Jerome

← Encyclopedia

Jerome — Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus, c. 342–420 — was a Latin Christian scholar, ascetic, and biblical translator whose rendering of scripture into Latin, later called the Vulgate, became the standard Bible of the Western Church for more than a thousand years. He is counted among the four great Latin Fathers, and is the patron, in later tradition, of translators and librarians. No one in the Latin West did more to fix the words in which Europe would hear God speak, and no one labored harder to anchor those words in the languages God had first used.

Born at Stridon, on the edge of the Roman province of Dalmatia, he was educated at Rome in grammar and rhetoric and came late and uneasily to the ascetic life. The classroom shaped him permanently: he learned to read with the close, combative attention of the grammarian, to prize the exact word, and to revere the Latin masters whose cadences he would never wholly shed. He was baptized at Rome around 360. A famous passage in his letters records a dream in which he was dragged before a heavenly judge and condemned for loving the pagan classics — a Ciceronian, the Judge said, not a Christian — more than the gospel; the anxiety of the trained Latinist who could not stop admiring his Cicero runs through everything he wrote. He spent years in the Syrian desert, learned Greek and then, unusually for a Latin of his day, Hebrew, and served briefly as secretary to Pope Damasus in Rome before settling for the rest of his life in a monastery at Bethlehem.

The road to the desert and to Hebrew

The shape of Jerome’s career was set by a long arc eastward and an even longer arc inward. After Rome he traveled to Trier and then to Aquileia, where he attached himself to an ascetic circle that included Rufinus of Aquileia, the friend who would one day become his most bitter enemy. From there he went east, and between roughly 374 and 379 lived the ascetic life in the desert of Chalcis, southwest of Antioch — a stretch he later mythologized as a season of scorpions, fasting, and feverish dreams of Roman dancing-girls, but which was also, decisively, when he began to study Hebrew under a converted Jew. This was the rarest of accomplishments for a Latin Christian. Greek was the common tongue of educated faith; Hebrew was the preserve of the synagogue, and Jerome’s willingness to sit at the feet of Jewish teachers — to acquire what he called the Hebraica veritas, the Hebrew truth — would become both his greatest tool and a standing reproach in the mouths of his critics, who muttered that he had gone over to the Jews. He was ordained priest at Antioch by Bishop Paulinus, though he never functioned as a parish clergyman; he then spent 380 to 381 at Constantinople, where he heard Gregory of Nazianzus, one of the great Cappadocian teachers, and absorbed the exegetical methods of the Greek East, above all those descending from Origen of Alexandria.

From 382 to 385 he was back in Rome, attached to Pope Damasus, who set him the task that would define his life: to revise the chaotic Old Latin translations of the gospels against the Greek. The court at Rome admired his learning and recoiled from his tongue. He preached the rigors of asceticism to aristocratic Roman households, denounced the worldliness of the clergy, and gathered around him a circle of devout, wealthy women whose intelligence he treated as the equal of any man’s. When Damasus died in 384 his protection vanished; rumor and hostility drove Jerome from the city, and he sailed east, never to return.

Bethlehem and the ascetic circle

By way of Antioch and Alexandria — where he sat at the lectures of the blind exegete Didymus — he reached Bethlehem in 386 and settled there for the remaining three decades of his life. He founded a monastery for men; nearby, the Roman widow Paula and her daughter Eustochium founded and funded a convent for women and a hostel for pilgrims. These were not patrons in the background. Paula had followed Jerome from Rome, sold her vast inheritance to endow the Bethlehem houses, and studied Hebrew alongside him with such success that he said she chanted the psalms in the original without a trace of a Latin accent. Eustochium, to whom he addressed his most famous letter on the keeping of virginity, was his lifelong collaborator and, after Paula’s death, the head of the women’s community. The intellectual partnership of these Roman noblewomen with the great translator is one of the most remarkable features of his career — a detail later piety tended to soften into mere devotion. The scriptorium they sustained, the books they paid copyists to gather, and the questions they pressed on him in correspondence were the material conditions of the Vulgate. His commentaries are studded with answers to Paula’s and Eustochium’s queries; some of his most demanding translations were undertaken at their request.

