Philosophy

Catharism

The name given to a dualist Christian movement in the medieval West, holding the visible world the work of an evil power — and the chief heresy of the Albigensian Crusade.

← Encyclopedia

Catharism is the name given to a dualist current within medieval Christianity, attested above all in the Languedoc of southern France and in northern Italy from the mid-twelfth century onward, and remembered now chiefly as the heresy the Albigensian Crusade was launched to destroy. The label comes from outside — cathari, “the pure ones,” a term used by the churchmen who condemned them. What those so labeled called themselves, and whether they recognised any single name at all, is among the questions that have unsettled the modern study of them.

The doctrine the sources describe is a stark dualism. There are two principles, not one: a good God of spirit and light, and an evil power responsible for the material world. The human predicament, on this account, is that of a soul fallen or kidnapped into flesh — a fragment of the good creation imprisoned in the bad. Salvation lay in escaping the cycle of bodily life rather than in redeeming it. From this followed the asceticism the inquisitors recorded: a refusal of meat and of procreation as entanglements with matter, and a sharp line between the perfecti, the few who had taken on the full discipline, and the credentes, ordinary believers who lived in the world and received the single decisive rite, the consolamentum, near death. Where this teaching came from is contested; many scholars trace a transmission from the Bogomils of the Balkans, themselves heirs to older dualist strands.

The crusade against it was the first the papacy turned upon Christians within Latin Europe. Proclaimed in 1209 after the murder of a papal legate, it ran for two decades through the towns of the south, folded the region into the French crown, and left the machinery of the medieval Inquisition behind it to finish the work by interrogation. Almost everything known of Cathar belief survives through that machinery — in the records of those who prosecuted it.

That fact has become the heart of a scholarly quarrel. The older account treated Catharism as a real counter-church, organised, with bishops and a liturgy of its own. A revisionist reading, pressed in recent decades, argues that much of this coherence was manufactured by the inquisitors themselves — that learned clergy, schooled in the ancient heresies, read an imported system onto scattered and various local dissent, and that “the Cathars” as a single institution may owe more to their accusers than to anything that existed on the ground. The debate is unresolved; the texts that might settle it are the very texts whose reliability is in question. What is not in doubt is that people in the Languedoc were burned for what they were said to hold, and that the holding of it, whatever its true shape, was taken seriously enough to be worth a war.

Related: Augustine Of Hippo · Bernard Of Clairvaux · Gnosis · Middle Ages

Sources

  • Lambert 1998
  • Moore 2012
  • Pegg 2008