Book of Judges

← Encyclopedia

The Book of Judges is the seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the second of the narrative works that the Jewish canon, the Tanakh, counts among the Former Prophets — the sequence running from Joshua through Kings that carries Israel from the edge of the promised land to the loss of it. Its place in that order is itself an argument. Joshua closes on a people settled and a generation that has seen the works of its God; the Books of Samuel open on the demand for a king. Judges holds the long, dark interval between, and it is not one of the books of instruction — not the Torah, with its law and its wilderness, nor Numbers or Deuteronomy — but a chronicle of what the law looks like once the lawgiver and the conqueror are both dead and the people are left to keep faith on their own. In Hebrew it is Shoftim, after the figures it records: leaders raised up in moments of crisis, military and tribal rather than royal, whose office the book names with a word that means less a magistrate on a bench than a champion who sets things right by force when the order has come undone. The root carries both senses — to judge and to rule, to vindicate the wronged and to lead in war — and the figures of the book hold them together: a shofet is one who restores a broken right, and in this age that restoration is nearly always a sword. The placement in the Former Prophets is no accident of shelving. The Jewish ordering reads the whole run, Joshua to Kings, as a single prophetic interpretation of a people held to the terms of a covenant, and Judges is the second movement of that account — the proof, after the giving of the land, that the land could be lost, and the demonstration of exactly how.

The cycle

What gives the book its shape is a pattern set out almost as a thesis in its second prologue and then run, with deliberate variation, through the chapters that follow. The people abandon their God for the gods of the land around them, above all the storm-and-fertility god Baal and the powers of Canaan; the God of Israel gives them over to a foreign oppressor; under the weight of it they cry out; a deliverer is raised up, seized by a divine spirit, who breaks the oppressor and wins the land a generation of quiet; the deliverer dies, and the people relapse, deeper than before. The schema is stated at the head of the collection, where the narrator pauses to explain the whole age in advance: Israel served the Baals, was plundered and distressed, was rescued by judges it would not heed, and turned again — worse, the text insists, with each turning. The downward tilt is the point. The frame is not a wheel returning to the same place but a descending spiral, and as the book proceeds the clean fourfold rhythm of sin, servitude, supplication, and salvation begins to break down, the later deliverers more compromised than the earlier, the salvation less complete, until the frame can no longer hold the material at all and falls away entirely in the closing chapters.

The machinery of the cycle carries the book’s whole theology of this age. The apostasy is concrete, not abstract: Israel does not merely doubt but takes up the worship of the gods already in the land it has entered, the Baals and the Asherahs, the cults the conquest was meant to have erased and did not. The oppression that follows is read not as bad fortune but as the covenant working — the God of Israel handing the people over, as the law had warned, to the very neighbors whose gods they had run after. The deliverer, when he comes, is not chosen for merit; the book is careful that the salvation is unearned, granted because the people cried out and their God could not bear their misery, not because they had repented or deserved it. And the relapse is built into the structure: the peace lasts a generation and dies with the man who won it, so that the rescue never reforms the people, only postpones the next collapse. The age, in the book’s accounting, is one long demonstration that deliverance without return does not hold.

The gallery of deliverers

Around this frame the book gathers its figures, twelve in the counting that has come down, told at very unequal length. Six of them carry full narratives — the major judges — and the rest are noted in a line or two, names and years and a detail, the so-called minor judges who fill the intervals and lengthen the age. The first deliverers are brief and exemplary: Othniel, who fits the pattern cleanly, and the left-handed Ehud, who kills a Moabite king with a hidden blade. Then the book opens out. Deborah the prophetess sits in judgment under her palm and summons Barak to break a Canaanite army under Sisera, the rout sealed when a woman drives a tent peg through the fleeing general’s skull; the victory is sung in a poem of fierce, archaic Hebrew that stands among the oldest writing in the Bible. Gideon threshes wheat in secret for fear of Midianite raiders and is called from it, asks his God for a sign in a fleece wet with dew on dry ground and then a second sign reversed, and routs a host with three hundred men, torches, and trumpets — then makes of the gold an object the people worship, the deliverance already curdling. Jephthah, an outcast recalled to lead, swears that if he is given victory he will offer up whatever first comes from his door to meet him, and it is his daughter who comes out with timbrels and dancing. And Samson, the Nazirite whose strength lives in his uncut hair, burns the Philistines’ fields, is betrayed and blinded, and in his last act pulls down the pillars of their temple on himself and them. These lives are the book’s great inheritance, and the collection holds them at full strength even as the theological frame around them frays.

The descent into disorder

The frame does not so much conclude as collapse. The last five chapters drop the cycle of judges altogether and turn to two episodes of a society coming apart from within. In the first, a man named Micah sets up a private shrine with a cast idol and hires a wandering Levite to be his priest, and a migrating band of the tribe of Dan carries off both the idol and the priest to found a sanctuary of its own. In the second, the rape and death of a Levite’s concubine at Gibeah touches off a war of the other tribes against Benjamin that nearly wipes the tribe out, and the awkward measures taken afterward to keep it from extinction. No deliverer rises in these chapters; no enemy is foreign; the violence is Israel’s own. Stitched through them, four times and last of all as the book’s final sentence, is the refrain that in those days there was no king in Israel, and everyone did what was right in his own eyes. The line works two ways at once. It is plain chronology — the monarchy of Saul and David has not yet come — and it is a verdict, the closing judgment on an age in which, with no king on earth and the heavenly king forgotten, each person became the measure of his own conduct and the result was ruin.

