Karma Lingpa

← Encyclopedia

Karma Lingpa is a fixed point with almost nothing fixed around it. Tradition places him in the fourteenth century — the dates most often given are 1326 to 1386 — and there agreement begins to thin. His birthplace, the span of his life, the order of his teachers, the manner of his death: each comes down through sources written less to record a man than to authenticate a teaching, so that the biography and the credential are the same document. What the tradition does not leave in doubt is the function. He was a tertön, a treasure-revealer, and he is remembered for one act above all others — the drawing-forth of the cycle of teachings that holds the Bardo Thödol, the work the modern West renamed the Tibetan Book of the Dead. He belonged to the Nyingma, the oldest of the schools of Tibetan Buddhism, and to that school’s most distinctive way of receiving scripture: not by composing it and not by translating it from India, but by finding it where it had been left waiting.

The hundred peaceful and wrathful deities of the intermediate state, the assembly revealed in Karma Lingpa’s cycle — Tibetan thangka, 18th century, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The treasure and its logic

A terma is a treasure. The word names a teaching held to have been concealed — in rock and lake and statue and pillar, or deeper still, in the substrate of mind itself — by the eighth-century master Padmasambhava, Guru Rinpoche, and his inner circle, above all the adept Yeshe Tsogyal. The concealment was deliberate and timed. A teaching is sealed against a future age that the present one cannot yet use, entrusted to a particular person not yet born, and set to surface at the hour that person comes to it. The one who recovers it is the tertön, and the tradition holds him to be no stranger to the treasure but its appointed heir, often the rebirth of one of Padmasambhava’s own disciples, returning across centuries to collect what he himself helped to bury. Karma Lingpa is counted in this way as an emanation of Chokro Lui Gyaltsen, one of the original twenty-five.

Padmasambhava, Guru Rinpoche, held by tradition to have concealed the treasures recovered centuries later by tertöns — Tibetan thangka, 19th century, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The treasures sort into kinds. An earth-treasure (sa gter) is drawn from a physical place — a cliff face, a cave, the foundation of a temple, the hollow of an image. A mind-treasure (dgongs gter) surfaces not in the ground but in the depths of the revealer’s awareness, planted there in a prior life and ripening when finder and moment align. Either way the treasure is held to carry its own warrant: the foretold name of its discoverer, the certifying signs that accompany a true recovery, and the yellow scrolls (shog ser) inscribed in the cipher of the ḍākinīs, a script that does not so much inform the tertön as trigger in him the recollection of a teaching he already, at some buried level, holds. To find a treasure is, in this account, to remember one. The deeper logic of the system — that revelation did not close in a distant founding age but remains open, that the canon can take in a scripture in the fourteenth century that is nonetheless older than any text already in it, because its true date is the moment of concealment and not the moment of recovery — is the architecture within which Karma Lingpa’s whole significance sits, and it is set out at length under the Nyingma treasure tradition.

The mountain and the cycle

The account of the discovery is precise where the rest of the life is vague. Tradition holds that Karma Lingpa, around the age of fifteen, drew his treasure from a mountain called Gampodar, shaped — the sources like to say — like a dancing god. What he brought out was a cycle whose short Tibetan name is the Kar-gling Zhitro, the peaceful and wrathful deities of Karma Lingpa, and whose fuller title — Zab-chos zhi-khro dgongs-pa rang-grol, the profound teaching of the self-liberation of enlightened intention into the peaceful and wrathful — names its central vision. The cycle maps a single field of awareness as it appears under two aspects: a company of forty-two peaceful deities and fifty-eight wrathful ones, the hundred together, who are understood not as powers outside the mind that confronts them but as that mind’s own nature presenting itself, serene or terrible by turns, to a consciousness loosed from the body.

