Camisards

← Encyclopedia

The Camisards were Protestant insurgents of the Cévennes, the rugged uplands of Languedoc in southern France, who took up arms against the crown in the first years of the eighteenth century. What set them apart from ordinary rebels was the form their religion took: their war was led, in large part, by prophecy — men, women, and children who fell into trance and spoke with the voice of the Holy Spirit.

Jean Cavalier, the baker’s boy who became the Camisards’ chief commander, depicted at the head of his band — painting by Pierre-Antoine Labouchère, 1864, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

The revolt grew directly out of persecution. In 1685 Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes, the law promulgated by Henri IV in 1598 that had granted French Protestants a measure of toleration, and outlawed their worship outright. The crown had been narrowing that toleration for years; the revocation closed it. Pastors were given a fortnight to leave the kingdom or convert; those who stayed to preach risked the galleys or the scaffold. Temples were pulled down stone by stone, children were ordered baptized and schooled as Catholics, and the dragonnades — soldiers billeted in Protestant homes with license to coerce — broke the open church across the south. Emigration was forbidden on pain of the galleys for men and imprisonment for women, yet perhaps two hundred thousand of the Reformed slipped across the frontiers to the Dutch Republic, England, Brandenburg, and Switzerland, the great Huguenot dispersion. Those who remained and refused the Mass were the Nouveaux Convertis, “new converts” only on paper. In the isolated Cévennes the suppressed church did not die but mutated underground into the Church of the Desert — clandestine assemblies held by night in ravines and chestnut woods, kept by laypeople after the ministers were gone.

The prophets

With its pastors exiled or dead, the underground church generated its own authority from below, and it did so in an idiom that startled every witness who recorded it. From the late 1680s, and intensifying around 1700, a wave of inspiration spread through the high country. The carriers were often the least likely: a tailoring spinster from the Dauphiné borderlands is remembered as having carried the gift into the Cévennes near the turn of the century, breathing it into the young. Children of three and five, adolescents who could neither read nor write, fell to the ground in convulsions, their bodies shaking, breath catching in inarticulate cries — and then spoke. What they spoke was the decisive sign. Their mother tongue was Occitan, the langue d’oc of the mountains; but in trance they prophesied in French, the language of the Geneva Bible and of the banished pulpit, reciting Scripture they had never been taught and pronouncing deliverance, judgment, and the fall of Babylon. When they returned to themselves they remembered little or nothing of what had passed through them.

To the inspired and to those around them, the meaning was plain. The Spirit poured out on a stripped and persecuted remnant was restoring the gifts of the apostolic church — tongues and prophecy returned to a people whose ordained ministers had been taken from them. The phenomenon obeyed a recognizable grammar of charismatic prophecy: the Holy Spirit speaking through chosen vessels, the human faculties suspended, authority resting not on office or learning but on the manifest descent of the Word. The content of what the prophets spoke was as much eschatology as comfort — the coming deliverance of the faithful, the fall of Babylon understood as Rome and the persecuting crown, the imminence of judgment — and it carried, alongside the ascetic rigor of a hunted church holding its fasts and night-vigils, the certainty that the present suffering was the last trial before vindication. The phenomenon bore the structural marks of earlier ecstatic Christian currents — the second-century Montanist “New Prophecy” of Phrygia is the recurring patristic comparison — without any traceable line of descent from them. The voice came, as the Cévenols understood it, directly.

The war

Open rebellion broke out on 24 July 1702 at Pont-de-Montvert, when a band of the inspired killed the Abbé du Chayla, the archpriest charged with rooting out Protestant worship, who had been holding captured fugitives in his house. The killing released a rising that the crown could not quickly contain. For roughly two years bands of guerrillas — perhaps never more than a few thousand fighters at any moment, drawn from peasants, wool-carders, bakers, and shepherds — held the mountains against far larger royal armies. Their commanders were as unschooled as their prophets: Jean Cavalier, a baker’s boy not yet twenty who proved a natural tactician; Roland Laporte, called simply Rolland; Abraham Mazel, who had been among the band at Pont-de-Montvert; and others who led by reputation for inspiration as much as for arms. Many went into battle singing psalms in French, and several of the chiefs were themselves prophets, taking direction in trance.

