Laomedon

← Encyclopedia

Laomedon is the legendary king of Troy in Greek myth, remembered chiefly for a single recurring fault: he made bargains he did not keep, and the breaking of them brought ruin on himself and his city. He was the father of Priam, under whose reign the Troy of the Iliad would later fall, and so he stands a generation before the famous war, in the city’s first destruction rather than its last. His name is invoked less as a man than as a measure — the standing case by which the Greeks reckoned what it costs to swear to a god and then withhold the wage.

Apollo and Neptune advising Laomedon on the building of Troy, fresco by Domenichino and assistants, c. 1605-06, National Gallery, London — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The figure sits high in the Trojan royal line. He was son of Ilus, the founder of Ilion, grandson of Tros who gave the people and the land their name, and so of the house descended from Dardanus. Through that same house ran the inheritance that would later trap him: Tros, his grandfather, had been recompensed by Zeus for the carrying-off of the boy Ganymede with a breed of immortal horses, the finest under the dawn and the sun. The horses were a god’s payment for a god’s taking — and Laomedon, two generations on, would promise them to a stranger and refuse to hand them over. The whole of his story is set within a family already entangled with the gods by gift and by debt.

The withheld wage

The defining story is one of withheld wages. Apollo and Poseidon, the tradition holds, were bound for a year to serve a mortal, and in that time built the great walls of Troy at Laomedon’s command. The Iliad gives the scene in Poseidon’s own mouth in its twenty-first book: the sea-god raised the city’s beautiful, unbreakable wall while Apollo herded the shambling cattle in the wooded glens of Ida; and when the agreed season closed and the wage fell due, Laomedon withheld it in full and drove them off with a threat — to bind them hand and foot, to sell them away to distant islands, and, worse, to crop the ears of immortals with bronze. The two went away angry over the promised reward unpaid. That the gods served at all is differently explained: in one strand they had revolted against Zeus and were sentenced to a year of mortal labor in expiation; in another, told by the mythographer Apollodorus, they came of their own accord in human likeness to put the king to the test. The variant matters less than the constant. Whatever brought the gods to his gate, Laomedon swore a wage and refused it.

Fortification walls at the archaeological site of Troy (Hisarlik), the city whose mythic walls the gods were said to have raised — photograph via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

The affront was not only personal but cultic: an oath sworn and broken touched the divine order itself. The retribution came in the gods’ own elements. Apollo sent a pestilence into the city — the bright god is also the plague-bringer — and Poseidon sent a sea-monster up out of his water against the coast. An oracle gave the only terms of relief: that Laomedon expose his daughter Hesione to the creature. He fastened her to the rocks by the sea and left her there. The king who had cheated two gods of their pay now paid with a child, and even that under compulsion.

Apollo and Poseidon Punishing Troy, painting by Paolo Fiammingo, c. 1590 — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The second perjury

Into this came Heracles, returning from another labor. Seeing the girl bound for the monster, he offered to kill it — for a price. The price was those same immortal horses: the mares Zeus had given the house of Troy in exchange for Ganymede, the matchless gift at the root of the line. Laomedon agreed. Heracles slew the sea-monster and freed Hesione, and the king, having got what he wanted, again broke faith and kept the horses. It is the same crime twice — a wage promised under oath, the service rendered, the wage withheld — but now the cheated party is a hero who can answer in kind. Heracles put to sea with a threat of war, and the threat was not idle. He returned with a fleet, took the city, and killed Laomedon and all his sons but one.

Hercules rescuing Hesione from the sea-monster, engraving by Bernard Picart after Charles Le Brun — Wellcome Collection, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

The survivor was the youngest, Podarces. Spared at his sister’s plea — Hesione, given as a prize to Heracles’ comrade Telamon, asked for her brother’s life and ransomed him with her veil — he was renamed Priam, a name the Greeks heard as the ransomed one, from the verb priamai, to buy back. The naming carries the whole moral in a syllable: the house that would not pay its debts survives only in the one son who had to be purchased out of slavery. (Scholars treat the ransom-etymology as a folk reading; the name itself is most likely Anatolian, a Luwian Pariya-muwa, something like foremost in might — so the Greek story has overwritten an older, foreign name with a meaning suited to the tale it tells.)

Other children of Laomedon scatter into other myths: Tithonus, carried off by the Dawn and granted deathlessness without the youth to bear it, a second cautionary tale of a divine gift ill-reckoned; and through Priam the long line of Trojan princes who fill the Iliad a generation later, among them the seer Helenus. The Ethiopian king Memnon, who would die at Achilles’ hands in the war Laomedon’s grandson did not live to see ended, belongs to that later cohort. They are the inheritors of a city twice marked — built by gods cheated of their wage, and standing on borrowed time from the first.

