Book of Jonah

← Encyclopedia

Set among the twelve Minor Prophets of the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Jonah does the one thing the books around it do not: it tells a story. Where its neighbors gather the oracles of a named seer — visions, woes, calls to return — these four short chapters narrate the doings of a prophet in the third person and put barely a single oracle in his mouth. The lone prophecy the book records is five words of Hebrew, a sentence of warning so terse it can be spoken in passing. Everything else is plot: a flight, a sea, a fish, a city spared, and a quarrel with God that the prophet loses and will not concede. The subject is not a body of teaching but a man’s revolt against the One who sent him, and against the mercy that sending was meant to carry.

Pieter Lastman, “Jonah and the Whale” (1621), oil on panel, Museum Kunstpalast, Düsseldorf — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The flight and the sea

The word comes to Jonah son of Amittai: rise, go to Nineveh, the great city, capital of Assyria, and cry out against it. Jonah rises — and goes the other way. He travels down to the port of Joppa, finds a ship bound for Tarshish at the far western edge of the known world, pays the fare, and goes aboard to flee, in the book’s recurring phrase, from the presence of the LORD. The verb that governs the opening is descent: Jonah goes down to Joppa, down into the hold, down into sleep, and the sea will take him down further still. A prophet’s commission runs east toward the inland empire; he buys passage as far west as a hull will carry him.

A great wind falls on the sea and the ship threatens to break up. The sailors — foreigners, each crying to his own god — lighten the cargo and find Jonah asleep below. They wake him, cast lots to learn whose fault the storm is, and the lot falls on him. He tells them he is a Hebrew who fears the God of heaven who made the sea and the dry land, the same sea now trying to drown them, and that the only remedy is to throw him overboard. They will not do it; they row harder; the sea grows wilder; and at last, praying that no innocent blood be charged to them, they lift him over the side. The water goes still at once. The pagan crew, who began the chapter each praying to a different deity, end it offering sacrifice and vows to the God of Israel — the first of the book’s outsiders to be moved where the prophet is not.

Jonah cast overboard to the sea-monster, fresco in the Catacombs of Saints Marcellinus and Peter, Rome, 3rd–4th century — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Three days in the fish

Then comes the image that has swallowed the book. The LORD appoints a great fish to swallow Jonah, and he is in its belly three days and three nights. The Hebrew is exact and worth holding to: dag gadol, a great fish, not a whale — the whale of later memory enters through the Greek ketos and the popular eye, not the text. From inside the creature Jonah prays, and the prayer is a fully formed psalm of thanksgiving, woven from the diction of the Psalter — the belly of Sheol, the roots of the mountains, the waters closing over the head, the pit from which the LORD brings up a life. Its placement has long divided readers: it gives thanks for a rescue that has not yet happened, since the fish does not release him until after he prays, and its polished psalmic style sits oddly against the plain narrative around it. Much historical-critical scholarship has treated the psalm as a later insertion into an otherwise continuous tale; more recent literary readers defend it as deliberate and ironic — the too-pious prayer of an unreformed prophet, all the right words from a man who has learned nothing. Either way, at the prayer’s end the LORD speaks to the fish, and it vomits Jonah onto dry land.

Jonah and the great fish, fresco in the Catacomb of Priscilla, Rome — the prophet’s descent and return became a frequent emblem in early Christian art — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The city that turned

The word comes a second time, in nearly the same form, and this time Jonah goes. He walks into Nineveh — a city so vast it takes three days to cross — and delivers his five-word oracle: in forty days, Nineveh is overthrown. He offers no terms, no path of return, no hint that anything can be done. And the city does everything. Word reaches the king, who rises from his throne, sets aside his robe, sits in ashes, and decrees a fast — for the people and, in a stroke of comedy that is also dead serious, for the animals, the beasts of Nineveh draped in sackcloth and crying out to God. They turn from their violence on the chance, the king says, that God may turn from his anger. And God does. He sees their deeds — that they had turned from their evil way — and relents from the disaster he had threatened. The Hebrew uses the same verb, nacham, for God’s change of heart that the prophets elsewhere use for human repentance: the city repents, and so, in its way, does God.

This is the hinge the whole book turns on, and the prophet hates it. Jonah, who should be vindicated — his word fulfilled in the city’s terror, his God glorified in its rescue — is instead consumed with anger. He prays again, and this prayer gives the game away. He fled to Tarshish, he says, precisely because he knew what kind of God he served: gracious and merciful, slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love, and relenting from punishment — the ancient creed of divine character that Israel elsewhere recites as comfort, Jonah recites as grievance. He had rather die than watch it extended to Nineveh. He stalks out of the city, builds a shelter on the east side, and sits down to see whether the destruction might still come.

