Breslov Hasidism

← Encyclopedia

Breslov Hasidism is the Hasidic movement that formed around Rebbe Nachman of Breslov (1772–1810), a great-grandson of the Baal Shem Tov, the founder of Hasidism. It took shape in late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century Ukraine and Podolia, in the same Eastern European world that produced the other Hasidic courts, but it diverged from them on one decisive point and has carried that difference ever since.

Nachman left a teaching dense with paradox and self-examination. Its most characteristic practice is hitbodedut — literally “self-seclusion” — in which the worshipper withdraws alone, ideally outdoors at night, and speaks to God in ordinary, unscripted language, as one would to a friend. The recommendation that this be done in one’s own tongue, and daily, set Breslov apart from the more formal liturgical emphasis of other courts. Alongside the practice stands a cycle of long symbolic tales, the Sippurei Ma’asiyot, narratives of lost princesses, beggars, and exiled kings that Nachman told in his last years and that his followers read as veiled accounts of the soul and of cosmic repair. His discourses were gathered by his foremost disciple, Nathan of Nemirov, in the collection known as Likutei Moharan, the movement’s central text.

What most distinguishes Breslov is structural. When Nachman died of tuberculosis at thirty-eight, he appointed no successor, and his followers appointed none after him. Where every other Hasidic dynasty passed leadership from rebbe to rebbe, Breslov has had only one rebbe, and he died in 1810. For this the movement’s adherents were long mocked by other Hasidim as the toyte Hasidim, the “dead Hasidim.” Breslov turns the charge into doctrine: the followers hold that Nachman remains their living rebbe, that his presence and his teaching endure, and that no replacement is wanted or possible. The annual pilgrimage to his grave at Uman, in Ukraine, where many thousands gather each Rosh Hashanah, is the most visible expression of that conviction.

The movement remained small and often persecuted through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, kept alive in Ukraine and later in Jerusalem by a chain of teachers and copyists. Its wider modern visibility owes much to twentieth-century dissemination of Nachman’s writings, including English renderings that carried hitbodedut and the tales to readers far outside the traditional Hasidic world. Scholarship has read Nachman variously — as a profoundly original religious psychologist, as an heir to Lurianic Kabbalah’s drama of breakage and restoration, and as a figure whose recorded doubts and despair sit uneasily beside his calls to joy. The teaching holds those tensions without resolving them, which may be why it has outlasted courts many times its size.

→ Related: Aryeh Kaplan