The shape of the tale

The figure is securely Homeric in outline — the Iliad names him and his cheated gods, and gives Poseidon’s reproach at length — and the fuller narrative is preserved by later mythographers and poets, who differ on details such as which gods served and why. Pindar, in his eighth Olympian, adds a stroke that binds Troy’s first ruin to its last: the gods summoned the mortal hero Aeacus to help raise the wall, and the section a man built was the section through which the city was fated to fall — twice, in two generations of Aeacus’s line, so that both the sack by Heracles and the war of the Iliad are written into the masonry. What scholarship treats as the stable core is the pattern itself: a doubled act of perjury against the sacred, answered by a doubled punishment. Laomedon is less a character than an exemplum, the standing case of the man who breaks an oath made to a god and learns that such oaths are not waivable.

The Romans took up the type and fixed its label. In the eleventh book of his Metamorphoses, Ovid stages the wall-building in three swift lines and names the king periurus, the perjurer; Troy becomes the city raised through broken faith, and Neptune’s flood the first installment of the reckoning. Valerius Flaccus, in his Argonautica, sets the rescue of Hesione on the route of the Argo and lets the treachery of the king cast its shadow forward to the vengeance still owed. The Latin tradition needed a word for the man who profits from a sworn bargain and denies the swearer his due, and it found one in the king of Troy.

The oath and its avenger

That moral weight is where his interest for the history of religious thought lies. Ancient cult held the sworn oath to be guaranteed by the gods, who were its witnesses and its avengers; perjury was not a private failing but a debt owed to the divine, and one collected in full. The oath itself was personified: Hesiod names Horkos, the Oath, as a child of Strife, born to harry those who swear falsely, and the curse a perjurer calls down on himself was understood to fall not only on the man but on his line. Zeus presided as Horkios, the overseer of oaths; at Olympia the athletes swore before his image, over the cut flesh of a boar, to contend without deceit. To break such a vow was to invite a pollution that worked itself out across generations — which is precisely what the Laomedon story narrates. The king cheats, and it is his city and his sons, not he alone, who answer. The tale dramatizes that conviction at the scale of a city: the broken oath is not forgiven and not forgotten; it is held against the whole house until it is paid.

The doubling is the point. One perjury might be read as a king’s hard bargain; two, identically structured — the wage sworn, the work done, the wage denied, first to gods and then to a hero — make of Laomedon a demonstration rather than an anecdote. The first cheat brings plague and monster, divine retribution from above; the second brings an army, human vengeance from outside; together they say that an oath is enforced from every quarter at once, and that there is no party too high or too low to leave the perjurer unanswered. He is the negative image of the lawful king, the man who treats a sworn word as a thing he owns rather than a thing he owes.

He is not a figure of esoteric doctrine, and the later mystical and Hermetic traditions made little of him; he carries no initiatory or theurgic teaching. His place is in the older and broader stratum where myth keeps a community’s law — here, the law that a vow given to a god is not a vow one may quietly drop. He survived instead as Troy’s first ruin, and as the name the myth attached to its own verdict: the oath broken with a god is collected in full.

Sources and scholarship

The primary record is compact and consistent in its skeleton. Homer’s Iliad supplies the load-bearing passages: Poseidon’s reproach to Apollo, with the year of service and the cheated wage, in Book 21; the genealogy of the divine horses given Tros for Ganymede in Books 5 and 20; and scattered references to the city twice taken. The fullest connected narrative is in the Library attributed to Apollodorus, which sets out the wall-building, the withheld pay, the plague and the sea-monster, the exposure of Hesione, Heracles’ bargain for the horses, the second cheat, and the sack with the ransoming of Podarces-Priam. The text is gathered with its variants at the Theoi Project’s compilation of the Trojan sea-monster sources, which assembles the Greek and Latin passages in translation. Pindar’s account of Aeacus and the fated wall is in Olympian 8; Ovid’s Latin retelling, with the king named the perjurer, sits at Metamorphoses 11.194ff.

The modern scholarship reads the story along two lines. The first treats Laomedon’s reign as Homer’s deliberate background-myth — the earlier Trojan war against which the Iliad measures its own — and asks how the cheated gods and the first sack shape the poem’s theology of divine resentment and the fragility of even god-built walls. The second is the study of the Greek oath as a religious institution: the standard collection, Horkos: The Oath in Greek Society, edited by Alan H. Sommerstein and Judith Fletcher, sets out the machinery of sworn obligation, the role of Zeus Horkios and the daimon Horkos, and the conviction that perjury draws an avenging pollution onto the swearer’s line — the very logic the Laomedon tale narrates. On the figure’s name and its layer, the priamai etymology for Priam is generally read as an aetiological folk derivation laid over an older Anatolian form, a reminder that the house of Troy carries names from a world the Greek poets inherited rather than invented.

→ Related: Helenus · Memnon · Apollo · Hercules · Zeus · Hera · Fate · Olympia · Prophecy · Divination