Lollards

← Encyclopedia

The Lollards were a dissenting religious movement in late-medieval England, the followers and intellectual heirs of the Oxford theologian John Wycliffe, active from the 1380s into the sixteenth century. The name was an insult before it was a label — derived, most likely, from a Middle Dutch word for one who mutters or mumbles, applied to people thought to murmur their prayers and their criticisms alike. Those it described rarely used it of themselves; they spoke of “true men” and “known men,” people who knew.

What they were against is clearer than what they were for, because most of what survives was written by the church courts that prosecuted them. Wycliffe had argued that authority in religion rested on Scripture rather than on the institution that claimed to interpret it, and that a church grown rich and worldly had forfeited the right to its wealth. From that root the movement drew a recognizable cluster of positions: that the Bible should be available in English, that the clergy held no special power the laity lacked, that pilgrimages and the veneration of images were waste or idolatry, and — most dangerous of all — that the bread of the Mass did not literally become the body of Christ. The great Wycliffite achievement was the first complete English Bible, translated in the 1380s and 90s and copied in secret long after it was banned.

Scholarship has worked hard to separate the movement from the caricature. The early Lollards included Oxford scholars and a circle of knights at the court of Richard II; after the failed rising led by Sir John Oldcastle in 1414, the cause lost its protectors and went underground, surviving as a quiet network of artisans and tradespeople reading forbidden books to one another. How organized these later groups were, and how much continuity ran between Wycliffe’s Oxford and the cobblers hauled before bishops a century on, remains genuinely contested. England met them with fire: the statute De heretico comburendo of 1401 made burning the penalty for relapse, and a number of Lollards died by it.

They are often called proto-Protestants, and the resemblance is real — the appeal to Scripture, the suspicion of priesthood, the hunger for a vernacular Bible all return in the Reformation a century and a half later. The connection is harder to prove than to feel: when English reform did arrive, its leaders found a residue of Lollard reading already in the ground, though how much they drew on it rather than simply meeting it is debated. What is not in doubt is that here, well before Luther, a body of ordinary English people held that a person might read the word of God for themselves and answer to it directly — and were willing to be killed for thinking so.

→ Related: John Knox · Michael Servetus · Jovinianus · Middle Ages