Milarepa

← Encyclopedia

Milarepa (c. 1052–1135) is the Tibetan yogi and poet held by tradition to have reached enlightenment in a single lifetime, after beginning it as a worker of black magic. He stands among the most beloved figures of Tibetan Buddhism, and his life-story has carried its central promise — that liberation is possible within a single lifetime, for someone who starts from very far down — for the better part of a millennium. Where many of the great adepts of the tradition are remembered as scholars or as the holders of an office, Milarepa is remembered as a man who had ruined his life and remade it on a mountainside, and the tradition has never let go of the contrast.

The shape of the source

What is known of him is not, in the strict sense, a record. The standard life comes from a biography compiled in the late fifteenth century by the wandering teacher Tsangnyön Heruka, the “Madman of Tsang” (gtsang smyon, 1452–1507) — some three centuries after Milarepa’s death. Tsangnyön belonged to a recognized type, the smyon pa or “holy madman,” a tantric adept whose deliberate breaking of monastic decorum was itself read as a sign of accomplishment; he was also, in plain documentary terms, a skilled editor and entrepreneur. He did not invent the story. He drew it together from a long sequence of earlier life-writings and song-collections that had been accumulating since the twelfth century, pruned and reshaped them, and in 1488 set the result into wood — preparing a xylographic, block-printed edition at a moment when printing was still a costly novelty in central Tibet. The undertaking demanded capital, carvers, paper, and ink on a scale that few could command, and the technology is part of why his version won: it could be reproduced and carried, and it crowded out its predecessors.

Tsangnyön cast the material in two parts meant to be read in sequence. The first is the narrative proper, the life of the Jetsün (“revered lord”) that traces the arc from crime to realization. The second, far longer, is the collection of teachings and songs — the work known as the Hundred Thousand Songs of Milarepa (Mila’i mgur ‘bum), among the most widely read religious poetry of Tibet. Read together they do something a chronicle cannot: they fix a model of what a liberated life looks like and make that model portable. The biography has been called the single greatest work of Tibetan literature, and it deserves the description less for documentary value than for the force with which it shaped how an entire culture imagined the path.

The crime

The narrative opens in hardship. Milarepa was born in the district of Gungthang in southwestern Tibet, into a prosperous family whose fortunes broke when his father died while he was a boy. By the terms of the story, a paternal aunt and uncle took over the estate that should have passed to the son, reduced the widow and her children to the status of servants on what had been their own land, and humiliated them through the years of Milarepa’s childhood. The wrong is concrete and domestic — not a cosmic injustice but a stolen inheritance — and the tradition is careful to let the reader feel its ordinariness before the machinery of revenge turns.

It was the mother who set that machinery in motion. Embittered past endurance, she sent her son away to learn sorcery, and charged him to bring it back against the kin who had despoiled them. He learned it. The account says he conjured a hailstorm to wreck their fields and, at a gathering in the usurpers’ house — a wedding feast, in the common telling — brought the roof down on the assembled guests, killing many of his own relatives. Whether the count is exact is beside the point the story is making: a young man, taught to wield the powers of magic for harm, used them, and the dead were his family. What follows from the act is the whole of the rest of the life. The crime is not a youthful error to be outgrown; it is the weight that everything afterward is measured against, and the reason the realization, when it comes, means what it means.

The penance under Marpa

Stricken with what he had done — and, the narrative adds, with the certainty of where such karma leads — Milarepa went looking for a teacher who could undo it. He came at last to Marpa the Translator (Marpa Chökyi Lodrö, c. 1012–1097), a layman and farmer of Lhodrak who had made the dangerous crossings into India and Nepal and carried tantric instruction home, translating the Sanskrit texts into Tibetan. Marpa was the holder of the practices Milarepa needed. He was also, in the story, a hard man, and he refused to teach.

Instead he set his new disciple to labor. He had Milarepa raise stone towers and then tear them down again and rebuild them, hauling the stones until his back was a mass of open sores, on the pretext of one architectural whim after another; a multi-storey tower at Lhodrak, the one the tradition counts as the last of these, is shown to this day. The cycle of building and demolition is the engine of this part of the life. In the tradition’s reading it is purification: the karmic debt of the killings could not simply be forgiven or waived but had to be spent, worked off through suffering proportioned to the harm, before the liberating instructions could safely be given. Marpa drove him to the edge of despair and beyond it — withholding, mocking, expelling him — and only when the debt was judged paid did he relent and transmit what he held: the teachings on mahāmudrā, the “great seal,” a contemplative approach centered on the direct recognition of the nature of mind, and the cycle of yogic methods known as the Six Yogas of Nāropa. The cruelty of the apprenticeship is not, in the story, cruelty; it is the exact measure of the disciple’s need.

The caves

Equipped at last, Milarepa withdrew to the high country to practice alone. He spent his decades in the caves and rock shelters of the southern ranges and the border country toward Nepal — the most famous of them remembered as Drakar Taso, “White Rock Horse Tooth” — in a regime of solitary asceticism so severe that it became the signature of the legend. He had no provisions and would take none; the account reports that he lived for years on the wild nettles that grew about his retreat, boiling them for soup until his body wasted to bone and his skin took on a greenish cast, the color in which the painters have shown him ever since. The privation is not presented as suffering for its own sake. It is the outward face of an inward labor — the stripping away of every comfort and distraction until nothing remained between the practitioner and the nature of his own mind — and at the end of it the tradition places his realization: the direct, unmediated knowing that the whole path had been aimed at, attained not in a monastery or a school but in a cave, by a man who had begun as a murderer.

