitary practice that decoupled the religion from coven lineage altogether. It remains the largest current within the movement.

Reconstructionism: rebuilding from the sources

Other strands work differently, and many of them define themselves against Wicca’s eclectic synthesis. The reconstructionist traditions aim not at invention but at scholarship: rebuilding the worship of a particular ancient people as closely as the evidence allows, from inscriptions, prayers, poems, and archaeology rather than from a modern liturgical inheritance. Hellenic reconstruction (Hellenismos) takes its bearings from Homer, Hesiod, and the study of ancient Greek cult; organized bodies such as the Supreme Council of Ethnikoi Hellenes formed in Greece in the 1990s. Baltic revivals — Lithuanian Romuva, Latvian Dievturība — draw on folk song and surviving rural custom in lands Christianized late. Kemetic reconstruction reaches for the gods of pharaonic Egypt.

The largest reconstructionist current is Heathenry, also called Ásatrú or the Northern Tradition, which rebuilds the religion of the pre-Christian Norse and Germanic peoples. Its difficulty is built into its sources: almost every coherent narrative survives only in Christian-era Icelandic manuscripts — the poems of the Edda and the handbook of Snorri Sturluson — written more than two centuries after the conversion. From these, and from skaldic verse, runic inscriptions, and the grave record, Heathens reconstruct the worship of Odin, Thor, and the other gods, and the seasonal observances of the old North. The movement is internally fractured: between universalist groups who hold the gods open to all and a folkish minority that ties them to ancestry, a fault line shadowed by the nineteenth- and twentieth-century völkisch appropriation of Germanic material that scholars such as Stefanie von Schnurbein have traced in detail. The reconstructionist temper — historical, source-anxious, wary of invented pedigree — is in part a deliberate correction of Wicca’s freer hand, though in practice the currents have borrowed from each other throughout.

Druidry: the older revival

Modern Druidry is older as a revival than either Wicca or reconstructionism, and it began as something other than a religion. Its first stratum is the antiquarian recovery of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when John Aubrey and then William Stukeley credited the great megaliths of Wessex to the ancient Druids — a guess, since Stonehenge predates any attested Druid by some two thousand years, but one that bound Druid and monument permanently together in the British imagination. On this followed the fraternal Druid orders, the first founded in London in 1781 on the Masonic model, sociable and benevolent rather than devotional. And on this, in turn, came the wholesale literary invention of Iolo Morganwg (Edward Williams, 1747–1826), the Welsh stonemason and forger of genius whose 1792 Gorsedd ceremony, fabricated bardic theology, and forged manuscripts seeded an entire “bardo-Druidic” cosmology into Welsh culture and into every Druid revival that followed. Only in the twentieth century — with orders such as the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids, founded in 1964 — did Druidry take on an explicitly religious and increasingly Pagan cast, drawing now on ecology and nature-mysticism as much as on the romantic antiquarian dream. Its thoughtful practitioners generally acknowledge that what they continue is an eighteenth- century creation, not a survival from the Iron Age.

The Goddess current

Across much of the field runs the Goddess. The divine feminine of modern Paganism draws partly from Robert Graves’s poetic study The White Goddess (1948), which gave the movement the Triple Goddess of Maiden, Mother, and Crone, the Oak King and Holly King of the turning year, and much of the imagery of the seasonal Wheel. It draws also from the conviction — widespread in the period, and now widely doubted by archaeologists — that prehistoric Europe had worshipped a single great mother before patriarchal invaders displaced her, a thesis carried into the later twentieth century by the archaeologist Marija Gimbutas and into feminist spirituality by writers who made the Goddess the center of a women’s religion. Whether read as the literal sovereign of the world, as the earth itself, or as an archetype of the psyche, she gives the movement a counterweight to the masculine monotheism it set itself against. The historical claim of a universal prehistoric matriarchy has not held up; the devotional power of the figure has been independent of it.

