Joris-Karl Huysmans

← Encyclopedia

A clerk’s desk in the rue de Grenelle held the working life of one of the most unsettling imaginations in French letters. Charles-Marie-Georges Huysmans spent roughly three decades inside the French Ministry of the Interior, rising through its bureaus and earning the Legion of Honor for that service, and the novels — the ones that carried Decadence to its furthest edge and then turned and walked the whole road back — were written around the official paperwork, in the hours that the administration did not own. He was born in Paris in 1848, of Dutch descent on his father’s side, a lineage that ran back to a family of Breda painters; he signed his books with the Dutch form of his given names, Joris-Karl, and kept the bureaucrat’s habit of exactitude even as his subjects grew stranger. He died in Paris in 1907. Between the two dates he tracked, in fiction, the whole crisis of belief in late nineteenth-century Paris — from aesthetic exhaustion through an immersion in the period’s occultism and Satanism to a return, hard-won, to the Catholic Church.

From Médan to the breviary of Decadence

He came up inside Émile Zola’s circle and began as a Naturalist, committed to the unvarnished documentary method the movement prized: observation over invention, the case study over the romance, the working life of the poor and the petit bourgeois set down without softening. His earliest books — Marthe (1876), the story of a prostitute; Les Sœurs Vatard (1879), set among bookbinding workgirls; En ménage (1881) — belong squarely to that program, and his story “Sac au dos,” an unglamorous soldier’s-eye account of the Franco-Prussian war, appeared in Les Soirées de Médan (1880), the collective volume that announced the Naturalist school to a hostile public and bound Huysmans publicly to Zola and the young Guy de Maupassant. He also made himself the period’s most acute champion of the Impressionists, defending Degas and the independents in the art criticism collected as L’Art moderne (1883) when official taste still recoiled from them. What separated him from the school even then was temperament: a connoisseur’s eye that found in modern ugliness not a thesis to prove but a texture to savor, a prose of almost morbid precision, and a deepening pull — traceable to his reading of Schopenhauer — toward pessimism and disgust rather than toward the optimistic determinism Naturalism officially professed.

He broke with the school in À rebours (1884), the novel of the reclusive aesthete Jean Des Esseintes, last sickly heir of an exhausted noble line, who withdraws from a world he finds vulgar into a private museum of rare sensation at Fontenay-aux-Roses. The chapters are less a plot than an inventory — of Latin decadent authors, of jewels set into the shell of a living tortoise, of perfumes composed like symphonies, of a mouth-organ of liqueurs — and the cumulative effect is a portrait of a sensibility that has used up nature and turned to artifice as a higher reality. Zola received it as a betrayal of the method; Huysmans, in a preface written twenty years later, said it had detonated like a bomb under Naturalism and left him no obvious road forward. The book became the breviary of the Decadent movement, the period’s most quoted statement of art turned against nature, and crossed the Channel as the nameless “poisonous” yellow-bound volume that corrupts the hero of Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray — a borrowing Wilde half-acknowledged at his own trial. Yet the last page of À rebours already names the impasse Huysmans would spend the rest of his life inside: Des Esseintes, his nerves wrecked and his refuge collapsing, faces a choice between the muzzle of a pistol and the foot of the cross, and the narrator can offer him neither faith nor unbelief, only the cry of a man shipwrecked between the two.

Là-Bas and the occult revival

The work that places Huysmans in the history of Western esotericism is Là-Bas (1891), often rendered Down There. Its protagonist, Durtal — Huysmans’s recurring self-portrait, a fastidious writer disgusted with his age — undertakes a study of the fifteenth-century Breton marshal and child-murderer Gilles de Rais, companion-in-arms of Joan of Arc, who descended from battlefield glory into alchemy, the conjuration of demons, and the torture and killing of children before his trial and execution at Nantes in 1440. As Durtal reconstructs that medieval horror, the framing conversations of the novel pull him into a contemporary underworld he had assumed long dead: the Parisian Satanism of his own decade, a thread that culminates in a scene of the Black Mass celebrated by a renegade priest, Canon Docre, in a deconsecrated chapel. The Gilles de Rais chapters are themselves a feat of the documentary method turned on the Middle Ages: Huysmans worked from the surviving trial records, weighing the confessions extracted under threat of excommunication, the heresy charges, and the conjurations of demons attempted by the marshal’s Italian alchemist, against the chronicle of a man who had fought beside a saint and ended on the gallows. Around that core Huysmans built a deliberate diptych — the historical abyss and the modern one set face to face — and gave his theory a name. The preface-conversation of the first chapter rejects Zola’s materialism without abandoning its discipline: Durtal calls instead for a naturalisme spirituel, a spiritual naturalism, realism turned upon the soul and the supernatural, keeping the documentary eye while admitting what the documentary creed had ruled out.

