Fortuna

← Encyclopedia

Fortuna was the Roman goddess of chance — the power that grants and withholds, raises and ruins, with no regard for desert. Her name shares a root with fors, the Latin word for what happens by accident, and the Romans worshipped her in that double character: as the giver of increase and good outcome, and as the sheer unpredictability that no offering could finally bind. She was not a moral power. She rewarded no virtue and punished no fault; she simply turned, and the just rode down with the wicked. To honor her at all was to acknowledge that the margin between safety and ruin lay outside the reach of merit, and to court the one force that could not be reasoned with.

That she should be courted so widely is itself a statement about the Roman world. The elder Pliny, writing in the first century of the empire, observed that across the whole world, in every place and at every hour, Fortuna alone is the deity men call upon — alone praised, alone blamed, alone held to account — as if she had absorbed the offices of all the rest. The remark is half a complaint about a credulous age, but it records something true of the cult’s reach: a goddess whose province was precisely the residue that the other gods, with their fixed spheres and reciprocal bargains, could not cover.

The regal origin

The cult was old, and Roman tradition pushed it back to the regal period. It credited the early king Servius Tullius — himself a man of obscure birth raised to the throne, and so a fitting client — with founding several of her shrines. The legend bound the two together with unusual intimacy: Servius was held to be not merely her devotee but her beloved, the king the goddess favored and even loved, which made his story the pattern case of what Fortuna does — she takes the nameless and sets him on a throne, and the same hand can take it away. Two of her oldest temples stood across the Tiber on the right bank, in the district later called Trastevere, dedicated to her as Fors Fortuna; the second of the pair was vowed by the consul Spurius Carvilius and dedicated in 293 BCE. Her festival, the Fors Fortuna of June, drew Romans of every rank down the river by boat and on foot to those gardens — a day of release and drinking on the water, a holiday of the people rather than the magistrates.

A further temple stood in the cattle market by the Tiber, the Forum Boarium, where Fortuna was paired with the dawn-goddess Mater Matuta; the twin podia of their archaic temples have come up in excavation beside the church of Sant’Omobono. (This riverside cult should not be folded into that of Vesta, whose hearth-fire and Vestals belonged to a wholly separate quarter and office.) Across these foundations Fortuna acquired the character that the Roman Republic gave her: a public goddess, woven into the calendar and the city’s sense of its own luck, and at the same time a private one, invoked at every threshold where an outcome hung in the balance — a birth, a journey, a harvest, a battle.

Praeneste and the speaking lots

Her greatest sanctuary lay not in Rome but at Praeneste, in the hills to the east, where a vast terraced complex housed an oracle. There she was Fortuna Primigenia — the firstborn — a title that fused two ideas held together at the site: she was at once the first-created among powers, the source from which the others issued, and the goddess who governed the firstborn child at the instant of its birth. Parents carried newborns to her to bind their fate to hers from the start.

The oracle worked by lot. The sortes Praenestinae were thin tablets of oak, incised with words in an archaic script and kept in a chest of olive wood; when a petitioner came, a child drew one out at random, and the answer it carried was held to be the goddess speaking. Cicero, a skeptic about such things, preserved the founding story in his treatise On Divination: a Praenestine of standing, Numerius Suffustius, was driven by repeated dreams to break open a flint rock at a marked spot; when he did, the lots sprang out, carved on oak in the old characters, and beside them honey was found welling from the stone for the infant god Jupiter who stood at Fortuna’s side. Cicero recounts it only to dismiss the whole apparatus of lot-drawing as a contrivance, maintained, he says, for profit and the encouragement of credulity — yet his very contempt is the measure of how alive the oracle still was, drawing petitioners across the Republic and beyond.

The architecture matched the ambition. In the late second century BCE the hillside of Praeneste was rebuilt as one of the boldest works of its age: a sequence of broad terraces climbing the slope on enormous concrete substructures, joined by twin ramps and grand stairs, framed by colonnades and a double hemicycle, and crowned at the summit by a round temple — a tholos — that held the goddess. Roman builders here used concrete vaulting and the barrel vault on a monumental scale, draping an entire mountainside in built space and turning the ascent to the oracle into a staged climb toward the divine. It was a structure that did in stone what the cult did in idea: it made the unbounded approachable, gave shape to the formless power one came to consult. Antium, on the coast, held a second oracle of Fortune, its lots scarcely less famous; Horace opened one of his odes by addressing the goddess who rules pleasant Antium, and Suetonius records that the emperor Caligula, warned by the Antiate lots to beware a man named Cassius, had a Cassius put to death.

The epithets and the attributes

Fortuna wore many epithets, and each named a sphere she governed: Fortuna Primigenia, the firstborn; Fortuna Muliebris, of women, whose temple recalled the matrons who turned Coriolanus back from the gates; Fortuna Virilis, invoked over a woman’s fortune in marriage; Fortuna Redux, who brought a traveler or an emperor home safe, and who under the empire became a public cult of the returning ruler; Fortuna Publica, the luck of the Roman people itself, set beside Fortuna Huiusce Diei, the Fortune of this particular day. There were darker names too — Mala Fortuna, ill luck, and Dubia, the doubtful — for a power that gave both faces. The proliferation is not muddle but the cult’s own logic: because chance touched everything, the goddess could be split into as many fortunes as there were spheres of risk, and the multiplicity of her names is the clearest sign that she meant many different things to many different worshippers.