The crown answered with overwhelming force — two field-marshals in succession and on the order of twenty-five thousand troops, a strikingly large commitment for a peasant insurgency, drawn off at the height of the War of the Spanish Succession. Unable to bring the elusive bands to a decisive battle, the Maréchal de Montrevel turned to the country itself: in the autumn of 1703 royal detachments carried out les brûlements, the systematic burning of the high Cévennes, destroying on the order of four hundred and sixty-six villages and hamlets and driving out their inhabitants to deny the rebels shelter and supply. The scorched-earth policy broke the population without breaking the bands. Montrevel was replaced in 1704 by the abler Maréchal de Villars, who combined pressure with an offer of partial amnesty. In May 1704 Jean Cavalier, his men exhausted and a powder cache lost, negotiated terms with Villars and laid down his arms; he was permitted to leave France and ended his improbable life as a British soldier and governor of Jersey. Roland Laporte refused to submit and was betrayed and shot on 14 August 1704; his death broke the back of the organized resistance. Scattered fighting flared for years afterward — Mazel and others kept embers alive into the end of the decade — but the war as a war was over. The dead, on every side, are usually estimated in the thousands.

The death of Roland Laporte (“Rolland”), shot on 14 August 1704 after being betrayed — illustration by Alphonse de Neuville (1835-1885), via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

The name and the three readings

The name itself is uncertain in origin. It is most often traced to the camisa, the coarse linen shirt or smock the fighters were said to wear in place of any uniform; some derive it instead from the camisade, the shirt-clad night attack that was a feature of their tactics, and a minority from the Occitan for the mountain paths they knew and the regulars did not. The fighters did not coin it for themselves.

The prophecy is what later observers found hardest to place, and it has carried three readings that need not be flattened into one. The Camisards themselves understood it within the frame already given: the plain action of the Spirit, restoring to a faithful remnant the apostolic gifts, a sign that God had not abandoned the persecuted church. Their enemies — Catholic and, very often, Protestant — called it delusion, hysteria, or fraud; the orthodox Reformed authorities in the refuge abroad, heirs of John Calvin and committed to a Reformed Christianity that had grown wary of private inspiration, were frequently as alarmed by the ecstatic style as any Catholic, fearing a return of the enthusiasm Calvin’s heirs had labored to discipline. Modern social historians have read the phenomenon as the response of a community stripped of its clergy and its institutions and generating authority from below in the only idiom left to it — a reading on which Hillel Schwartz’s The French Prophets (1980) is the standing scholarly anchor. These three accounts diverge in what they take the trance to be; they converge on one observable fact, which is the fact the whole episode turns on: ordinary people who held no office, and many who could not read, found themselves speaking with the weight of revelation, and were heard.

That convergence is what makes the Camisards an awkward neighbor to the quieter Protestant currents of their own moment. Their insurrection ran exactly counter to the inwardness of contemporary Quietism — the abandonment, passive prayer, and indifference to outward event taught by Madame Guyon, whose own clashes with Bossuet over “pure love” filled the same French decade — and at a slant to the German renewal that Philipp Jakob Spener and the early Pietists were urging within the settled churches. The persecuted south of Blaise Pascal’s country produced not interior tranquility but armed psalm-singing and prophesying children. Where the Quietist sought God by stilling the self, the Camisard prophet was seized and emptied that the Spirit might speak through the wreck of the self — two opposite routes out of the same crisis of the suppressed inner life.