The novel drew on a milieu that was, in 1891, vividly alive. The capital of the revival was a real geography of bookshops, lecture rooms, and rented apartments — the world of occult Paris — where the magical synthesis of Éliphas Lévi — the renamer of magic, founder of modern occultisme — had hardened, a generation after his death, into orders, congresses, and journals, drawing on Christian Kabbalah, gnostic revivalism, and the planes-and-races cosmology of Theosophy by turns. The institutional engine of that French occult revival was Papus, Gérard Encausse, who with the poet Stanislas de Guaita and the self-styled Sâr Joséphin Péladan had founded in 1888 the Ordre Kabbalistique de la Rose-Croix, an “occult university” awarding symbolic doctorates in Kabbalah — the Christian-occultist Kabbalah systematized into a transmissible curriculum, the Martinist and Rosicrucian currents braided together. Huysmans knew this world from its margins and read its quarrels closely. His single most important informant was the schismatic priest and self-styled mystic Joseph-Antoine Boullan, a defrocked cleric who led a tiny sect of survivors of the Vintras movement at Lyon and who claimed to combat the Parisian magicians by counter-sorcery. Boullan furnished Huysmans with the lore of contemporary diabolism that fills Là-Bas, appears in the novel transfigured as the healer-mystic Doctor Johannes, and stood at the center of a real and bitter feud: Guaita’s Rose-Croix circle accused Boullan of sacrilege and worse, Boullan answered with charges of magical attack, and when Boullan died at Lyon in January 1893 Huysmans publicly blamed the Paris magi for killing him at a distance — a charge that drew Guaita to the edge of a duel. The arch-Satanist Docre, for his part, was modeled on an actual Bruges clergyman, the abbé Louis Van Haecke, whom Huysmans never proved to be anything of the kind.

What Là-Bas records is therefore partly reportage: a writer carrying his documentary habit into territory most of his contemporaries treated as either fraud or sensation, and treating the occult revival as a phenomenon to be described from the inside rather than a joke to be dismissed. But the reporting ran through a single unreliable channel. Almost everything Huysmans knew of a living Satanic cult he had from Boullan, a man with every motive to inflate the power of his enemies, and later scholarship has found little independent evidence that the Black Mass Durtal witnesses corresponded to any standing rite. The documentary surface conceals an invention; the spiritual hunger beneath it is the real subject. Robert Baldick, whose 1955 biography remains the standard account, reads the book less as a survey of an existing cult than as a record of Huysmans’s own desperation — a man who had exhausted aestheticism and could not yet believe, probing the darkness because it was at least not the void. To descend toward the Black Mass was, for him, already to grant that the sacred was real enough to be inverted.

The Durtal cycle and the road to Rome

He observed this world; he did not practice in it. The same investigation that carried Durtal toward the Black Mass carried Huysmans, over the following decade, toward the Church — and the logic was his own. If the desecrated Host had power, the consecrated Host had more; the demonic was intelligible only as a parasite on the divine. The three novels that follow Là-Bas form a continuous spiritual itinerary, the most sustained conversion narrative in modern French fiction, with Durtal as Huysmans’s barely-disguised double at every step.

