Entity

Edmund Gurney

English psychologist and a founder of the Society for Psychical Research, principal author of the 1886 study of apparitions and telepathy, Phantasms of the Living.

← Encyclopedia

Edmund Gurney (1847–1888) was an English psychologist and one of the founders of the Society for Psychical Research, founded in London in 1882 by a largely Cambridge circle to examine reports of telepathy, apparitions, and trance under the standards of evidence then governing the natural sciences. Among the early investigators he was the one who did the heaviest experimental and documentary labor, and his death at forty-one was the first great loss the young society sustained.

Gurney came to the work by a long detour. Trained at Trinity College, Cambridge, he studied in turn music, medicine, and law, found no settled vocation in any, and was drawn into psychical research through his friendships with Frederic Myers and Henry Sidgwick — the circle that would form the society’s core. The motive was not credulity but bereavement and doubt: these were people for whom the Victorian collision between religious faith and scientific naturalism was a personal crisis, and who hoped that the question of survival after death might be settled by evidence rather than left to belief.

His major monument is Phantasms of the Living, the two-volume work of 1886 written with Myers and Frank Podmore, of which Gurney composed the larger part. It gathered and assessed hundreds of reported cases in which a person seemed to perceive a distant friend or relative at the moment of that person’s death or crisis — the “crisis apparition.” Gurney’s argument treated such experiences as possible evidence of telepathy, a term Myers had coined, and built statistical and source-critical machinery to test whether the coincidences exceeded chance. He worked in parallel on hypnotism, conducting careful experiments on suggestion and on what he read as thought-transference between operator and subject; this laboratory side of his work is now judged his most durable, anticipating later experimental psychology.

The verdict on his findings has remained divided. Contemporary critics, and many since, held that the apparition cases rested on memory and testimony too frail to bear the weight; defenders answered that the collection’s scale and the care of its sifting set a standard for the field. The hypnotism experiments, too, were later shadowed by suspicion that an assistant had deceived him.

Gurney died in a Brighton hotel in 1888, from an overdose of chloroform he is thought to have used against neuralgia and insomnia; whether the death was accident or suicide was never established, and the question has attached itself to his memory ever since. He left the society its method more than its conclusions: the conviction that claims of the extraordinary should be met neither with ridicule nor with assent, but with collection, doubt, and the patient weighing of cases.

Related: William Crookes · Franz Anton Mesmer

Sources

  • Gauld 1968