Epistle to Titus

← Encyclopedia

The Epistle to Titus is a brief letter in the New Testament, presented as written by the apostle Paul to his colleague Titus, whom he has left on the island of Crete to set its young churches in order. At three chapters it is one of the shortest books in the canon, and it reads less like a meditation than like a working memorandum: appoint elders, silence troublemakers, teach the various groups in the congregation how to live. The voice is that of a senior worker dispatching a junior one with a list of tasks and a deadline — “that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting.” Almost everything in it is means to that end.

Titus, the letter’s named recipient and traditional first bishop of Crete, in a 14th-century fresco at the Patriarchate of Pec, Kosovo — Anonymous, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

A letter framed as instruction

Titus, the named recipient, is a Gentile coworker who appears across the undisputed Pauline correspondence — taken to Jerusalem as a test case for the uncircumcised believer, then sent ahead to the fractured congregation at Corinth as Paul’s trusted go-between, the man entrusted with delicate errands among difficult communities. He never speaks in the surviving record; he is always the one carried to, sent to, relied upon. The letter assumes that whole biography without narrating it, addressing him as a true child in a shared faith and handing him a province to settle. It opens with an unusually weighty salutation for so short a text — naming Paul a servant of God and apostle of Jesus Christ, and folding into the greeting a compressed statement of the promise of eternal life that God, who cannot lie, pledged before the ages — and then gets straight to the charge: Titus is to remain on Crete and ordain elders in every city, because the work of organizing the communities there is unfinished. Crete itself is sketched only by the trouble it gives — a frontier full of new believers, old loyalties, and teachers the letter does not trust.

Crete, the island where Titus is left to order the churches, in Abraham Ortelius’s map of 1584 — Abraham Ortelius, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The contents fall into a tidy administrative shape. A salutation and the commission (chapter one) give way to instruction for the household of the church (chapter two) and then to conduct in the wider world, capped by a doctrinal summary and closing errands (chapter three). It is the architecture of a manual, not a sermon: each section answers the question of how a small, exposed community is to hold itself together when the founder has moved on.

The elder, the overseer, and the deceivers

Its first concern is leadership, and here the letter is precise. An elder must be blameless — married once, with children who are themselves believers and not open to the charge of riot or insubordination. The same person, named in the next breath as overseer, must be no self-pleaser, not quick-tempered, not given to wine or violence or money, but hospitable, a lover of good, sober, just, holy, and self-controlled, holding firmly to the trustworthy word as he has been taught, so that he can both encourage with sound teaching and refute those who contradict it. The two titles — elder and overseer, presbyter and bishop in the older English — fall on the same office here; the distinction between them that the later church would make has not yet hardened. What the letter wants is not a charismatic but a steady custodian, a man whose chief qualification is that he can be trusted with a deposit.

Against that figure stands a class of opponents the letter treats with open contempt: the unruly, the empty talkers and deceivers, “specially they of the circumcision,” who upset whole households by teaching for shameful gain things they ought not. The error is sketched rather than cataloged — Jewish fables, commandments of men who turn from the truth, fruitless wrangling over words — and the prescription is blunt. Their mouths must be stopped; a man who stirs division is to be warned once, warned a second time, and after that left alone, since such a person has condemned himself. The line between teaching the community will accept and teaching it will not is being drawn in real time, and the drawing of it is half the letter’s business. This is the early machinery of heresy as a working category — not yet a formal doctrine of error, but the reflex that produces one. The remedy the letter trusts is institutional rather than argumentative: a reliable office holding a fixed body of teaching, against which the deceivers are measured and found wanting. Sound doctrine is named again and again precisely because it is the standard the new leadership exists to keep, and the disqualifying of a teacher follows almost procedurally from his failure to hold it.

