Concept
Fate
The idea that events are fixed in advance by an order beyond human control — named by the Greeks as the Moirai, by the Stoics as heimarmene, and read off the sky by astrology.
Fate is the idea that the course of events is fixed in advance, settled by an order that human will neither sets nor escapes. The word covers several distinct pictures of that order, and much of the history of the concept is the work of telling them apart: a thing decreed, a thing spun, a thing wired into the chain of cause and effect, a thing written in the stars.
The oldest Greek image is the Moirai — three goddesses, their name meaning “portions” or “allotments.” Hesiod names all three in the Theogony: Clotho, who spins the thread of a life, Lachesis, who measures it, and Atropos, “the unturning,” who cuts it. The metaphor is domestic and absolute: a life is a length of thread, and even the gods are said, at the edges, to defer to what has been spun. Alongside them stands the older sense of moira as a person’s allotted share, the portion of life and death assigned at birth. This is fate as apportionment, not yet as a system.
Stoic philosophy turned the image into an argument. The Stoics held that the cosmos is a single rational body governed throughout by logos, and that every event follows necessarily from those before it; they called this unbroken chain heimarmene. Nothing falls outside it, including the human mind. The much- debated consequence was whether anything remained for human choice, and the Stoic answer was subtle: the wise person is not freed from fate but reconciled to it, willing what is bound to happen anyway. Epictetus puts the discipline plainly — to want events to occur as they do, rather than as one would prefer. Where Stoicism made fate something to consent to, later Platonism worked to fence it in. Plotinus, in the tractate the library holds, argues that the rule of cause and necessity governs the body and the lower soul but cannot reach the soul’s highest part, which is the seat of its freedom.
A separate strand located fate in the heavens. Hellenistic astrology, drawing on Babylonian celestial divination, taught that the configuration of stars and planets at birth inscribed a person’s destiny, which a trained reader could recover. The Greek term heimarmene was carried over to name precisely this stellar determinism, and resisting it became a recurring task: several Gnostic and Hermetic texts present knowledge of the divine as a way to slip the grip of the planetary powers and the fate they impose.
These pictures are not one doctrine, and the differences matter. Fate as a weighed-out portion, fate as an iron chain of causes, and fate as a script in the sky make different claims about what is fixed, by what, and whether anything can be done. What they share is narrow but durable: the conviction that the shape of a life is, in some real measure, not in the living of it. The opposing intuitions — chance on one side, a freely choosing will on the other — have defined themselves against fate ever since, which is part of why the idea has never quite gone away.
→ In the library: Plotinus — The Enneads (MacKenna): Third Ennead, First Tractate: Fate · Epictetus — The Discourses and Manual (Matheson, 1916)
→ Related: Logos · Neoplatonism · Divination · Oedipus · Emanation
Sources
- Bobzien 1998