Gospel of Thomas

← Encyclopedia

The Gospel of Thomas is a collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus, preserved complete in a fourth-century Coptic manuscript that surfaced among the Nag Hammadi codices in Upper Egypt in 1945. It carries almost no narrative: no birth, no miracles, no crucifixion, no resurrection — only the sayings themselves, strung one after another, each introduced with little more than the formula Jesus said. The text opens by calling them the secret words spoken by the living Jesus and written down by Didymos Judas Thomas, and it lays a charge on the reader at once: whoever finds the interpretation of these words will not taste death. Everything that follows is offered as that interpretive task. The gospel does not narrate a life and then draw a lesson; it withholds the lesson and hands over the words, and salvation is made to turn on what the reader does with them.

The name is a knot worth untangling. Didymos is Greek for twin; Thomas is Aramaic for the same. The figure invoked is the apostle remembered in the canon as Thomas, called Didymus — here doubled, twin upon twin, around the name Judas, and made the guarantor of a private transmission. The attribution is pseudonymous, a claim of authority rather than a record of authorship, of a kind common to the apocrypha; it ties the sayings to Thomas the Apostle and to the eastern, Syriac-speaking Christianity that took him as its founding figure, the same milieu that produced the Acts of Thomas and the Hymn of the Pearl. The gospel is not by the apostle; it speaks under his cover, in the convention by which a school signed its master’s lineage rather than its scribe’s hand.

The text before the desert

Before the Nag Hammadi find the work was known only by name and by three Greek fragments recovered from the rubbish mounds of Oxyrhynchus in Egypt by Bernard Grenfell and Arthur Hunt around the turn of the twentieth century. The first, cataloged as Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1 and published in 1897, carried a column of unattributed sayings of Jesus; two more, P.Oxy. 654 and 655, followed in 1904. For decades they floated free, a tantalizing scrap of a lost sayings-collection no one could name. Only after the Coptic Thomas emerged in 1945 — and was made legible to scholarship in the following years — could the fragments be matched to it: P.Oxy. 654 to the prologue and the first handful of sayings, P.Oxy. 1 to a middle cluster, P.Oxy. 655 to others, the Greek and the Coptic agreeing closely enough to be the same work and diverging enough to be different recensions of it. The fragments are dated to the second and third centuries, which fixes the text in circulation by around 200 at the latest and pushes its composition earlier still. One of the Greek sayings has no counterpart in the Coptic, a reminder that the collection was living and edited, not a sealed book.

The dating that will not settle

Roughly half the sayings have close parallels in the canonical gospels — the mustard seed, the lost sheep, the sower, render unto Caesar — while the others run beside them or away from them entirely. On the weight of those parallels the study of Thomas has split, and the split is among the most consequential in the study of Christian origins. One school reads Thomas as an independent and possibly very early witness to the sayings of Jesus, a stream of oral tradition shaped before the gospel writers fixed those sayings into a life story: Helmut Koester and Stephen Patterson argued that its terse, un-narrated form is the older shape of the material, and April DeConick has tried to peel back a primitive kernel gospel from later accretions. Another school holds it a later, derivative compilation that knows the canonical texts and reworks them — Nicholas Perrin proposed it was composed in Syriac in dependence on Tatian’s gospel-harmony, the Diatessaron, which would place it well into the second century. The proposals range across more than a century of possible composition, from the 50s to the 140s. The dispute has not been settled, and the evidence is genuinely double-edged: the same saying can be read as a purer earlier form or as a deliberate later abridgment, and the collection’s loose, accretive structure makes any single date a date for only part of it.

Salvation as recognition

Many of the distinctive sayings turn inward, and they turn the expected direction of Jesus’s central proclamation inside out. Where the kingdom of God in the canon is largely a thing that comes — breaking in, drawing near, arriving on a day — in Thomas it is already here and unrecognized. It is not in the sky, or the birds would arrive first; not in the sea, or the fish would; it is spread out upon the earth, and people do not see it. It is within and without. To enter it is not to wait or to obey but to know oneself and to recognize one’s origin in the light: those who come to know themselves will find they are the children of the living Father. Salvation here is recognition, not belief and not obedience — a waking from forgetfulness rather than a verdict at the end of time. What is brought forth from within saves; what is left unspoken within destroys. The light a person carries is the light that lit the world at its first day, and to find it is to find that one was never elsewhere than home.

