Thing

Ars Moriendi

The late-medieval "art of dying" — Christian manuals on the deathbed temptations and the good death, instructing the dying and those who attended them how to meet the final hour.

← Encyclopedia

The Ars Moriendi — Latin for “the art of dying” — is a body of late-medieval Christian devotional literature instructing the faithful, and those at their bedside, how to die well. It treated the deathbed as a decisive contest for the soul, and set out in plain steps what the dying person and their companions should do as the last hour came. Its premise was that dying is a thing done rightly or wrongly, a passage that can be prepared for and lost, and that the sickroom in the last hours is not a place of mere waiting but the ground on which a life is finally either secured or forfeited.

Engraving of a dying man in bed surrounded by demons holding scrolls of his sins, tempting him to despair. The temptation to despair: demons crowd the deathbed bearing written accusations of the dying man’s sins — one of the eleven engravings by the Master E. S., c. 1450. — Master E. S., via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

A genre born of plague and reform

The genre took shape in the early fifteenth century, in a Europe still marked by the recurring plague and by the reforming energies of the Council of Constance. The Black Death of the mid-fourteenth century and its returning waves had made sudden, unattended death an ordinary event rather than a rare calamity; whole households could be carried off before a priest arrived, and the older assurance that the parish church would always be there to see one out had been broken in practice. Into that breach came a literature that put the substance of the last rites into the hands of any literate Christian — and, through pictures, into the reach of those who could read nothing at all.

The reforming churchmen gathered at Constance between 1414 and 1418 to heal the papal schism carried with them a conviction that pastoral care had to be made portable and teachable: that the ordinary believer needed instruction not only in how to live but in how to die. The most important single source standing behind the genre is the Opus tripartitum of the Parisian chancellor and conciliar theologian Jean Gerson, written around 1403–1408, whose third treatise, De arte moriendi, distilled the deathbed counsel of the schools into a brief, usable form. Gerson was secular clergy, not a friar, and the manuals that followed are not his text; but his short tract is the wellspring from which they drew.

The two texts

Two related works did most to spread the art across Europe. The first, a longer treatise usually known by its opening words as the Tractatus artis bene moriendi — and sometimes as the Speculum artis bene moriendi, the “mirror” of the art of dying well — appeared around 1415. An anonymous author, traditionally taken to have been a Dominican working within the conciliar circle, though the ascription is not secure, laid the matter out in six parts. The treatise opens by commending death to the well-prepared Christian and arguing that death, rightly understood, is not to be feared by the faithful; it then names the temptations that assail the dying; it supplies the questions to put to a dying person to confirm their faith and repentance; it offers prayers in imitation of Christ’s own dying; it instructs the attending friends in what to do at the bed; and it gathers prayers to be said over the departing soul. The order is deliberate: doctrine, then danger, then examination, then example, then the labor of the bedside, then intercession.

The second was a shorter, illustrated version that circulated from the mid-century, drawn largely from the long treatise’s central second part — the part on the temptations. It survives in a handful of manuscripts and, more famously, in more than twenty illustrated block-book editions printed from upward of a dozen distinct sets of carved blocks, each carrying its text alongside a sequence of eleven woodcuts. The graphic series appears to descend from a set of eleven copperplate engravings by the German printmaker known only as the Master E. S., active around 1450; anonymous woodcutters copied his designs for the block-book editions that carried the images into far wider circulation.

Engraving of a dying man in bed beset by demons holding up idols, with figures of faith at the foot of the bed. The temptation against faith: demons hold up false images to unsettle the dying mind — the opening scene of the Master E. S. engraved series that the block-book woodcutters copied. — Master E. S., via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Printing multiplied both texts. The work was Englished by William Caxton and by Wynkyn de Worde before the close of the fifteenth century, translated across the European vernaculars, and remained in wide use into the sixteenth.

The five temptations and their consolations

At the heart of the illustrated version stand five temptations said to assail the dying, each shown as demons crowding the bed, and each answered by an opposing consolation brought by angels. The first ten woodcuts run in five paired scenes — a temptation, then its remedy — and an eleventh closes the sequence.

