Liturgy of the Hours

← Encyclopedia

The Liturgy of the Hours — also called the Divine Office, or after the book that held it, the Breviary — is the Christian practice of marking the day with prayer at appointed hours, built around the recitation and singing of the Psalms. Where the Mass is the church’s central act of worship, the Office is its clock: a return to prayer again and again as the daylight turns, so that the whole span of waking time is gathered into a single rhythm. It is a species of liturgy — fixed, corporate, handed on rather than improvised — but distinct from the Mass: not the sacrifice offered once at the altar, but the day itself broken into portions and each portion given back as praise.

The older habit

The practice grows from an older habit. Jewish prayer already had its set times — the hour of the morning and the hour of the evening sacrifice, and a third toward nightfall — and the Psalms themselves, the hundred and fifty poems of the Psalter ascribed to David, supply both the language and the timetable. One psalm declares that seven times a day its singer rises to praise; another that he wakes at midnight to give thanks; a third counts the watches of the night spent with God. Early Christians inherited the impulse and gave it shape. The earliest Christian sources already name the third, sixth, and ninth hours as times of prayer, and the rising before dawn, and the prayer at the lighting of the evening lamp — so that by the time communities of monks were keeping a daily round of services, they were not inventing the hours but ordering an instinct the church had carried from the beginning.

By late antiquity that ordering had hardened into two distinct shapes, and the distinction matters more than the surface continuity suggests. In the cities, the bishop’s church kept what scholarship calls the cathedral office: a public service, sung by the whole assembly morning and evening, built of a few fixed psalms chosen for the hour — praise at daybreak, thanksgiving over the kindled lamp at dusk — with light, incense, and song, meant to be attended by ordinary people who had work to return to. In the deserts and the early monasteries grew the monastic office: not a service for the people but a discipline for the monk, who aimed to pray without ceasing and so worked his way through the entire Psalter, psalm after psalm in order, with little ornament, as many hours as the day and night could be made to hold. Robert Taft’s history of the hours fixed this contrast as the master key to the whole subject: nearly every later form is some settlement between the cathedral’s selective praise and the monastery’s continuous recitation, and the Western Office that came down through the Middle Ages is largely the monastic pattern with cathedral elements folded in.

The Rule and the eight hours

It was in the monasteries that the system was fixed. The sixth-century Rule of Benedict of Nursia gave the Latin West its durable scheme, and the proportions of that scheme tell what the monasticism of the age valued. Benedict called the round the Opus Dei, the Work of God, and ruled that nothing was to be set before it — not labor, not study, not hospitality. He laid out a sequence of eight hours: the long night office, kept in the dark and later called Matins; Lauds at daybreak, the praise of the returning light; the short daytime hours of Prime, Terce, Sext, and None, brief pauses worked into the rhythm of manual labor at roughly the first, third, sixth, and ninth hours of daylight; Vespers in the evening as the lamps were lit; and Compline, the last office, said before sleep. Across the seven hours of the day and the one of the night Benedict distributed the whole Psalter, so that all hundred and fifty psalms were prayed through in the course of a single week and then begun again — and he added, with a note of mild reproach, that the ancient fathers had managed the same in a single day, and that monks who could not match the week were lukewarm.

Each hour took its own character from the place it held in the turning of the light. The night office and Lauds, the oldest and longest, carried the heaviest load of psalmody and the readings; their hinge from darkness to dawn made them the gravest of the day. The little hours were short by design — a hymn, a portion of a long psalm, a brief prayer — pauses rather than gatherings, calibrated so that the work of field and scriptorium was interrupted but not abandoned. Vespers, the evening office, became with Lauds one of the two great hinges around which the rest were arranged, and it gathered to itself the Magnificat, the song the Gospel of Luke gives to Mary at the Visitation. Compline closed the day with prayers for protection through the dark, the psalms of one who lies down and is not afraid; and in the medieval and later Western use it ended with a chant to the Virgin — most famously the Salve Regina, the antiphon that hails her as Queen and Mother of Mercy and asks her to turn her eyes toward the exiled children of Eve. That antiphon is one instance, the most beloved of several, of the way the Office closes its day: not with petition for the self but with a turn outward, the last words before sleep addressed to another.