En route (1895) takes Durtal on retreat to a Trappist monastery, rendered as Notre-Dame de l’Âtre — drawn directly from Huysmans’s own stays at the Cistercian abbey of Notre-Dame d’Igny in the summers of 1892, 1893, and 1894, the first of which (12–20 July 1892) was the crisis that completed his return to the faith. The book is an anatomy of Christian mysticism as experienced by a hypersensitive aesthete: the terror of the confessional, the austerity of the Trappist horarium, the violent dryness and sudden consolations of the early contemplative life, the plainchant heard as a sensory revelation. Huysmans applied the naturalist’s exactitude to the interior weather of a soul, and the result scandalized as thoroughly in one direction as Là-Bas had in the other. La Cathédrale (1898) is built around the symbolism of Chartres — the iconography of its stained glass and statuary, the mystical meanings read into its stones, the whole medieval art of building a theology in glass and stone — as Durtal, now an oblate-in-the-making, studies the cathedral as a legible scripture. L’Oblat (1903) follows him into the life of a Benedictine oblate attached to a monastery, tracing the daily texture of monastic discipline, the liturgical year, and the Mass as the center of a sacramental order — the station Huysmans himself had taken at the abbey of Ligugé, near Poitiers.

The biography behind the late fiction is precise. Having retired from the Ministry, Huysmans settled in June 1899 at the Maison Notre-Dame he had built beside the monks at Ligugé; he entered the novitiate of the abbey on 18 March 1900 and made his profession as a Benedictine oblate on 21 March 1901. The oasis, as he called it in his diary, lasted barely two and a half years: the anticlerical Law on Associations of 1901 forced the congregation into exile, and Huysmans returned to Paris that September, the monastery he had joined dispersed almost as soon as he had entered it. He had by then been chosen, in 1900, as the first president of the newly constituted Académie Goncourt, the literary academy endowed by his old Naturalist confrère Edmond de Goncourt — a quiet emblem of how completely the converted oblate remained, to the end, a man of letters. His last years were given to Sainte Lydwine de Schiedam (1901), a life of a medieval mystic whose extreme physical suffering Huysmans read as redemptive substitution — the doctrine of réversibilité, by which one soul bears the penalties owed by others — and to Les Foules de Lourdes (1906). The late books read his earlier fascination with Satanism in reverse: as the negative proof of a sacred order he had been circling all along.

He died of cancer of the jaw on 12 May 1907, the disease borne, by his own account, in that same key of expiatory suffering. The Requiem was celebrated at Notre-Dame-des-Champs by the abbé Mugnier, the priest-confidant of literary Paris, and he was buried at Montparnasse in the Benedictine oblate’s habit.

Reading, scholarship, and the texts

Huysmans is the fin-de-siècle religious mood’s most exacting fictional witness, and the scholarship treats him on exactly that footing: not as a thinker who advanced occult doctrine, but as the writer through whom the period’s spiritual crisis became legible. The foundational modern study is Robert Baldick, The Life of J.-K. Huysmans (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955; revised edition Sawtry: Dedalus, 2007), which set Là-Bas firmly within Huysmans’s own occult explorations and established the cautionary reading of the novel as spiritual autobiography rather than cult ethnography (catalog record). For the diabolism of Là-Bas in its real historical setting, the authoritative recent treatment is Ruben van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), whose chapter “Huysmans and Consorts” (Oxford Academic) reconstructs the Boullan–Guaita feud and assesses how much of the novel’s Satanism descends from Boullan’s unreliable testimony. The earliest extended treatment of Huysmans’s occult sources is the period memoir-criticism of Joanny Bricaud, J.-K. Huysmans et le satanisme (Paris: Chacornac, 1913), itself a document of the milieu it describes.

The primary texts are largely available in the public domain. À rebours (1884) and Là-Bas (1891) circulate in the original French and in early English translation; the Keene Wallace English version of Là-Bas is hosted by Project Gutenberg (ebook #14323). The French first editions and their later printings — À rebours, Là-Bas, and Huysmans’s own studies of regional witch-lore — survive in clean scans on Wikimedia Commons and the Bibliothèque nationale’s Gallica. Read across the whole arc, the novels are among the fullest contemporary records of the fin-de-siècle religious mood: the sense that materialism had emptied the world, and that what rushed in to fill it might be holiness or its inversion, often hard to tell apart.

→ Related: Magic · Gnosis · Theosophy · Gilles De Rais · French Occultism · Occult Paris · Notre Dame De Chartres · Catholic Mass · Monasticism · Christian Mysticism · Esotericism · Occultism