Manu

← Encyclopedia

Manu is, in Hindu tradition, the first man: the ancestor of the whole human race, the survivor of a world-ending flood, and the figure to whom the most influential of the Sanskrit law-books is ascribed. The name carries the claim before any story is told. It stands beside the Sanskrit verbal root man-, “to think,” and beside the ordinary words for a human being — manuṣya and mānava, each of which parses as “belonging to Manu” or “descended from Manu.” To be human, in this vocabulary, is to be one of Manu’s people; mānava, the descendant of Manu, is simply the word for mankind. The thinker, the man, and the ancestor of all men are folded into a single syllable, so that the figure is inscribed in the language his children speak. The same root surfaces far beyond Sanskrit — in the Germanic Mannus whom Tacitus, writing near the close of the first century, names as the forefather of the Germanic peoples, and in the reconstructed Indo-European pairing of a first man with his sacrificed twin. The figure of a single human source from whom all later people descend — the role that Adam fills in the Abrahamic account — is one of the recurring shapes by which traditions tell their own beginning; Manu is its Indian bearer, distinguished by the name that became the common word for man. Across that older Indo-European horizon the first human and the word for human keep arriving together, the name doing the work of a definition.

Manu belongs to the deep layers of Indian religion — the world of the Vedic sacrifice and the priestly cosmologies that grew from it, the formation that gathers under the names of Vedic religion and the broader tradition of Hinduism it became. The hymns of the Ṛgveda, the oldest stratum of the corpus, already know him: there he is the ancestral sacrificer, the first to kindle the fire and pour the offering, the forefather whose example the priests repeat. He is, from the start, less a character in a story than a precedent — the one who did the sacred things first, so that everything done after is done in his line.

The flood

The oldest surviving telling of the flood belongs to the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, a vast ritual treatise composed in the early first millennium BCE for the priests of the Vedic sacrifice. The episode is brief and strange. Water is brought to Manu in the morning for washing his hands, and a small fish comes into his palms. The fish speaks: rear me, and I will save you. Manu asks from what, and the fish answers that a flood will sweep away all creatures, and that it will carry him through. He keeps the fish, moving it as it outgrows each vessel — from a jar to a pit to the sea — until it is the largest of fishes and needs no keeping. Then it tells him the year of the coming deluge and instructs him to build a ship and to enter it when the waters rise. The flood comes; Manu binds the ship’s rope to the fish’s horn, and the fish tows him through the rising ocean to a mountain in the north. As the waters subside he descends along the slope — the place is remembered as the spot where the ship was bound — and finds himself the only man left alive. Through sacrifice and austerity, pouring an oblation into the waters, he generates a woman, and from the two of them the human race is begun again. Manu is at once the last of the drowned world and the first of the world that follows.

Later tradition expanded the episode and gave the fish a name. In the Mahābhārata and in the Matsya Purāṇa the rescuing fish is disclosed as Viṣṇu, descending in the form of Matsya, the fish — the first of his great descents into the world to preserve it at moments of dissolution. The Purāṇic Manu gathers the seeds of all living things and the seven sages aboard the ship before the waters take the earth, so that the vessel carries not one survivor but the whole inventory of creation in miniature, waiting to be sown again. What was a terse Brāhmaṇa parable of a sacrificer saved by his own piety becomes, in the epic and Purāṇic retellings, a cosmic rescue: the god enters the failing world as an animal, and a single righteous man is appointed to ferry life across the gap between one creation and the next.

The shape is ancient and widely shared — a warned survivor, a vessel, a mountain landing, a repopulated earth — and the kinship between Manu’s deluge and the flood narratives of Mesopotamia, where the hero of Gilgamesh hears the same warning and builds the same ark, was among the first observations of comparative mythology. Manu takes his place among the warned survivors of the flood traditions of the world, the genre’s eastern witness, with the distinctive feature that his rescuer is a divine animal and his ark a seed-store of all life. The genre and its lines of transmission belong to their own inquiry; what is proper to Manu is the use the tradition makes of him. His flood is not principally a record of catastrophe but an account of continuity — of how the human line, and indeed all life, is threaded unbroken through the destruction of a world. The fish that saves him is the same power that orders the cosmos, and the man it saves is the one whose descendants will be named for him.

The lawgiver

A second strand of tradition makes Manu the first lawgiver, and it is this that gave his name its widest currency. The genre to which the law-book belongs, the dharmaśāstra, is the body of Sanskrit literature concerned with dharma — the encompassing concept of right order that runs from cosmic regularity through social duty to personal righteousness, a single word for the way things ought to hold together. Within that literature the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra became the preeminent authority, the text against which later jurists wrote their commentaries and from which they drew their citations. The Mānava-Dharmaśāstra — the “treatise on dharma belonging to Manu,” long known in English as the Laws of Manu — presents itself as his pronouncement on the whole order of human life. It opens with the great sages approaching Manu and asking him to declare the duties of the social classes; he relates a cosmogony, the unfolding of the world from the self-existent, and then proceeds through the body of the law. Its subjects are the architecture of an entire society: the four varṇas and the duties proper to each; the conduct of the king and the administration of justice, punishment, and taxation; marriage and its forms; inheritance; purification and diet; the duties of women; expiation for wrongdoing; and the four āśramas, the stages through which a life is meant to pass — the student, the householder, the forest-dweller, and the renouncer. The work is composed in polished verse and reads as a comprehensive statement of how the world, and the people in it, ought to be arranged. Its treatment of caste and of women is the prescriptive ordering of a hierarchical society of its time, and it stands as the most-cited and most-studied document of classical Indian social and legal thought.