The famous Cretan line

Into this warning the letter drops its most quoted sentence. “One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true.” The prophet is Epimenides of Crete, a half-legendary seer of the sixth century before the common era; the same proverbial slander surfaces in the Hellenistic poet Callimachus, whose Hymn to Zeus calls Cretans liars for claiming to display the tomb of a god Callimachus holds to be deathless. The author turns the local libel into a rhetorical weapon: even their own admit it, so deal with them sharply.

Logicians later found something the author did not intend. A Cretan asserting that all Cretans always lie says something that cannot be straightforwardly true — if it is true, its speaker is a liar and it is false. Read that way the verse became a textbook specimen of the liar paradox, the self-referential sentence that undoes itself, and acquired a second life in the history of logic far from the pastoral quarrel it was written to settle. The letter, indifferent to the puzzle, presses on to the next instruction.

The household and the wider order

Chapter two arranges the congregation by station and tells each part how to behave: aged men to be sober and sound in faith, aged women reverent and teachers of good who train the younger women to love their husbands and children, young men to be self-controlled, servants to be faithful and not answer back, so that the teaching of God may be adorned in everything. This is a version of the household code familiar from other letters of the period — the Epistle to the Ephesians and Colossians carry their own — but here it is bent toward respectability under a watching world: live in such a way that outsiders find nothing to accuse. Chapter three widens the frame still further, enjoining submission to rulers and authorities, readiness for every good work, and gentleness toward all, with a backward glance at what the believers themselves once were.

The grace that has appeared

Twice the administrative prose lifts into something else, and these are the doctrinal peaks the rest is built around. In the first, the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all, training those it teaches to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions and to live soberly and justly in the present age, while looking for the blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself to redeem a people of his own. In the second, the kindness and love of God the savior appeared and saved us, not by works of righteousness but according to his mercy, through the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Spirit, so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs in hope of eternal life.

The structure of both passages turns on a verb of appearing — in the Greek the same root that gives the word epiphany. Salvation has two manifestations: the grace that has already shown itself, and the glory still awaited. Both passages also carry a liturgical density unusual in so practical a letter; their balanced clauses and set phrases have struck many readers as borrowed or quasi-credal, compact summaries of the faith dropped in to anchor the instruction around them, and the salvation they describe is pointedly not earned — not by works of righteousness but by mercy, through a washing of regeneration, the language of cleansing and inheritance that the Greek scriptures of the older covenant had made ready. That second, forward-looking term — the glory still to appear — is the letter’s link to the wider expectation of the early movement, the same horizon of a returning Christ that animates eschatology, the kingdom of God, and the hope of a second coming across the New Testament. But the weight has shifted. The hope is named, then immediately enlisted to motivate conduct: because grace has appeared and glory is coming, behave well in the meantime. The expectation has become a discipline for the long wait rather than a countdown — a current the Pastorals share with the calmer, institution-minded letters of the period, where the fervor of the earliest correspondence has settled into a doctrine to be guarded and handed on.

The Pastoral Epistles

Together with the two letters to Timothy — First Timothy and Second Timothy — Titus forms the group known as the Pastoral Epistles, so named because they address the care and governance of congregations rather than a community’s particular disputes. The label is a relatively late one: the Halle exegete Paul Anton fixed it on all three letters in lectures of the 1720s, a generation after D. N. Berdot had applied “pastoral” to Titus alone in 1703. The eighteenth-century name has held because the three letters genuinely belong together. They share a vocabulary — sound doctrine, godliness, the trustworthy saying, the good deposit — a tone of settled instruction, and a preoccupation with orderly office and reliable teaching that sets them apart from the letters whose Pauline authorship is undisputed, such as First Corinthians or First Thessalonians, where Paul argues, pleads, and improvises under pressure. The Pastorals do not argue so much as regulate.

By the time the canon was being drawn up, all three were firmly in. They appear together in the early lists and were cited as Paul’s by the second-century fathers; their place among the Pauline letters was never seriously contested in antiquity, even where a heterodox reader rejected them — the canon-builder Marcion, in the second century, is reported to have left the Pastorals out of his pared-down collection of Paul, a fact later writers turned against him. Their standing as scripture, in other words, is old and stable; the modern debate is not about whether they belong in the Bible but about whose hand wrote them, a question the ancient church did not pose in the terms a modern critic does.