Her common attributes carried the idea plainly. A cornucopia for the abundance she could pour out; a ship’s rudder — the gubernaculum — for her steering of events, the pilot’s hand on the course of a life; and a globe or a wheel for the instability beneath every gift. The globe says she stands on nothing fixed; the wheel says she is always in motion. Late imperial images sometimes set her rudder on a ball or showed her balanced on a sphere, and the message was the same in every case: what she rests on can roll, and so can anyone she has lifted.

Tyche, and the long convergence

The Greeks had their own such figure in Tyche, daughter of Ocean in one tradition, who rose to enormous prominence in the Hellenistic age, when cities adopted her as their guardian and crowned her with a circuit of their walls — the Tyche of Antioch, seated above the river-god of the Orontes, became the model for a thousand civic copies. Tyche too carried the rudder and the horn of plenty, and as Greek and Roman thought converged the two goddesses were freely identified, each lending the other her iconography and her reach. How far the Roman Fortuna simply absorbed the Greek one, and how far she had always carried this meaning, is a question the sources leave open; what is plain is that by the late Republic they had become a single figure spoken of in two languages.

The philosophers fought over what she was. To the Stoics, there was no Fortuna at all in the goddess’s sense: what looked like chance was only the part of the universal causal order that the human mind could not see, and the wise course was to receive whatever came as the work of providence. The argument over chance against divine providence, over luck against fate, ran straight through Roman thought and on into Christian theology, and Fortuna stood at its center as the name for everything that seemed to fall outside any plan. Cicero, who had recorded the Praenestine oracle only to disbelieve it, also wrote the dialogues in which the Roman debate over fate and foreknowledge was set down for the Latin West. She belonged, in the end, to the wider world of Roman divination and the reciprocal cult of Roman religion — a goddess one consulted by lot precisely because her gift came without reason and might be read, if at all, only in signs.

From courted power to moral emblem

Under the empire Fortuna was everywhere: on the coinage, in the household shrine, in the cult of Fortuna Augusta that bound the ruler’s luck to the state. She kept company in the syncretic religious world of the age with the gods of the incoming mysteries — with Isis, in whose hymns she was named among the goddess’s titles, and with Serapis — as the abstract power of outcome that could be slotted into almost any theology. But it was the wheel that outlived the cult. As Rome’s gods receded, the rota Fortunae survived as an image rather than an object of worship — most influentially in Boethius, the philosopher who, awaiting execution near Pavia around 524, wrote The Consolation of Philosophy. In its second book he brings Fortune on stage to speak in her own defense: she turns her wheel by right, she says, raising and lowering as she pleases, and the man who mounts it has no ground to complain when it carries him down, for inconstancy is the only thing she ever promised. Through him the wheel passed into medieval art and verse, a fixture of cathedral windows and moral poetry. The thirteenth-century Carmina Burana opens with a lament to O Fortuna, the wheel set with four kings around its rim — regnabo, regno, regnavi, sum sine regno: I shall reign, I reign, I have reigned, I am without a kingdom — and in the rose windows of the great churches the same wheel turned, with kings riding up one side and falling down the other.

In that tradition the goddess had changed in kind. What Rome had courted as a real power — with temples, with lot-oracles, with offerings against bad luck — the Middle Ages received as an image to think with: not a deity who grants or withholds, but a figure of how little of any life its owner holds.

Sources and scholarship

The standard modern account of the cult in its Roman setting is Mary Beard, John North, and Simon Price, Religions of Rome (Cambridge University Press, 1998). The fullest recent study of Fortuna as both goddess and concept is Daniele Miano, Fortuna: Deity and Concept in Archaic and Republican Italy (Oxford University Press, 2018), reviewed in the Bryn Mawr Classical Review; Miano sets aside the older effort to reduce the goddess to a single essential power and argues that contradiction and multiplicity were proper to her, the many epithets recording the many things she meant to different worshippers. The representation of fortuna across coins, cult, literature, and philosophy is the subject of Lydia Matthews, Roman Constructions of fortuna (D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 2011), available open access through the Oxford University Research Archive. The founding legend of the Praenestine lots and the skeptic’s case against divination by lot are given by Cicero in De Divinatione, Book II, whose Latin text is held in the Latin Library. For the afterlife of the wheel, the rota Fortunae of the Carmina Burana and its passage through Boethius into medieval song is traced by Medievalists.net. On the goddess’s wider place in Roman thought, see the entries on fate, divine providence, and divination.

→ Related: Vesta · Hercules · Divination · Servius Tullius · Boethius · Roman Republic · Ancient Roman Religion · Fate · Divine Providence · Stoicism · Cicero · Roman Empire · Isis · Serapis