The Vulgate and the Hebraica veritas

His great labor was the text of scripture. Commissioned by Damasus to revise the Old Latin gospels, he went much further, eventually translating most of the Old Testament afresh from the Hebrew rather than from the Greek Septuagint that the Church had long treated as inspired. The progression was gradual and reveals a mind changing under the pressure of its own evidence. First he revised the Latin gospels (and probably touched the rest of the New Testament) against the Greek. Then, at Bethlehem, he revised the Latin Psalter against the Greek of Origen’s Hexapla, producing the version that, adopted in Gaul, came to be called the Gallican Psalter and remained the liturgical psalter of the West for centuries. But correcting Latin against Greek satisfied him less and less. Between roughly 390 and 405 he undertook the audacious task of translating the Hebrew books directly — Samuel and Kings, the Prophets, Job, the Psalms again (this time iuxta Hebraeos, “according to the Hebrews”), Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Song of Songs, Ezra, Chronicles, and the rest. He rendered the Aramaic Tobit and Judith hastily, he claimed, in deference to church usage, while regarding them as standing outside the strict canon.

The decision was controversial: Augustine, among others, worried that going behind the Greek would unsettle congregations and break the unity of East and West. Jerome’s insistence on the Hebraica veritas, the “Hebrew truth,” set a principle that would echo through the Renaissance and the Reformation, when humanists and reformers again reached past received versions toward the original tongues. The stakes were not merely philological. The Septuagint had been the Bible of the apostles, quoted in the Gospels and the epistles; to declare that its readings sometimes diverged from the Hebrew, and that the Hebrew was the arbiter, was to suggest that the inspired Greek of the Church might be, in places, simply wrong. In the prologues he prefixed to the translated books — above all the so-called Helmeted Prologue (Prologus Galeatus) to Samuel and Kings — Jerome laid out a Hebrew canon of twenty-two books, matched to the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, and consigned the books found only in the Greek (Wisdom, Sirach, Judith, Tobit, the books of Maccabees, and the Greek additions to Esther and Daniel) to a second rank he called the apocrypha: edifying, readable in church, but not to be used to establish doctrine. This distinction lay dormant for a millennium and then detonated in the sixteenth century, when Protestant reformers appealed to Jerome’s own authority to strip the deuterocanonical books from their Bibles, and the Catholic Council of Trent (1546) responded by declaring the Vulgate the authentic Latin text of scripture and the longer canon binding. The canon itself belongs to the history of the Bible; what belongs to Jerome is the translator’s fateful conviction that getting the words right could matter more than keeping the peace.

The quarrels

Alongside the translation he produced commentaries, polemical tracts, and a vast correspondence, much of it ferocious. He quarreled with former friends, denounced opponents in print, and championed virginity and the monastic life in terms that made him enemies; scholarship generally reads him as a writer of real genius and real venom in roughly equal measure. He also gathered around him a circle of learned Roman women — Paula and her daughter Eustochium chief among them — whose patronage and study made the Bethlehem work possible, a detail later piety tended to soften.

Two feuds in particular have come to define his combativeness. The first was with Rufinus over the legacy of Origen. The two had been close friends from their youth at Aquileia, and both had drunk deeply from Origen’s allegorical exegesis. But when the Origenist controversy broke out in Palestine in the 390s — a campaign, led in part by Epiphanius of Salamis, to brand a cluster of Origen’s speculations (the pre-existence of souls, the eventual salvation of all things) as heresy — Jerome abruptly disowned the master he had once praised. Around 397 Rufinus published at Rome a Latin translation of Origen’s On First Principles, softening or omitting the passages most open to a heretical reading, and in his preface implied that Jerome shared his admiration for the work. Jerome, stung, produced his own brutally literal translation to expose what Origen had actually written, and the two old friends fell into a public exchange of accusations — Rufinus’s Apology, Jerome’s Apology against Rufinus — of a savagery extraordinary even by the standards of patristic polemic. They never reconciled; when Rufinus died, Jerome’s notice of it was graceless.

The second feud was gentler in tone but weightier in substance: a long, guarded correspondence with Augustine of Hippo, the other towering Latin mind of the age. Augustine, decades younger and not yet the colossus he would become, wrote to challenge Jerome on two points. He thought Jerome wrong to read the clash between Peter and Paul at Antioch (Galatians 2) as a staged performance rather than a genuine rebuke — for if the apostles could lie for expediency, Augustine argued, the truthfulness of all scripture was in danger. And he thought the whole project of translating from the Hebrew reckless. Augustine reported a telling incident: a North African bishop had introduced Jerome’s new rendering of Jonah in his church, and when the congregation reached the plant that shaded the prophet — Jerome had written ivy where the Old Latin, following the Greek, had long said gourd — there was an uproar, the Greeks in particular denouncing the new text as false, and the bishop was forced to back down rather than lose his flock. The single Hebrew word (the kikayon, which Jerome held was strictly neither gourd nor ivy) became, in Augustine’s hands, an argument that a community’s settled Bible was a fragile and precious thing, not lightly to be disturbed. Jerome bristled at being lectured by a younger man, suspected him of fishing for a reputation at the famous translator’s expense, and answered with prickly condescension; only slowly did the two arrive at a wary, mutual respect.

