Michael Scot

← Encyclopedia

Michael Scot was a Scottish-born scholar of the early thirteenth century — a translator, physician, and astrologer — who carried Arabic learning into Latin Europe and was remembered, within a generation of his death, as a magician. The two reputations are not separate — the wizard, on inspection, is what the strangeness of his learning looked like from the outside.

Almost nothing of his early life is documented; the dates of about 1175 to 1232 are reconstructions. He surfaces in Toledo around 1217, in the workshop of translation that was then turning the philosophical and scientific corpus of the Arab world into Latin. There he rendered Aristotle’s books on animals from Arabic, and — more consequentially — the commentaries of Averroes, whose reading of Aristotle would unsettle Christian theology for the rest of the century. By the 1220s he had entered the service of the Emperor Frederick II in Sicily, a court famous for its appetite for Arabic and Greek knowledge, and there he acted as the emperor’s astrologer. Under his own name circulated works on astrology, on physiognomy, and on the occult sciences — among them the Liber introductorius, a sprawling introduction to the reading of the stars.

The line between his science and his magic was one his own age drew differently than a later one would. Astrology was, for him and his patrons, a learned discipline: the heavens governed the lower world, and a trained reader could follow that governance and counsel a king by it. Physiognomy and the casting of nativities belonged to the same body of natural knowledge. But knowledge of that order, in a culture wary of it, slid easily into the suspicion of commerce with spirits, and Scot’s name attracted that suspicion fast.

The afterlife is the larger fact. Dante, writing within a century, set Michael Scot in the eighth circle of Hell among the diviners and sorcerers, his head twisted backward — a man who had presumed to see ahead, condemned to look only behind (Inferno XX). Scottish and Border folklore made him a wizard outright, crediting him with cleaving the Eildon Hills and binding demons to impossible tasks; Walter Scott gathered some of these tales centuries later. The historical translator and the legendary magus are not the same figure, and the records that would let the one be cleanly separated from the other are thin.

What scholarship can establish is the smaller, firmer claim: that a real man moved learning across a language barrier at a decisive moment, and that the content of that learning — the stars, the body, the hidden correspondences of things — was strange enough that the age remade him into a sorcerer. The wizard of the legends is a portrait of how his contemporaries felt about what he actually did.

→ Related: Pietro D Abano · Apollonius Of Tyana · Ptolemy · Middle Ages