The French Prophets in London

After the defeat, a handful of Camisard prophets carried the inspiration abroad. Three reached London in 1706 — Élie Marion, a one-time law clerk from near Toulouse and the most forceful of them; Durand Fage; and a Jean Cavalier of Sauve, not to be confused with the surrendered general — and around them gathered the circle the city called the “French Prophets.” Their ecstatic worship, convulsions, and prophecies of imminent judgment drew crowds and converts, including the divine John Lacy, the baronet Sir Richard Bulkeley, and the mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, who set Marion’s warnings into print; they made common cause for a time with the Philadelphian millenarians around the memory of Jane Lead. They also drew scandal and ridicule. The catastrophe came in 1708, when Lacy and others prophesied that a deceased convert, Dr. Thomas Emes, would rise from his grave in Bunhill Fields on 25 May. Vast crowds gathered to watch, troops were posted against disorder, and the dead man stayed in the ground. The failed resurrection broke the movement’s credit in London; several prophets were pilloried, and the circle scattered and dwindled.

Yet the style did not vanish. It fed into the broader history of enthusiastic and revivalist religion in the eighteenth-century English-speaking world, the world into which John Wesley would soon preach, and where the boundary between authentic inspiration and dangerous excess was endlessly contested. The bodily phenomena that scandalized London — the shaking, the shouting, the dancing, the speech in unknown tongues — resemble those that the Quakers had been known for in their first generation, the trembling that gave the Religious Society of Friends its nickname, though the Friends of the eighteenth century had largely composed themselves into silence and would not have welcomed the comparison. Some scholars trace a further, more striking line. The small Manchester society of James and Jane Wardley, the “Shaking Quakers,” is reported to have been shaped in part by the example of the French Prophets and to have taken up their shaking, dancing, and singing in tongues; from that society emerged Ann Lee, the future Mother Lee of the Shakers. Schwartz’s 1980 study set this descent on its modern footing. The thread is suggestive rather than direct — historians differ over how much weight it will bear, and the intervening generations blur it — but if it holds, a mountain rebellion in Languedoc lent something of its fire, across the Channel and then the Atlantic, to one of the most distinctive religious communities of the New World.

The record and its scholarship

The Camisards are exceptionally well documented for a peasant rising, because so much of the testimony was generated by the participants and the refuge that received them. Élie Marion and his circle put their prophecies into print in London; the surrendered general Jean Cavalier published self-justifying Memoirs of the Wars of the Cévennes (London, 1726); and pastors of the later Church of the Desert preserved the memory in exile. Against this stands a thick royal and Catholic archive of the suppression. The standard modern history of the London afterlife is Hillel Schwartz, The French Prophets: The History of a Millenarian Group in Eighteenth-Century England (University of California Press, 1980), which grew from his 1974 Yale dissertation and set the discussion of the Wardley-to-Shaker descent on its current footing. The fullest contemporary English narrative of the rising and its prophets is the Victorian antiquarian Sabine Baring-Gould’s account of the Camisards, written from within the Cévennes he knew firsthand; a concise modern synthesis of the military course of the war, the brûlements, and the negotiated end is given in the World History Encyclopedia’s treatment. French Protestant scholarship — gathered at the Musée du Désert at Mialet, in the heart of the old insurgent country — has long held the primary memory; the movement’s place in the wider Huguenot story is set out concisely in the Encyclopædia Britannica’s entry. Across this literature three claim-registers must be kept apart: the documented record of dates, commanders, and casualties; the contested questions of the name’s etymology and the real weight of the line toward the Shakers; and the prophets’ own understanding of what spoke through them, which their writings report as the unmediated descent of the Spirit.

What remains constant from the chestnut ravines of the Cévennes to the burying ground at Bunhill Fields is the configuration that defined the Camisards from the first assembly: a church without its clergy, a people forbidden their pastors, finding the lost office restored not in any ordained man but in the broken speech of a shaking child who prophesied in a tongue not her own. They held that the Spirit had not gone silent with the apostles, and that when every authorized voice was taken away, an unauthorized one would be given — and on that conviction the unlettered of Languedoc spoke, and fought, and were believed.

→ Related: Philipp Jakob Spener · Pietism · Quietism · Jeanne Marie Bouvier De La Motte Guyon · Quakers · Quakerism Religious Society Of Friends · John Wesley · Prophecy · Holy Spirit · Eschatology · Blaise Pascal · Reformed Christianity · John Calvin · Asceticism