Phenomenon

Circumcision

The surgical removal of the foreskin, made in Judaism the sign of the covenant — and read, in the same scriptures and after, as a figure for an inward cutting-away.

← Encyclopedia

Circumcision is the cutting away of the foreskin of the penis, practiced across many cultures but carrying, in the Abrahamic religions, the weight of a sign: the bodily mark of belonging to a covenant. The Hebrew scriptures place its origin in a command to Abraham. In the narrative of Genesis, God establishes a covenant and requires that every male of the household be circumcised on the eighth day after birth, the flesh of the body made the standing token of an agreement said to bind the line forever. What was at stake, in the texts’ own terms, was membership — who belonged to the people and who did not.

In Judaism the rite became the brit milah, the covenant of circumcision, performed on the eighth day and treated as one of the gravest of obligations. It is the act by which a male infant is brought formally within the people of Israel; later law and custom built around it the figure of the mohel, the trained circumciser, and a liturgy of blessing. The same scriptures, however, also speak of circumcision in a register that is not surgical at all. The book of Deuteronomy charges Israel to circumcise the foreskin of the heart, and the prophet Jeremiah repeats the demand — language that takes a rite of the body and turns it inward, toward something like an unstopping of obstinacy. Whether the inward sense was meant to deepen the outward rite or to relativize it is a question the texts leave open, and one their later readers answered in opposing ways.

That ambiguity became a fault line in early Christianity. The first followers of Jesus were circumcised Jews, and the question of whether Gentile converts must be circumcised provoked one of the movement’s sharpest disputes. Paul, in letters that scholarship dates to the mid-first century, argued that they need not be: the true circumcision, he wrote, is of the heart and not the flesh, and the outward mark counts for nothing apart from it. Mainstream Christianity followed him, and circumcision ceased to be required of its adherents — though the metaphor of an inward cutting-away survived long after the practice was let go. Among Jewish interpreters of the Hellenistic world, the allegorical and the literal were held together rather than set against each other: Philo of Alexandria read the rite as a sign of the excision of the passions while insisting the physical act be kept.

In Islam circumcision (khitan) is widely practiced and held to belong to the way of Abraham, regarded as an act of cleanliness and of conformity to prophetic custom, though it is not commanded in the Qurʾān itself and its standing among the schools of law is variously argued. Across these traditions the rite keeps its double character: an irreversible mark on the body, and a sustained metaphor for what such a mark was supposed to mean. The same word names a thing done with a knife and a thing done to the will, and the distance between them is where most of the argument has lived.

Related: Shem · Gnosis