The authorship question

Those very differences are what make Titus, with its companions, among the most contested books in the canon as to authorship — and the three claim- registers here are worth keeping apart. On the documentary side, the critical case for pseudonymity rests on three observable features. First, language: the Pastorals carry a markedly higher proportion of words found nowhere else in the Pauline corpus, the statistical argument given its classic form by P. N. Harrison in The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles (1921), whose method has since been pressed and qualified by later scholars including Donald Guthrie and Bruce Metzger. Second, structure: the fixed offices the letters assume — an established eldership and oversight, a transmitted body of sound teaching to be guarded — look more developed than the fluid, gift-driven communities of the undisputed letters. Third, the picture of false teaching, with its fables and genealogies and proto-ascetic errors, reads to many as belonging to a later generation. On these grounds most critical scholarship, surveyed even-handedly by Raymond Brown in his 1997 introduction to the New Testament and argued more forcefully by Bart Ehrman in his 2013 study of early Christian forgery, holds the Pastorals to be the work of a later writer in Paul’s name, composed somewhere between the 80s and the turn of the second century.

The letter presents itself as Paul’s, though much modern scholarship doubts his hand wrote it; the apostle as imagined by Rembrandt, about 1657 — Rembrandt van Rijn, National Gallery of Art, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Against this stands the tradition-internal position, received and defended: the letters present themselves as Paul’s, and a Pauline authorship can be sustained if one supposes a mission to Crete and a release from a first Roman imprisonment for which the Acts of the Apostles leaves room but does not record, with a secretary’s hand accounting for some of the stylistic drift. Much of the church that reads Titus today holds it Paul’s own. The two positions are argued on both sides with care, and the letter itself does not settle between them.

Texts and scholarship

The Greek text of Titus is established from the standard critical editions of the New Testament, and the letter is short enough that its textual problems are few; the disputes that matter are interpretive and historical rather than text-critical. For the English reader the public-domain King James rendering preserves the proverbial force of the contested verse — “the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies” (Titus 1:12, KJV, with the cross-references to Epimenides set out at Bible Hub).

Papyrus 32, the earliest surviving copy of the text, preserving Titus 1:11-15 and dated to about AD 200; John Rylands Library, Manchester — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The naming of the three letters as the Pastoral Epistles, and the shared features that justify the grouping, are laid out in standard reference surveys (overview of the Pastorals). The modern authorship question turns on the statistical-vocabulary case first pressed by P. N. Harrison in The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles (1921) and since reweighed by later linguists; the pseudonymity position is summarized by Bart Ehrman (on the Pastorals’ authorship and date) and surveyed even-handedly in Raymond Brown’s 1997 introduction, while the traditional Pauline reconstruction and the ancient reception — including Marcion’s pointed exclusion of the three letters — are set out in scholarly introductions to the corpus (introduction to the Pastoral Epistles).

A house in order while it waits

Whatever its origin, the letter marks a movement visible across the later New Testament: from the urgency of a community expecting the end soon to the steady provisioning of one that must endure — appointing leaders, fixing the qualities they must have, drawing the line between teaching it will accept and teaching it will not, and teaching every station in the household how to live under the eyes of outsiders. The blessed hope is still named, but it now underwrites the daily discipline rather than displacing it; the immediate work is keeping a house in order while the appearing is awaited. A short administrative letter to one man on one island turns out to record the moment a movement begins building the structures it expects to occupy for a long time.

→ Related: Second Epistle To Timothy · Epistle To The Colossians · Epistle Of Jude · Eschatology · Kingdom Of God · First Epistle To Timothy · Paul The Apostle · New Testament · Christianity · Second Coming · Heresy · Epistle To The Ephesians · First Epistle To The Corinthians · First Epistle To The Thessalonians