This is the emphasis — knowing over believing, the divine recognized as one’s own hidden origin — that places Thomas in the orbit of gnosis, the salvific knowing that names a whole family of late-antique currents, and that for a long time made it read simply as a gnostic gospel. The grouping is natural enough: it was buried alongside the developed Gnostic writings of the Nag Hammadi cache, in the same Coptic, by the same kind of reader. But recent scholarship is more careful, and the kinship has loosened under examination. Thomas lacks the machinery that defines the developed Gnostic systems — no fallen Sophia, no botched creation, no malevolent demiurge who fashioned a prison-cosmos, no captive divine spark to be extracted from matter, none of the elaborate emanationist genealogy that Irenaeus cataloged in the Valentinians and that Ptolemy the Gnostic set out in his system. Its cosmos is not denounced as a mistake. Several of its sayings actively resist the dualist reading. What it shares with the late-antique gnosis of the Iranian-Mesopotamian world and with the Christian heterodoxies is a posture — the self as exile from light, knowledge as the path home — rather than a cosmology. The kinship is real and worth tracing; the identification is looser than it once seemed, and treating Thomas as a finished Gnostic system reads into it a myth it never tells.

Named by its opponents, kept by its enemies’ silence

What is not in doubt is the early Church’s verdict. Thomas circulated outside the boundary that hardened into the New Testament, and it was known to the writers who policed that boundary. A “Gospel according to Thomas” is named with disapproval by Origen of Alexandria in the third century, listed among the gospels the heterodox had written rather than received; Hippolytus cites a saying close to one in the collection and assigns it to a Gnostic group. Even Clement of Alexandria, who was willing to quote freely from writings outside the canon and who claimed the very word gnosis for orthodox Christianity, transmits sayings of the Thomas type without granting them scriptural standing. To be named by these writers was already to be excluded: they cite such texts the way a fence cites the field beyond it. The collection did not survive in the Christian East as a read and copied book. It survived as a buried copy, sealed in a jar in the sand near a monastery, kept by the accident of its concealment rather than by any living transmission — the one complete witness preserved precisely because it had dropped out of use.

The text, the editions, the scholarship

The standard critical apparatus rests on the Coptic of Nag Hammadi Codex II, tractate 2, set beside the three Greek fragments. The fragments were first published by Grenfell and Hunt in the Oxyrhynchus Papyri and in their small volumes ΛΟΓΙΑ ΙΗΣΟΥ: Sayings of Our Lord (1897) and New Sayings of Jesus (1904) — the originals are cataloged and imaged by the Oxyrhynchus Papyri project at Oxford. Thomas O. Lambdin’s English of the Coptic became the working translation through James M. Robinson’s The Nag Hammadi Library in English and Marvin Meyer’s later The Nag Hammadi Scriptures (2007), both in copyright and so cited rather than reproduced here. The independence case is argued at length in Stephen Patterson and James Robinson’s The Fifth Gospel and in Patterson’s earlier study of the text and the Jesus tradition; April DeConick’s The Original Gospel of Thomas in Translation (2007) reconstructs her layered kernel hypothesis with the full saying-by-saying apparatus, listed among her scholarly publications. The fullest recent commentary defending a later, derivative dating is Simon Gathercole’s The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary (2014). The very category of Gnosticism into which the text was first sorted is itself reassessed in Michael Williams’s Rethinking “Gnosticism” (1996) and Karen King’s What Is Gnosticism? (2003), both of which bear directly on how loosely or tightly Thomas should be tied to the systems beside which it was buried. For the synoptic comparison itself, the parallel Greek-and-English columns maintained by the University of Toronto’s gospel-synopsis project lay the fragments against the Coptic line by line.

The sayings end without conclusion, as they began, on the bare authority of the voice that speaks them. There is no last scene, no sealing miracle, no death and return to certify the words — only the opening charge it began with: find the interpretation, and do not taste death. A gospel that refuses to tell a story leaves the work where it placed it at the start, in the hands of whoever is reading.

→ In the library: Mead — Fragments of a Faith Forgotten (1906): the uncanonical Acts of Thomas · Mead — Fragments of a Faith Forgotten (1906): the Gnosis according to its foes

→ Related: Gnosis · Apocrypha · Nag Hammadi Library · Gnosticism · New Testament · Jesus Christ · Thomas The Apostle · Kingdom Of God · Irenaeus · Hippolytus · Origen · Clement Of Alexandria · Ptolemy The Gnostic · Late Antique Iranian Mesopotamian Gnosis