The songs

What set him apart in memory was the manner of his teaching. He did not write treatises and held no scholastic office; he sang. In answer to a question, a doubt, a challenge from a skeptic, a demon, a hunter, a passing patron, or one of his own students, he would compose a song on the spot — plain in its imagery, drawn from the snow and the nettles and the caves around him, bound to no formal genre. These spontaneous verses, the mgur, were gathered into the Hundred Thousand Songs, and they are the reason his teaching traveled as widely as it did. Where doctrine asks to be studied, the songs ask only to be heard, and they have been heard, recited, and set to memory across the Tibetan world for five hundred years. They are woven through Tsangnyön’s narrative as the record of his most famous encounters — with his own disciples above all, and through them they pass the teaching forward.

The two who carry it furthest in the story are Rechungpa, the lay yogi-disciple who is Milarepa’s companion through much of the later life, and the physician-monk Gampopa, who came to him as an ordained scholar. It is Gampopa who matters most for what came after. He took the yogic, cave-dwelling lineage he received from his teacher and welded it to the monastic tradition in which he had been trained, giving the transmission an institutional body it had lacked. Through Gampopa the line that ran from a solitary hermit became one of the major monastic orders of Tibet.

The lineage

The path Milarepa transmitted did not originate with him. It had been carried to Marpa, in the tradition’s account, through the Indian masters Nāropa and Tilopa — the mahāsiddhas, the “great adepts” of late Indian tantric Buddhism — and behind them, in the lineage’s own reckoning, to the buddha Vajradhara, an unbroken descent that the Six Yogas and the mahāmudrā instructions are held to preserve. Tilopa to Nāropa to Marpa to Milarepa to Gampopa: this chain became the spine of the Kagyu school, one of the principal orders of Tibetan Buddhism and the keeper of the Vajrayāna techniques associated with these names. From Gampopa the Kagyu would branch widely — into the line of the Karmapas and a spread of sub-schools — but it returns, again and again, to the figure of the green-skinned singer in the cave, who is its proof that the teaching works. The Six Yogas themselves — inner heat, the illusory body, the dream state, the clear light, the transference of consciousness, and the practice keyed to the after-death interval — belong to the architecture of that transmission; the tradition guards them closely and confers them only within the bond of teacher and disciple, and the life is silent on their inner conduct even as it celebrates their fruit.

Reading the life

Historians treat the biography with care, and so does the tradition that reveres it. It is hagiography, written long after the events and shaped to instruct, and the marvels in it — the green skin, the flights through the air, the contests of power with rival yogis — belong to the conventions of the genre rather than to report; the dates themselves vary across the sources, with recensions giving brackets from the 1020s to the 1140s, and the figure is known through devotional life-writing rather than independent record. The most sustained modern study of how the legend was made is Andrew Quintman’s, which traces the biographical tradition across four centuries of accreting texts, from the earliest twelfth-century fragments to Tsangnyön’s canonizing print — showing the saint to be in a real sense the product of his tradition’s long labor of remembering, not a fixed figure recovered behind it. What can be said more firmly than any single episode is that a teacher of this name was honored as a founder of the Kagyu transmission, that a body of songs and a life attached to him, and that the two together became one of the durable instruments by which the tradition taught its own ideal: not the scholar and not the monk in his order, but the solitary practitioner who took the teaching into the mountains and was changed by it.

That the marvels read as genre does not empty the life of its claim. Within the frame the tradition holds, the point of Milarepa was never the hailstorm or the flight; it was the demonstration that the most extreme distance between a person and liberation can be crossed in one life by one person, if the labor is total. The asceticism, the nettles, the years alone are the argument, and the songs are its testimony.

Texts and scholarship

The version that fixed the legend is Tsangnyön Heruka’s 1488 compilation, the narrative life together with its companion collection of songs; the standard modern English rendering of the life is Lobsang P. Lhalungpa’s The Life of Milarepa: A New Translation from the Tibetan (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1977), long the most widely read version in the West. Andrew Quintman’s translation for Penguin Classics (2010), with an introduction by Donald S. Lopez Jr., is the current scholarly standard, and Christopher Stagg’s complete The Hundred Thousand Songs of Milarepa (Boston: Shambhala, 2017) gives the song-cycle in full. The critical literary history of the biographical tradition is Quintman’s The Yogin and the Madman: Reading the Biographical Corpus of Tibet’s Great Saint Milarepa (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014), which reconstructs how the life was assembled over four hundred years and how Tsangnyön’s print came to displace its rivals. A concise documentary biography, with the variant dates and lineage laid out, is Quintman’s article in the Treasury of Lives, the biographical encyclopedia of Tibet and the Himalaya. On the material history of the canonizing edition — the woodblock printing that carried the legend across the plateau — the Rubin Museum’s Project Himalayan Art documents the earliest surviving printed copies. The oldest English-language version, made from Tsangnyön’s rNam thar, is the 1928 Tibet’s Great Yogī Milarepa, translated by the Sikkimese scholar Lama Kazi Dawa-Samdup and edited by W. Y. Evans-Wentz — a text whose Theosophically inflected framing later scholarship reads with caution, but which is itself a primary document of how Milarepa first reached the West.

A man who had killed turned into a saint, and the turn is the whole of it.

→ Related: Buddhist Madhyamaka · Buddhism Theravada · Gnosis · Marpa · Tilopa · Naropa · Tibetan Buddhism · Tibetan Vajrayana · Asceticism · Karma Lingpa · Buddha · Mahayana · Reincarnation · Karma · Mysticism