Maruts

← Encyclopedia

A storm comes over the Vedic world not as a single force but as a crowd. The Maruts arrive in numbers — never one, never named one by one, but reckoned by the handful and the score: seven, or three times seven, or sixty-three, the tallies shifting hymn to hymn as if no poet could quite hold the host still long enough to count it. They are the storm-gods of the Rigveda, a troop of youthful deities of wind, rain, and thunder, and the oldest layer of Vedic poetry addresses them almost always as a single named band, a brotherhood that rides together and acts as one. Where other gods are approached as persons — Indra the king, Agni the fire, Varuṇa the keeper of order — the Maruts are approached as a company, a war-host on the move, brilliant and loud, shaking the mountains and bursting the rain-clouds as they pass.

The plurality is the point. The poets return again and again to the difficulty of numbering them, and the difficulty is itself a kind of praise: a force that cannot be counted is a force that fills the sky. The thrice-seven of the hymns becomes, in the later reckoning of the Brāhmaṇas and the epics, a fixed sixty-three, divided into troops or gaṇas of seven, each troop a unit of the larger host. They are brothers of equal age, equally adorned, born together and indistinguishable — and this evenness, this refusal of the individual face, is unusual among the Vedic gods, most of whom are sharply singular. The Maruts are the great Vedic image of the collective: a divinity whose nature is to be many.

Sons of Rudra, born of the dappled cloud

In the hymns the Maruts are the sons of Rudra, the fierce archer-god of the storm and the wilderness, and they take from him both their violence and their ambiguity — the same god who scatters disease with his arrows and withdraws it with his remedies. After their father they are sometimes called the Rudras, a name that later hardens into a separate enumerated class of gods, the eleven Rudras of the standard lists; the slippage between “the Maruts” and “the Rudras” runs all through the tradition and is never fully resolved. Their mother is Pṛśni, the dappled one — a word that means speckled, many-colored, mottled. The dapple is read as the storm-cloud, grey and streaked and shot with light, or as the speckled sky of scattered cloud; Pṛśni is the cloud-cow whose milk is the rain, and the Maruts are the milk made into riders. One striking hymn gives them a stranger origin still, born from the laughter or the breath of Rudra, or from a drop spilled across the heavens — the poets reach for the moment a storm condenses out of nothing and find no single image equal to it.

They are also, in a few passages, called the sons of heaven, and linked to other powers of the air without surrendering their distinctness: kin to the wind in its restless motion, allied to the twin horsemen of dawn, brothers in the weather to the rain that falls when they pass. But the parentage that the hymns insist on is Rudra and Pṛśni — the fierce god and the dappled cloud, violence and the rain it carries.

The fixed iconography of a riding host

The Maruts are described with a consistency rare among Vedic gods, who are otherwise praised in floating, interchangeable epithets. The Maruts have a costume, and the poets keep it. They are golden — golden-breasted, wearing ornaments and anklets of gold that ring as they move. They are self-yoked: they harness themselves to their own chariots, needing no charioteer, an image of pure self-moving energy. Their cars are drawn by spotted deer, the dappled mounts that echo their dappled mother, and they ride armed — spears on their shoulders, axes in their hands, lightning held like a weapon, and on their heads or in their wake the flash of the bolt. They sing as they ride. The hymns make their song the engine of the storm: the Maruts are poets and singers themselves, and their riding-song is the thunder, the roar that the texts dwell on more than any deed.

This is the most distinctive feature of the Marut poetry. More than thirty hymns of the Rigveda are addressed to them, and across these the emphasis falls not on petition — not on “give us this, do that for us” — but on the sheer spectacle of the storm. The poets describe the noise, the violence, the trembling of the mountains and the rivers driven backward, the trees torn and the earth shaking, the dust raised in a wall. The Maruts are sung as a phenomenon witnessed, not a power bargained with. A scholar reading the corpus notices that these are among the most purely descriptive hymns in the Veda, closer to weather-painting than to prayer — the storm rendered as a procession of bright armed youths who have come from somewhere and are going somewhere, and who will not be stopped.

Indra’s companions against Vṛtra

The standing role of the Maruts is as the companions and war-host of Indra, the warrior-king of the gods. When Indra goes out to his central deed — the slaying of Vṛtra, the serpent who lies coiled around the mountain and withholds the waters, so that the rivers cannot run and the world is parched — the Maruts ride at his side. They are his gaṇa, his troop, the host that a war-leader brings to battle. They strengthen him with their song and their shouting; some hymns say it is the Maruts’ praise that swells Indra to the size of his task. When the serpent is split and the waters break free and run down to the sea, the storm that follows — the rain that the released waters become — is the Maruts arriving in the victory’s wake. The myth is, at bottom, a meteorological drama read as a war: the drought broken, the monsoon loosed, the rivers refilled, told as a king and his riders breaking a siege.

The alliance is not always easy, and the Vedic poets, unusually, preserve the strain. One celebrated sequence of hymns stages a quarrel between Indra and the Maruts over honor and the share of the offering. In the dispute Indra, flush with his own glory, claims the deed of Vṛtra-slaying as his alone and slights the Maruts’ part; the Maruts, affronted, withdraw their support or demand their due; and the poet must work to reconcile them, to remind Indra that he did not fight unaided and to restore the Maruts to their portion of the sacrifice. The quarrel is theology in miniature — the question of who is owed worship, and how a great god and the host that serves him divide the credit. That the tradition kept the friction rather than smoothing it over is itself revealing: the Maruts were strong enough, in the older religion, to be worth quarrelling with.