Against loss of faith, with the demons holding up idols and false doctrines to unsettle the dying mind, the manuals set the affirmation of belief: the angel recalls the articles of the creed and the company of the faithful dead. Against despair over the weight of one’s sins, the demons unrolling written accusations of a misspent life, they set the assurance of mercy, grounded in the Passion of Christ and the example of the penitent thief, of Peter, of Mary Magdalene — those who sinned greatly and were received.

Engraving of the dying man consoled by angels and saints, with the penitent thief shown crucified beside the bed and the demons turned away. The consolation against despair: angels recall the mercy of the Passion, the penitent thief shown crucified beside the bed. — Master E. S., via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Against impatience under the pains of dying, the temptation to rage against suffering or to wish it over by any means, they set the example of patient endurance, the dying conformed to the patience of the crucified. Against the subtler temptation of spiritual pride — the snare reserved for the seemingly devout, in which the demons flatter the dying with their own holiness — they set humility and the recollection of one’s faults. And against attachment to goods, to family, and to life itself, the last and in some ways the most human pull, they set a final letting-go, the surrender of all earthly holding into the hands of God.

The eleventh and final woodcut shows the outcome the whole sequence works toward: the dying man’s soul, drawn as a small naked figure issuing from his mouth, gathered up by angels while the defeated demons retreat in confusion. Around the bed the intercessors cluster — the Virgin, Peter and Paul, the Magdalene, the Good Thief — beneath the figure of the crucified Christ. The pictures made the teaching legible to those who could not read the Latin, and gave the genre its lasting visual signature: the deathbed as a battlefield in miniature, demons and angels contending over the small naked soul at the center.

Engraving of the dying man's death: angels receive his soul as a small naked figure from his mouth while demons retreat, the crucified Christ above and saints around the bed. The eleventh and final scene: angels gather up the soul, shown as a small naked figure leaving the mouth, as the defeated demons retreat beneath the crucified Christ. — Master E. S., via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The theology of the deathbed

The tradition held the moment of death to be the point at which a life was gathered up and judged, and so the time of greatest danger and greatest opportunity alike. On this understanding the deathbed was not the end of the moral drama but its climax — the hour in which the whole shape of a life came due, and in which a long fidelity could still be lost or a long failure still be redeemed. Two convictions met here. The first was that the eternal lot of the soul hung on the disposition in which a person died, so that the demons pressed hardest at the very threshold, hoping to undo at the last what a life of grace had built. The second was that the mercy held out in the Passion reached even to that final instant, so that the same threshold was the place where the contrite thief was promised paradise.

To die well, on this understanding, was not a matter of the final minutes only but the fruit of a whole life rightly ordered toward it; the manuals nonetheless concentrated their attention on the bedside, where the contest was thought to be joined in earnest. The genre stood within a wider economy of the Christian death: the priest’s coming with confession, the anointing of the dying later codified as extreme unction, the Eucharist given as food for the journey, and afterward the suffrages of the living — the Masses offered for the dead that, in the medieval reckoning, eased the soul’s passage through purgatory toward heaven and away from hell. The Ars Moriendi did not replace these; it supplied what to do when the priest was late or could not come, and it taught the dying person and the bystanders to carry the burden of the threshold themselves.

The work of the attending friends was real labor. The manuals taught them to keep the dying person’s mind fixed on Christ, to put the searching questions of faith and repentance, to prompt the prayers when the dying could no longer frame them, to hold a crucifix and an image before the failing eyes, and above all to ward off the despair the demons were imagined to press. The bedside companion was not a spectator but a combatant in the soul’s defense — a layman made, for an hour, the soul’s advocate.