It is essential to what follows that the Bardo Thödol is not the cycle. It is a text within it — one ritual manual among a working set, drawn from a far larger body of liturgy, contemplative instruction, and tantric practice, much of which concerns the living and not the dead at all. The bardo the title names is the interval: the passage between one death and the next birth, charted by the cycle into stages. There is the clear light that dawns at the moment of dying; there is the unfolding, across days, of the peaceful and then the wrathful forms; there is the drift, karmically driven, toward a new womb. The function of the manual is to be read aloud at the side of the dying and the newly dead — thödol means liberation through hearing — so that the consciousness, meeting what rises before it, might recognize each appearance as the projection of its own awareness and, in that recognition, be freed. The architecture is one of recognition, not of conjuring: the deities are not summoned but identified, the way one might be told, in a dark room, the name of a shape one had taken for an intruder.

A teaching kept narrow

The cycle was not, at first, made public. Tradition holds that Padmasambhava had attached a condition to this particular treasure — that it pass, for a span of generations, through one person only, a single thread rather than a spreading fabric. Karma Lingpa accordingly transmitted the full cycle to his son, Nyinda Chöje, and the line ran narrowly for three generations before it was permitted to widen. This is not incidental to the cycle’s history; it shapes the textual record that survives. A teaching held by one heir at a time is a teaching held close to disappearance, dependent on a single life in each generation, and the later work of editing was in part the work of rescuing such a thread from its own fragility — gathering scattered transmissions, fixing an order, making reproducible what had been guarded.

That editorial labor is what carried the cycle from a private inheritance into a usable liturgy. In the late fifteenth century the master Gyarawa Namkha Chökyi Gyatso, abbot of Menmo in Kongpo, assembled the first readily reproducible arrangement of the Bardo Thödol material — a program a community could actually perform, rather than a sheaf of revealed fragments. Two centuries later the tertön Rikzin Nyima Drakpa produced the expanded recension, running to seventeen chapters, that would prove decisive for the text’s later fame: it was a portion of this redaction, in a bundle of Tibetan blockprints, that reached Western hands in the early twentieth century. The cycle that began as one man’s sealed inheritance had become, by then, a standing corpus with editors, arrangements, and a working life inside the monasteries.

The setting of the recitation

What makes the Bardo Thödol a manual rather than a meditation is its occasion. It is read where someone has died. Within the Tibetan handling of death — a tradition with a developed literature of dying, a calendar of rites across the conventional forty-nine days of the intermediate state, and a class of practitioners trained to attend the threshold — the cycle’s mortuary texts have a defined place: the words are addressed, by a lama or a trained reader, to a consciousness presumed still present and still able to hear, guiding it through the stages it is held to meet. The Bardo Thödol is therefore not the tradition’s single great book on death but one instrument in a working repertoire that includes the transference of consciousness, the long post-mortem observances, and the contemplative disciplines of the Great Perfection from which the cycle’s view of mind descends. To describe its purpose and its place is not to set down its performance: the architecture of the rite can be named without becoming an instruction in it.

Yama, Lord of Death, holding the Wheel of Life, an image of the death-and-rebirth cycle through which the cycle’s mortuary texts guide the consciousness — Tibetan gouache, Wellcome Collection, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

The wider world out of which this practice grew is the world of Tibetan Vajrayāna — the tantric Buddhism carried over the Himalaya from India by translators and yogis such as Marpa and Milarepa, and rooted further back in the Indian Mahāsiddhas, the “great accomplished ones” in whose songs of the innate and unconstructed mind much of the later vocabulary of awareness finds an ancestor. The treasure-system itself runs alongside a parallel revelation tradition in Bön, the indigenous Tibetan religion, whose practitioners hold their own treasure-lineages to antedate the Buddhist ones; the question of priority between them is old and unresolved, and the two developed in such close proximity that neither can be read in full isolation from the other. Within this field the doctrine of rebirth is not a backdrop but the load-bearing assumption: the passage from death to a new birth that the cycle charts is the very thing the cycle exists to act upon.

The blank and the book

Two silences attend Karma Lingpa, and they are not the same silence. The first is biographical. Almost nothing about the man can be fixed with the confidence a documentary historian would want; the dates, the lineage, the account of the discovery descend through hagiographical and lineage sources composed to certify the treasure, and modern Tibetology — Bryan Cuevas’s Hidden History of the Tibetan Book of the Dead (2003) is the first full historical study of the cycle — handles the life with caution while accepting that a tertön of this name stands at the cycle’s origin. This is a silence proper to the tradition’s own mode: a treasure-revealer is known by his treasure, and the warrant of the treasure is precisely a story of concealment and recovery that the canons of external evidence are not built to test. Janet Gyatso’s study of the treasure tradition’s logic of legitimation reads this not as a defect but as a working logic — a way a living tradition keeps producing authoritative scripture after its founding age is supposed to have closed, authoring forward while crediting backward.