The text’s relation to the figure whose name it bears is not what the ascription suggests. Modern scholarship places the composition of the surviving Mānava-Dharmaśāstra in roughly the second century of the Common Era — a single work of remarkable internal coherence, very likely shaped by one organizing hand working over older legal and aphoristic material, rather than the dictation of the primal ancestor at the dawn of the present age. “Manu,” in the title and the frame, is an authorial persona: the prestige of the first man, the flood-survivor and progenitor, is lent to a treatise so that its law might carry the authority of origin itself. The frame is deliberate. By placing its pronouncements in the mouth of the being from whom all humanity descends, the text claims that its order is not the contrivance of an age but the constitution given to mankind at its source. Within the tradition the ascription is taken at its word, and the law is held to descend from the first man and, through him, from the divine ordering of the world. The gap between that traditional ascription and the historical dating of the text is large; it is not a gap the tradition ever needed to close, because the persona was always doing the work of an origin rather than the work of a date.

The fourteen Manus

Hindu cosmology does not leave Manu as a single ancestor at a single beginning. It multiplies him across the immense architecture of cyclic time. The vast ages through which the world passes are grouped into manvantaras — “Manu-intervals” — and each is presided over by its own Manu, a sovereign of his epoch under whom a generation of gods, sages, and a ruling line hold their offices. Fourteen Manus reign in succession across a single day of the creator Brahmā, that day itself being a span of staggering length composed of seventy-one great ages under each Manu. The full machinery of those nested cycles — the four yugas, the great age, the day and night of the creator — belongs to the reckoning of the world-ages; what matters for Manu is that the first man is not unique but recurrent. He is an office as much as a person, refilled at each turn of the cosmic day.

The Manu of the present interval is the seventh, Vaivasvata — “son of the Sun,” born of the solar deity — and it is he who is identified with the survivor of the flood. Six Manus precede him in the present day of the creator, each named and each the sovereign of his own interval: the self-born first, and after him five more, down to the sixth, before Vaivasvata takes up the office of the current age. The same figure who threaded the human line through the deluge is the one who governs the current age of the world; the story of catastrophe and renewal and the cosmology of recurring sovereigns meet in him. The flood, read through this cosmology, is the boundary between intervals — the dissolution that closes one Manu’s reign and clears the ground for the next, with the rescued seeds of life carried across to be sown again under the new sovereign. Seven more Manus will follow Vaivasvata before the day of the creator ends and the world is withdrawn for a night. So the first man stands twice over: at the head of the human race in historical depth, and at the head of one interval among many in the turning of cosmic time. He is the beginning that keeps beginning.

Texts and scholarship

The Vedic flood belongs to the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, whose only complete English rendering remains Julius Eggeling’s, issued across five volumes of the Sacred Books of the East between 1882 and 1900; the flood episode stands at the close of its first book, and is available in the wisdomlib edition of Eggeling’s translation. For the law-book, the durable public-domain translation is Georg Bühler’s The Laws of Manu (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 25, Oxford, 1886), which carries extracts from the principal Sanskrit commentaries and is hosted in full at Wikisource. The standard modern critical edition is Patrick Olivelle’s Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra (Oxford University Press, 2005), which reconstructs the text from the collation of more than fifty manuscripts and supplies the dating and the account of the work’s composite authorship that current scholarship rests on. The widely read Penguin Classics translation by Wendy Doniger and Brian K. Smith (1991) presents the same text with a critical introduction. Olivelle’s earlier study of the renouncer’s path, The Āśrama System (1993), traces the history of the four stages of life that the law-book codifies. Across these editions the figure that emerges is the one the language already named: the first man, in whom the order of the world is grounded.

What holds the registers together is the logic of the name. Origin, survival, and law are not three Manus loosely sharing a syllable; they are one claim turned three ways. The first man is the one fit to carry life across the flood because he is the source of the line that the flood threatens; the law bears his name because law, to be more than the rule of an age, must descend from the source of mankind itself; and the cosmic office recurs under his name because every turning of the world needs a first man to begin it again. The thinker who gives humanity its word for itself, the sacrificer towed to the northern mountain, the voice of the great law-book, and the seventh sovereign of the present day of the creator are held in one figure because the tradition asks one thing of him at every level — to be the point at which the human world starts.

→ Related: Rhadamanthus · Lycurgus Of Sparta · Servius Tullius · Mesopotamia · Hinduism · Brahmanism · Rigveda · Vishnu · Comparative Flood Myth · Hinduism Yugas · Gilgamesh · Adam