Sources, scholarship, and the printed life of the art

The Ars Moriendi sits within the late-medieval preoccupation with death that also produced the danse macabre, the cadaver tomb, the sermons on the Four Last Things, and the broad culture of memento mori — the reminder, in image and motto, that death is certain and its hour unknown. It belongs as well to the spirituality of the Devotio Moderna and its great monument, the Imitation of Christ associated with Thomas à Kempis, with their shared insistence that the inner ordering of the soul, not learned subtlety, is what bears fruit at the end. The schoolmen of high scholasticism had built the doctrinal frame the manuals presuppose; the conciliar reformers, and a generation later figures such as Nicholas of Cusa, carried into the fifteenth century the conviction that this doctrine had to be made pastorally usable at every level of the Church.

The genre’s documentary trail is well studied. The standard account of its development remains Mary Catharine O’Connor’s The Art of Dying Well: The Development of the Ars Moriendi (Columbia University Press, 1942), which established the relation of the long Tractatus to the short illustrated version. For the English afterlife of the tradition, Nancy Lee Beaty’s The Craft of Dying: A Study in the Literary Tradition of the Ars Moriendi in England (Yale University Press, 1970) traces the line from the medieval manuals through the humanist and the Reformation recastings to its literary high point in Jeremy Taylor; the critical texts are gathered in David W. Atkinson’s The English Ars Moriendi (Peter Lang, 1992). Frances M. M. Comper’s The Book of the Craft of Dying (1917) prints the early English tracts but is a devotional rather than a critical edition. The early printed witnesses can be examined directly: the Wellcome Collection holds a facsimile of the editio princeps block-book of about 1450, reproducing the copy then in the British Museum, and the Morgan Library preserves a block-book among its incunables. The eleven engravings of the Master E. S. that stand at the head of the pictorial tradition survive in print-room collections.

The art after the Reformation

The genre’s forward life carried it across the confessional divide that opened in the sixteenth century. Erasmus gave the art a humanist and scriptural cast in his De praeparatione ad mortem (Basel, 1534), which shifted the weight away from the deathbed crisis and toward a life of preparation, and which held that the dying who cannot reach a priest may confess directly to God and be saved where faith and a willing heart are present — a position that moved the center of gravity from the sacrament to the soul’s own disposition. That move was congenial to the Reformation. Martin Luther had already, in his early Sermon on Preparing to Die (1519), recast the deathbed struggle in terms of trust in the promises of Christ rather than the satisfactions of the dying penitent; the Protestant art of dying that followed kept the genre’s architecture of temptation and consolation while emptying it of purgatory and the intercession of the saints. In England the tradition ran through Thomas Becon’s The Sick Man’s Salve and reached its literary summit in Jeremy Taylor’s The Rule and Exercises of Holy Dying (1651), the Anglican companion to his Holy Living. The Catholic line continued in turn, notably in Robert Bellarmine’s De arte bene moriendi (1620), which gave most of its space to the long preparation of a whole life rather than to the last hours.

The Ars Moriendi belongs to a wide human family of texts that script the passage out of life — a family that includes, on the far side of cultural distance, the Egyptian funerary spells gathered under the modern title of the Book of the Dead, and the Tibetan recitation read at the bedside to guide the consciousness through the intermediate state. The structural likeness is real: each names the dangers of the threshold, supplies the words to meet them, and presupposes the living attending the dying with speech. The doctrines that fill those structures are not the same — a checklist of demons and the mercy of the cross is not a weighing of the heart against the feather of truth, nor a recognition of the clear light — and the comparison illuminates the architecture without flattening the contents.

What the manuals taught, in the end, was a discipline of attention aimed at a single point. The whole apparatus — the six parts, the paired pictures, the questions and prayers, the friends ranged against the demons — converges on the instant when the soul leaves the body, and it understands that instant as a verdict. In the logic of the genre the dying person is a soldier in the last engagement of a long campaign, and the deathbed is the field where the war for the soul is either won or lost; the Ars Moriendi is the field manual handed to the dying and to those who would not let them face the enemy alone.

→ Related: Middle Ages · The Reformation · Martin Luther · Erasmus · Thomas A Kempis · Christianity · Purgatory · Hell · Sin · Demon · Angel · Anointing Of The Sick · Mass For The Dead · Nicholas Of Cusa · Scholasticism · Book Of The Dead · Soul

Sources