The critical reading

Modern scholarship reads Judges as a composite work, drawing together older tribal traditions and tales of local heroes that were later pressed by editors into the cyclical, theological pattern that now binds them. The standard framework places the book within the Deuteronomistic History — the long narrative from Deuteronomy through Kings, unified by the outlook of Deuteronomy and its insistence that Israel’s fortunes rise and fall with its fidelity to its God. That framework was set out by Martin Noth in 1943, who argued that a single exilic historian wove inherited material into one continuous account explaining how a people given the land came to lose it; Noth took the cyclic editorial framework of Judges, the recurring formula of apostasy and deliverance, as that historian’s own hand laid over an older collection of hero stories. Later work multiplied the layers. Wolfgang Richter distinguished pre-Deuteronomistic redactions of the deliverer narratives beneath the exilic frame, and the double-edition model associated with Frank Moore Cross and Richard Nelson separated a first, hopeful redaction in the late seventh century BCE from a darker revision after Jerusalem fell in 587 BCE. The opening chapter, with its catalog of tribes that failed to drive out the inhabitants, and the first prologue down through the rebuke at Bochim are widely taken as a secondary frame added around an already-shaped book, so that Judges shows at least two hands of editorial framing wrapped around a core of much older tales.

Much of the debate concerns how far the deliverers, who in the oldest stories acted within single regions and against single enemies, were drawn into a national framework by that editing — local champions of a clan or a pair of tribes refashioned as saviors of all Israel, their staggered careers laid end to end into a single chronological age that the numbers in the text, added up, will not quite fit. The Song of Deborah in the fifth chapter is the test case for the book’s antiquity: its language is so unlike the prose around it — older verb forms, rare words, a relative particle elsewhere found late — that a long line of scholars has dated it to the twelfth or eleventh century BCE, within reach of the events it celebrates and centuries before the framework that now encloses it, while others read its strangeness as poetic license rather than age and argue for a later hand. The historical reach of the individual episodes is contested throughout, the question in each case how much memory survives inside a tale that has been retold for a theology it did not originally serve.

Text, study, and reception

The critical study of the book is gathered in the major commentaries. The Old Testament Library volume by J. Alberto Soggin (1981) was the standard for a generation before it was replaced in the same series by Susan Niditch’s Judges: A Commentary (2008), which attends closely to the literary and folkloric craft of the narratives and to their violence and their treatment of women; Jack Sasson’s Anchor Yale Bible commentary on the first twelve chapters (2014) reviews the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim reading of the text across two millennia alongside the modern scholarship. The compositional question — how Judges was joined to the books on either side of it — continues to draw fresh argument, surveyed in recent work such as the study of the formation of Judges and Samuel within the Deuteronomistic composition. The Hebrew text and its translations are freely readable, Judges on Sefaria presenting the Masoretic Hebrew with English in parallel. The wider introductions to the Hebrew Bible — Michael Coogan’s The Old Testament: A Historical and Literary Introduction to the Hebrew Scriptures among the most used — set the book in the sweep of the canon and the history of the Holy Land it describes.

Within the traditions that hold the book as scripture, its lesson has generally been read as a warning: faithfulness brings peace, turning away brings ruin, and deliverance comes only through return — the same covenantal logic that Deuteronomy lays down before the crossing and that the law of Sinai, the Ten Commandments at its head, sets as the standard the judges’ generation keeps failing to meet. Jewish tradition counted the book among the Prophets and read its refrain on the kingless age in two directions at once, as both a defense of the monarchy that follows and a reminder that the only true king is the one the people forgot. Christian readers found in its deliverers a roster of types and warnings, and singled out the names the New Testament names — the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews lists Gideon, Barak, Samson, and Jephthah among the heroes who conquered through faith, lifting the flawed champions of a violent book into a catalog of the faithful. The harder material — Jephthah’s vow, the herem and the carnage of the closing chapters, the treatment of the women in the Levite’s tale — has been held at varying distances by interpreters in both faiths, read as historical record, as moral test, or as a portrait of disorder the book means its reader to recoil from.

Its figures passed early into the wider imagination, and there they have stayed. Samson and Delilah, Gideon’s fleece, Deborah’s song under the palm, Jephthah’s daughter going out to meet her father — these have fed painting and sculpture from late antiquity onward, the oratorio and the opera, the stage and the screen, and a long tradition of moral and political commentary that has read the kingless age by turns as a caution against anarchy and as a warning against the kings that cured it. The book that supplied liturgy and exegesis to the synagogue and the church gave the wider culture a gallery of strong and broken figures it has never set down, drawn out of chapters far darker and stranger than the images they became.

→ Related: Joshua · Book Of Numbers · Holy Land · Books Of Samuel · David · Deborah · Samson · Tanakh · Torah · Deuteronomy · Canaan · Baal · Liturgy