The second silence is the one the modern West filled in with noise. The global fame of the Bardo Thödol is recent and, in an exact sense, imported. It is owed above all to the 1927 English edition assembled by Walter Evans-Wentz from Lama Kazi Dawa-Samdup’s rendering of three chapters of the Nyima Drakpa redaction — a volume whose very title, The Tibetan Book of the Dead, was a marketing coinage modeled on E. A. Wallis Budge’s Egyptian Book of the Dead and trading on the Egyptological excitement of the decade, and whose framing ran the Tibetan material through the categories of Theosophy and a perennialist comparativism foreign to it. The Tibetan title means liberation through hearing in the intermediate state; it names no book. As Cuevas argues, the famous “book” is a small selection from a large and many-handed funerary corpus, and the impression of a single celebrated scripture is an artifact of its Western reception rather than the tradition’s own valuation of it — a reception with a history of its own, distinct from the cycle and best followed apart from it.

The textual record and its study

The scholarly recovery of Karma Lingpa’s cycle has had, in effect, to peel two layers off the famous English volume to reach the Tibetan thing beneath it. The first layer is the editorial frame Walter Evans-Wentz laid over Lama Kazi Dawa-Samdup’s renderings; the second is the long-standing impression that The Tibetan Book of the Dead names a single canonical scripture. The decisive work here is Bryan J. Cuevas, The Hidden History of the Tibetan Book of the Dead (Oxford University Press, 2003), the first comprehensive Tibetological history of the Bar do thos grol, which reconstructs the cycle’s growth from a fourteenth-century revelation through its successive redactions and argues that the celebrated “book” is a small extract from a much larger, many-handed funerary complex (publisher record). Donald S. Lopez Jr.’s Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West (University of Chicago Press, 1998) traces the chain of Western reframings — Theosophical, Jungian, psychedelic, humanistic — through which the text passed, and his later The Tibetan Book of the Dead: A Biography (Princeton University Press, 2011) follows the volume itself as a cultural object. For the terma mechanism that makes Karma Lingpa intelligible at all, the foundational study is Janet Gyatso, “The Logic of Legitimation in the Tibetan Treasure Tradition,” History of Religions 33, no. 1 (1993), 97–134 (DOI), supplemented by her Apparitions of the Self (Princeton University Press, 1998) on the autobiographical writings of a later tertön.

The primary text most readers will meet remains the public-domain 1927 edition, Lama Kazi Dawa-Samdup’s English rendering compiled and edited by Evans-Wentz, which survives in clean transcriptions — a proofread Wikisource text of the first edition is freely available — but which is best read, as current scholarship insists, as a primary source for the Western reception of Tibet rather than a transparent window onto the cycle. The fuller and more accurate translations of the cycle itself, including Gyurme Dorje’s complete rendering of the Rikzin Nyima Drakpa recension (Penguin, 2005) and the version of Francesca Fremantle and Chögyam Trungpa (Shambhala, 1975), belong to the modern critical literature and sit outside the public domain. Read together, the scholarship makes a single point against the inherited picture: the object of study is not a book but a revelation with a textual afterlife, and the man at its head is legible only through that afterlife.

What the terma system claims, against both silences, is that revelation did not end in the distant past but continues — that a teaching can wait, sealed, for the moment and the person able to receive it, and that the moment is never the last one. Karma Lingpa is held to be one such person, the appointed finder of a treasure left for him before he was born; and the instructions drawn from his cycle are not a closed relic but a living office, taken up still in Tibetan Buddhist communities and read aloud where someone has died.

→ Related: Marpa · Padmasambhava · Nyingma Terma Dzogchen · Tibetan Buddhism · Reincarnation · Milarepa · Mahasiddha Tradition · Tibetan Vajrayana · Bon Yungdrung Bon · Theosophy