Histories, lives, and letters

The Vulgate has overshadowed an output of staggering range. Jerome compiled the De viris illustribus (392–393), a catalog of Christian authors modeled on Suetonius and the first attempt at a Christian literary history. He translated and continued the Chronicle of Eusebius of Caesarea, giving the Latin West its basic framework of universal chronology synchronized across empires and dynasties. He wrote lives of desert hermits — Paul of Thebes, Hilarion, the captive Malchus — that helped carry the ideal of Egyptian and Syrian monasticism into Latin imagination. His biblical commentaries, especially on the prophets, remain mines of philological and rabbinic learning, preserving Jewish interpretive traditions that would otherwise be lost. And his letters — more than a hundred and twenty survive — are among the finest in the Latin language: by turns tender, learned, scabrous, and self-dramatizing, they are the closest thing late antiquity has to a sustained self-portrait of a working scholar.

The most famous of them, Letter 22 to Eustochium, written at Rome around 384, contains the dream that has fixed his self-understanding ever after. Carried in spirit before the judgment seat, asked who he was, Jerome answered that he was a Christian — and was told, in the NPNF rendering, that he lied: a follower of Cicero, not of Christ. He was ordered to be scourged, and swore that if he ever again possessed or read worldly books he would have denied his Lord. Whether he kept the oath is doubtful — Ciceronian rhythms haunt his prose to the end — but the dream names the permanent tension of his life and of the whole humanist strand of Christian learning: the believer who cannot give up the beauty of the pagan word, and is not sure he should have to.

What he established

What he established outlasted the quarrels. The Vulgate shaped the Latin in which Western Europe thought about God for a millennium, and the ideal he embodied — the scholar in his study, bent over the original languages, willing to correct a sacred text in the name of getting it right — became one of the durable images of Christian learning. When Renaissance humanists raised the cry ad fontes, “back to the sources,” they were following the path Jerome had cut; when Luther and Calvin went behind the Vulgate to the Hebrew and Greek, they were, against the Church that revered him, using Jerome’s own weapon. His distinction between canon and apocrypha became one of the fault lines of the Reformation. And the Vulgate itself, formally enshrined by Trent and standardized in the Clementine edition of 1592, remained the liturgical and doctrinal Bible of the Roman rite until the late twentieth century.

The study, the lion of legend at his feet, the open book: the picture stayed long after the controversies were forgotten. The lion is the touch the imagination could not resist — a tale that surfaces only centuries after his death, in which Jerome drew a thorn from a beast’s paw and gained a tame companion, almost certainly borrowed from the legend of the hermit Gerasimus by way of the similarity of their names, and carried into the late-medieval West by the Golden Legend. It is fitting that the most learned and least sentimental of the Fathers should be remembered through a story he never told, beside an animal he never met. The truth he cared about lay in the words on the page, and those he got, by his lights, right.

Texts and scholarship

The standard English access to Jerome’s letters and select works is the nineteenth-century Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series, second series volume 6, translated by W. H. Fremantle and edited by Philip Schaff — a public-domain text hosted in full by the Christian Classics Ethereal Library, including the famous Letter 22 to Eustochium with its account of the Ciceronian dream. The individual letters and treatises are also freely available in the parallel New Advent Fathers edition, where the Augustine–Jerome correspondence on the Galatians dispute and the kikayon of Jonah can be read in full. The Latin text of Jerome’s vast output is gathered in J.-P. Migne’s Patrologia Latina (volumes 22–30), itself long in the public domain.

The standard modern biography is J. N. D. Kelly’s Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies (London: Duckworth, 1975), the first full-scale English Life and still the indispensable narrative; Kelly is also notable for arguing an earlier birth date (c. 331) than the conventional c. 342–347, a question the sources leave genuinely open. Megan Hale Williams’s The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006) reconstructs the material world of the Bethlehem scriptorium and Jerome’s invention of the figure of the Christian scholar. On the Vulgate as a translation, the entry of the Hebraica veritas, and the canon question, the freely available summary in the Catholic Encyclopedia remains a careful starting point, and the dossier of the Augustine–Jerome translation letters assembles the primary correspondence on the controversy. For Jerome’s place in the long Latin Christian reckoning with dreams — the frame within which the Ciceronian vision was read by later theologians — the relevant analysis runs from Augustine’s vision-typology through Gregory the Great and Thomas Aquinas.

→ Related: Basil Of Caesarea · Justin Martyr · Philo Of Alexandria · Martin Luther · John Calvin · Jesus Christ · Augustine Of Hippo · Origen · Bible · Old Testament · Cicero · The Reformation · Western Monasticism