Rain-bringers and physicians

Beyond the war-host, the Maruts have a quieter standing as powers of fertility and healing, and here the hymns do turn to petition. As the bringers of rain they are the gods who fatten the fields, and they are invoked for the prosperity of crops and cattle and for the wealth that follows a good season. The storm they are is the storm that ends a drought, and a people whose life turned on the monsoon had every reason to court the riders who brought it. They are asked for rain, for abundance, for offspring, for the increase of the herds.

They are also healers. A few hymns address the Maruts as physicians who hold pure remedies — the same double aspect that marks their father, the god whose arrows bring sickness and whose hand withdraws it. The medicines of the Maruts are imagined as the cleansing power of the storm itself: the rain that washes, the wind that clears the air, the lightning that purifies. To call on the Maruts for healing is to ask the storm to scour as well as to drench. This medical aspect ties them to the older Vedic sense of the storm as a force that sweeps the world clean and renews it, violence in the service of fertility.

The young war-band: the Indo-European pattern

The Maruts answer to a type that scholars of comparative Indo-European mythology recognize across the early daughter-cultures: the band of young warriors, the divine counterpart of a human institution. In the reconstructed social world of the early Indo-European peoples, the unmarried young men of a community formed a war-troop — a fellowship of equals who hunted and raided and ranged together, set apart from settled adult society, bound by oath and song, before they married and took their place among the householders. This Männerbund, this band of armed youths, has its mythic mirror in a troop of divine warriors who are forever young, forever unmarried, forever in motion as a brotherhood. The Maruts are the Vedic form of that mirror: a host of youths, all of an age, equally armed and equally adorned, who act only together and never settle. Their evenness, their plurality, their refusal of the individual name — the very features that make them strange among the personal gods of the Veda — are exactly what the war-band type predicts.

The etymology of their name has been argued over for a century and a half. The proposal that Marut is cognate with the Latin name of the war-god — a tempting parallel, war-host beside war-god — has been advanced and as often disputed; the sound-correspondences do not sit easily, and the connection is not now generally accepted. Most readings tie the word instead to a root meaning to shine or to gleam (the Maruts as the flashing ones) or to a root meaning to crush or to grind (the Maruts as the crushers, the grinders of mountains). The matter is unsettled, and the careful philologist leaves it so rather than forcing a genealogy the phonology will not bear.

From storm-host to a name in the lists

In the later development of Hinduism the Maruts faded from independent worship, and they faded for a structural reason: they were Indra’s host, and as Indra declined, the host declined with him. The warrior-king of the Veda, supreme in the hymns, was steadily displaced in the classical period by the great gods of devotion — the rising Śiva, who absorbed their father Rudra, and the rising Viṣṇu — and the storm-myth of Vṛtra-slaying became one tale among many rather than the central drama of the cosmos. The Maruts, having no cult of their own that did not run through Indra, lost their hymns and kept only their list. They survive in the classical material as a fixed enumerated group — the sixty-three or the troops of seven — recalled in catalogs of the gods, invoked beside the other troops of celestial beings, given a genealogy in the epics and Purāṇas (where a story is told of their birth from a single embryo cut into many pieces, each piece become a Marut, a late narrative built to explain the old plurality). They remain in the standing roll of the heavens, a class of beings still named, but no longer the bright armed crowd that filled the sky of the older poetry.

The texts and the scholarship

The Maruts are known almost entirely from the Rigveda, where their more than thirty hymns are concentrated in the first, fifth, and eighth books, with the dialogue-hymn of their quarrel with Indra (Rigveda 1.165 and the hymns around it) among the most studied passages in the whole collection. The complete verse rendering long standard for English readers is Ralph T. H. Griffith’s The Hymns of the Rigveda (1889–1892), hosted in full and freely readable here. The most heavily annotated scholarly treatment of the Marut and Rudra hymns in the public domain is the selection in Vedic Hymns, translated by Hermann Oldenberg and F. Max Müller as volumes 32 and 46 of the Sacred Books of the East (1891 and 1897); the Müller-Oldenberg Rigveda volume is available online and gives the Marut hymns with the fullest pre-modern apparatus. H. H. Wilson’s older prose translation, following the indigenous commentator Sāyaṇa, preserves the traditional Indian exegetical reading of the same hymns against Griffith’s verse.

The synthetic account that fixed the modern scholarly picture of the Maruts is A. A. Macdonell’s Vedic Mythology (1897), which assembled the scattered hymn-data into the coherent profile — the parentage from Rudra and Pṛśni, the fixed iconography, the war-band role, the Indra alliance, the rain and healing functions — that later handbooks repeat. The much-discussed quarrel-dialogue itself, Rigveda 1.165, can be read in Griffith’s English in the first book of the collection. A. B. Keith’s later Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads (1925) revisited the same material with a more cautious eye toward the nature-myth readings, and the comparative case for the Maruts as the divine war-band has been developed by successive students of Indo-European poetics and the youthful warrior fellowship.

What the early hymns preserve is less a set of myths than a way of seeing weather as agency — the storm not as event but as a company of riders, named, adorned, and on their way somewhere. The poets who sang to them were addressing the sky in motion, and asking it to pass over kindly.

→ Related: Rigveda · Rudra · Indra · Hinduism · Historical Vedic Religion · Soma · Agni