This scheme, with local variations, became the backbone of monastic life across the Latin West. The cathedral and collegiate churches kept fuller, more elaborate forms; the orders that arose in the Middle Ages each shaped the round to their own end — the Cistercians under Bernard of Clairvaux pruning it toward austere simplicity, the friars carrying an abbreviated form on the road. But the spine held: the Psalter in course, the hours following the sun.

The Office as the church’s clock

For those who keep it, the Office is held to be more than private devotion. The tradition understands it as the prayer of the church as a body, offered on behalf of the world and joined to the unceasing praise the angels render before the throne; the one praying alone in a cell or a parlor is taken to be speaking not for himself but with the whole community, present and absent, living and dead, so that the words are never private even when said in solitude. This is the inner logic of the discipline: that the hours sanctify time itself, that the day does not merely pass but is offered, hour by hour, and that the praise rising somewhere on the earth at every moment of the turning globe never wholly stops. The Office is in this sense the church praying without ceasing — the literal attempt to obey the apostolic command, distributed across a community so that no single throat need bear it alone.

The Office also stands, in the church’s self-understanding, at the meeting of two older streams that the comparative study of prayer learned to distinguish. Friedrich Heiler, in Das Gebet — the most ambitious single comparison of prayer ever attempted — set ritual prayer, the fixed and inherited formula, over against prophetic prayer, the spontaneous cry of need; and he placed the Psalter at the seam between them, a body of fixed texts that nonetheless carries the full range of the unguarded heart — complaint, terror, exultation, the plea for vengeance, the surrender. The Office lives on exactly that seam. Its words are given in advance, said at fixed hours by obligation, in the manner Heiler called ritual; but the words themselves are the Psalms, the most prophetic prayer the ancient world produced, so that the one who keeps the hours is handed, day after day, language fierce enough to mean whatever the day demands. The form is fixed; what the form carries is not.

Asceticism supplies the discipline’s hardest edge. To rise in the dark for the night office, to break sleep and labor at the appointed hours whether the heart consents or not, is itself a mortification — the will bent to a rhythm not its own. The point, in the monastic understanding, is not feeling but fidelity: the Office is kept on the days it is dry as faithfully as on the days it burns, and the keeping is the prayer. From that discipline the Western contemplative tradition grew its Christian mysticism — the long immersion in the psalms, repeated until the words were no longer read but inhabited, was for centuries the ordinary soil in which contemplation took root. The mystics of the cloister did not set their experience against the Office; they found it there, in the thousandth singing of a psalm they had known since they were boys.

The Breviary

Clergy not living in monasteries were eventually bound to recite the whole Office as well — bishops, cathedral canons, and in time every priest and deacon in major orders, obliged to say the hours each day whether or not a choir gathered to sing them. This obligation reshaped the books. In the monastery the Office had required a small shelf: a psalter, an antiphonary, a hymnal, a lectionary with its readings, a collectar of prayers, a martyrology — several large volumes, each holding one strand of a service woven from many. A cleric traveling, or saying the hours alone, could carry no such library. So the strands were gathered and abridged into a single portable volume that held everything needed to say the Office through the year — the Breviary, from the Latin for an abridgment or compendium, a compression of what had once filled the choir books into one book a man could carry in a saddlebag. The friars, especially the Franciscans, drove the form: a mendicant on the road needed exactly such a book, and the Breviary of the papal court that the Franciscans adopted and spread became, by the late Middle Ages, the common Western form. The shift from sung choir to silent private recitation is the quiet hinge of the whole later history: the Office that had been a community singing in a stone church became also a man’s lips moving over a small book, alone, fitting the hours into the gaps of a working life.

The Eastern forms and the wider field

The Latin West is one settlement of the hours, not the only one. The Eastern churches developed their own and far more elaborate cycles — the Byzantine round built on the Horologion (the book of the hours), the Octoechos with its eight-week cycle of tones, the great Lenten and festal books — in which the same ancient hours appear under their Greek names and the Psalter is divided into twenty sections, the kathismata, read through across the week and twice over in Lent. The monastic communities of Mount Athos, where the Office can run through much of the night, preserve the longest and least abridged form of the discipline anywhere in Christendom; there the Hours frame and feed the inner prayer of the heart for which Eastern monasticism is known. The Oriental Orthodox churches — Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, Ethiopian — each carry their own ancient arrangements of the same impulse, the day cut into prayer at fixed points from before dawn to nightfall.