Belief, practice, and the question of what the gods are

Practitioners hold these things in markedly different ways, and the movement’s refusal to legislate belief is one of its defining features. Some are firm polytheists who address the gods as real and distinct persons, owed worship and capable of answering. Others read the deities as archetypes — faces of nature or of the psyche, drawing here on the analytical psychology that ran through much twentieth-century esotericism — and would claim no more than that. Between these stand pantheists and animists for whom the divine is the living cosmos itself, in the manner of pantheism, and “soft” polytheists who treat the many gods as aspects of one. The field has generally prized practice and direct experience over doctrine: the rite performed, the festival kept, the relationship tended, rather than the proposition affirmed. This is part of why it resists a single definition and tolerates so wide a range of belief under one name. The architecture is roughly shared even where the theology is not — a marked-out space, the calling of the quarters or the powers, the seasonal festival, the rite of passage — but the operative content of those rites, in the initiatory traditions, is held under oath and learned only within the circle.

Scholarship: the modern-response framing

The academic study of Modern Paganism — led for the English-speaking world by Ronald Hutton’s work and developed by sociologists and historians of religion — treats it less as a recovered antiquity than as a genuinely modern religious response: to industrial life, to the disenchantment of a world drained of the sacred, to the felt absence of nature from organized religion. On this reading the movement is assembled from older materials — Murray’s pseudo-history, the ceremonial magic of the Golden Dawn and Crowley, the literary Goddess of Graves, the fraternal and Masonic forms — but answering present concerns, and so most honestly understood as a creation of the very modernity it often defines itself against. That reading does not settle what the traditions are to those inside them, for whom the gods, the turning year, and the rites are not a reconstruction but a relationship. The histories are recent and largely documented; what the worship reaches toward is older than any of its founders could have made.

Texts, editions, and scholarship

The construction of Wicca and the broader field has been mapped in a literature that is itself part of the story, since several of the standard scholarly works were read, argued over, and partly absorbed by practitioners.

  • Ronald Hutton, The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft (Oxford University Press, 1999; rev. 2nd ed. 2019). The controlling history of Wicca’s emergence, tracing its sources to cunning-folk lore, Freemasonry, high magic, and the literary Goddess revival. Publisher page; the work calls Wicca the only religion England has ever given the world.
  • Ronald Hutton, Blood and Mistletoe: The History of the Druids in Britain (Yale University Press, 2009). The companion synthesis on the Druid revival, treating the modern Druids as a reception-history of an ancient priesthood about whom almost nothing certain is known.
  • Norman Cohn, Europe’s Inner Demons (1975); Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971); Elliot Rose, A Razor for a Goat (1962). The works that dismantled Murray’s witch-cult thesis; see the survey of the witch-cult hypothesis.
  • Stefanie von Schnurbein, Norse Revival: Transformations of Germanic Neopaganism (Brill, 2016), and her study Tales of Reconstruction: Intertwining Germanic Neo-Paganism and Old Norse Scholarship (Religion, 2015) — the standard critical account of Heathenry and its völkisch inheritance.
  • Charles Godfrey Leland, Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches (David Nutt, 1899). A key source for Wicca’s goddess-centered self-image, fully in the public domain; the text is hosted at the Internet Sacred Text Archive, with the standing caution that the authenticity of Leland’s reported manuscript is itself disputed.

The construction-history of these traditions and the lived experience of those who practice them sit side by side in this literature without resolving into each other: the documentary record shows when and from what the rites were built, and the practitioner’s testimony reports what is met in performing them. For those inside the circle and the grove the year still turns, the gods are still addressed, and the relationship — not the pedigree — is the thing held.

→ Related: Esotericism · Ritual · Theosophy · Naturalism · Witchcraft · Druidism · Freemasonry · Ceremonial Magic · Golden Dawn Lineage · Aleister Crowley · Pantheism · Occultism · Edda · Odin

Sources

  • Hutton 1999
  • Hutton 2009
  • Triumph of the Moon (OUP)
  • Witch-cult hypothesis
  • von Schnurbein, Norse Revival (Brill 2016)
  • Leland, Aradia (1899)