I Ching

← Encyclopedia

The I Ching, or Book of Changes (Yijing), is the oldest of the Chinese classics: a divination manual built around sixty-four hexagrams, each a stack of six broken or unbroken lines, to which short oracular texts are attached. The hexagrams are generated by a procedure of chance — anciently the sorting of yarrow stalks, later the tossing of three coins — and the result is read as a figure of the moment, a diagnosis of how a situation stands and where it is tending. The Chinese title turns on a single idea: yi, change. The book’s subject is not fixed fortune but the patterns by which one circumstance gives way to the next.

Its core is old and its growth is long. The earliest stratum, the Zhou Yi, took shape in the early centuries of the Zhou dynasty, in the first millennium BCE; tradition credits the legendary sage-king Fu Xi with the trigrams, King Wen and the Duke of Zhou with the hexagram and line statements, attributions that scholarship treats as later legend rather than history. Around this nucleus accreted a body of commentary known as the Ten Wings (Shi Yi), which philosophy gradually folded into the work itself. These wings — long ascribed to Confucius, though modern study dates them to the late Warring States and Han periods — turned a diviner’s handbook into a cosmological text. They read the hexagrams as a complete language of the world’s transformations, governed by the interplay of yin and yang.

That double character has held ever since. To some readers the Yijing is an oracle, consulted before a decision; to others it is a wisdom-book whose images repay study apart from any throw of the stalks. Confucian, Daoist, and later Neo-Confucian thinkers all claimed it, and under the Song dynasty its commentary became a central arena of philosophical work, the hexagrams pressed into service as a map of cosmic and moral order. The book absorbed each reading without being exhausted by any.

Its Western career is more recent. Jesuit missionaries reported on it from the seventeenth century; James Legge produced a scholarly English version in the nineteenth. The translation that carried it into wide circulation, however, was Richard Wilhelm’s German rendering of the early 1920s, later Englished, for which Carl Jung supplied a foreword arguing that the oracle worked not by causation but by what he called synchronicity — a meaningful coincidence between the inner question and the outer fall of the lines. Jung’s framing is his own interpretation, not a claim the text makes for itself, and it shaped how a century of Western readers approached the book. Whether one comes to it as oracle, as classic, or as psychological mirror, the Changes offers the same austere materials: sixty-four figures, and the spaces between them.

→ Related: Divination · Song Dynasty