What scholarship can establish about all of this is narrower and firmer than what the tradition holds about angels and unceasing praise: that the hours took their classic Latin form in the monastic centuries; that the cathedral and monastic patterns are genuinely distinct in origin and only later fused; that the core has always been the Psalter; and that the round has been revised repeatedly, never fixed once for all. The two truths sit side by side without quarrel — the documentary history of books and councils and revisions, and the thing the discipline takes itself to be from the inside.

The texts and the scholarship

The primary documents of the Western Office are the choir books and the breviaries themselves, and behind them the patristic sources that first name the hours. The conciliar and patristic record sits in the great nineteenth-century collections: the Latin and Greek arrangements of the early church orders, the ascetic rules, and the hymnody are gathered in J.-P. Migne’s Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca, the standard reference editions long in the public domain and the bedrock of all later study. The long institutional history of the single-volume book that compressed those choir texts is set out in the older reference literature — among the fullest the Catholic Encyclopedia article on the Breviary, which traces its growth from the monastic choir books to the papal court’s portable volume. The modern critical recovery of the Office’s history belongs above all to Robert F. Taft, whose The Liturgy of the Hours in East and West (1986) is the indispensable single-volume account and the source of the cathedral-versus-monastic distinction in its now-standard form; Taft traced each hour back through the Egyptian, Cappadocian, Palestinian, and Constantinopolitan sources and showed how the two ancestral patterns combined. The comparative place of the Psalter and of fixed-formula prayer was charted earlier and on a far wider canvas by Friedrich Heiler in Das Gebet (Munich, 1918; abridged in English as Prayer, 1932), whose typology of ritual and prophetic prayer remains the frame within which the Office’s peculiar position — fixed words carrying unfixed need — is best understood, even as his Lutheran ranking of the types has been set aside. For the texts as the church now uses them, the General Instruction of the Liturgy of the Hours of 1971 sets out the rationale of the modern Roman arrangement in the church’s own voice.

The reform of the cycle

The Office that the monastic centuries built proved, in the end, too heavy for the lives most of its later keepers led. By the twentieth century the obligation of the full daily round pressed hardest on the secular clergy and the active religious orders — teachers, nurses, missionaries, parish priests — for whom the hundred and fifty psalms a week, said privately and at speed, had become a burden discharged rather than a prayer prayed. The Roman rite, in the liturgical reform that followed the Second Vatican Council, recast the whole. The revised Liturgy of the Hours, promulgated in 1971, reduced the hours of the day from eight to a smaller set — keeping an Office of Readings that may be said at any hour, Morning and Evening Prayer as the two hinges, a single midday hour, and Night Prayer — suppressed Prime outright, and spread the Psalter across four weeks rather than one, dropping a handful of the harshest imprecatory psalms from the public cycle. The aim was to return the hours to something a working Christian, lay or ordained, might actually keep: praise tied again to the true hours of morning and evening rather than recited in bulk to satisfy a rule.

The Anglican settlement had reached a parallel solution four centuries earlier. Thomas Cranmer, compiling the Book of Common Prayer in the sixteenth century, collapsed the eight monastic hours into two — Morning Prayer (Mattins) and Evening Prayer (Evensong) — and arranged the Psalter to be read straight through in a month rather than a week, in the vernacular, so that the hours could be kept by an ordinary congregation in an ordinary parish. Evensong, the direct heir of Vespers and Compline fused, carried the Magnificat and the Nunc dimittis into English and became one of the most durable forms of fixed-hour prayer in the language. The two reforms, Roman and Anglican, reached the same instinct by different roads: that the cathedral pattern of a few psalms at the true hours, open to the people, was the form most likely to survive.

The result of all of it is one of the longest-running continuous practices in Western religion: the same psalms, in much the same order, said at the same hours, by people who in most other respects would not recognize one another’s worlds. The day is still divided the way the monks divided it, and the prayer still follows the light.

→ Related: Salve Regina · Middle Ages · Vespers · Benedict Of Nursia · Monasticism · Psalms · Roman Rite · Liturgy · Book Of Common Prayer · Mary