The plant, the worm, and the question

The closing scene is a small, exact parable enacted on the prophet’s own body, and it is built on a single repeated verb. Four times in the book God appoints — manah — a creature to do his will: the great fish that swallows Jonah, and now a plant, a worm, and a wind. God appoints a leafy plant — the Hebrew qiqayon — to spring up over Jonah and shade his head, and Jonah is overjoyed by it. At dawn God appoints a worm to strike the plant so that it withers, and then a scorching east wind, until the sun beats on Jonah’s head and he begs again to die. God asks whether he does well to be angry over the plant. Jonah says he does, angry enough to die. And the LORD draws the lesson: Jonah pitied a plant he did not grow and did not tend, that came in a night and perished in a night — and should God not pity Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand persons who cannot tell their right hand from their left, and also much cattle? The book breaks off there, on God’s question, with the prophet given no answer to make.

That qiqayon would later spark one of the most famous quarrels in the history of translation. The Greek Septuagint had rendered it kolokyntha, a gourd, and the Old Latin and centuries of liturgy followed; when Jerome, translating afresh from the Hebrew for the Vulgate, put it as hedera, ivy, the change was felt as sacrilege. Augustine of Hippo reported, in a letter to Jerome, that in the North African town of Oea a congregation, hearing the unfamiliar word read aloud, broke into uproar and nearly drove out their bishop, who had to send for the local Jews to settle the sense — a measure of how deep a single plant’s name had grown into the body of the text. The plant is now usually identified with the fast-growing castor-oil shrub.

Setting and date

Jonah son of Amittai is named exactly once elsewhere in scripture, as a prophet active in the northern kingdom under Jeroboam II in the eighth century BCE, who foretold the recovery of Israel’s borders (2 Kings 14:25). That notice supplies the book its nominal setting, in the heyday of an Assyria that would, within a generation or two of that king, destroy the northern kingdom outright — which makes Nineveh, in the story’s frame, the enemy’s capital, the city whose sparing an Israelite audience would feel as a wound. Most scholarship, however, reads the book itself as a far later composition, commonly placed in the Persian period after the Babylonian exile: its Hebrew is late and salted with Aramaic, it recalls Nineveh as a vanished marvel of the past rather than a living threat, and its shape is that of a didactic tale — many would say a satire — built around an argument rather than a chronicle. The argument is about the breadth of divine compassion: whether the God of Israel may extend mercy past Israel’s borders to a foreign, hostile city, and whether a prophet has any standing to resent it. The book stands among such neighbors as the Book of Nahum, which sings the fall of that same Nineveh as deserved judgment, and the Book of Micah and Book of Hosea of the eighth-century north — its quarrel with mercy reads sharper for the company. (Compare the Book of Joel, where the same divine attribute — gracious, merciful, slow to anger — is invoked, but as the very ground of hope rather than the prophet’s complaint.)

Reading and research

The Book of Jonah has drawn an unusually large body of close study for so small a text, much of it turning on genre, on the date, and on the ethics of the ending. Jack Sasson’s commentary in the Anchor Bible series, Jonah (1990), remains the standard philological treatment, cautious on the satire question and rich on the Hebrew. Phyllis Trible made the book the laboratory for a method in Rhetorical Criticism: Context, Method, and the Book of Jonah (1994), reading its structure and repetitions for their argument. Uriel Simon’s volume in the JPS Bible Commentary series (1999) draws the long tradition of Jewish exegesis around the text, and Thomas Bolin’s Freedom beyond Forgiveness (1997) presses the unsettling case that the book defends not God’s forgiveness but God’s unconstrained freedom. A recent survey of the field by Aron Tillema, The Book of Jonah in Recent Research (2023), maps the current debates over Persian-period dating, the genre of parody, and the theology of mercy. The book’s place within the larger collection of the Twelve, and within the Tanakh as it took shape in Second Temple Judaism, keeps it bound to the wider question of what a prophecy is for when its threat is meant to fail.

Reception in three traditions

In Judaism the book is read in its entirety as the afternoon — Minḥah — reading on the Day of Atonement, the year’s great occasion of repentance, where Nineveh’s turning serves as the paradigm case. The Mishnah’s tractate on fasts draws the point narrowly: of the Ninevites it is written not that God saw their sackcloth and their fasting but that God saw their deeds, that they turned from their evil way — works, not the show of contrition, are what is seen, the same insistence the Book of Joel puts as rending the heart and not the garments.

Christian tradition fastened on the three days in the fish. The Gospels place in the mouth of Jesus the sign of Jonah: as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so the Son of Man would lie in the heart of the earth — the prophet’s descent and return read as a figure of burial and resurrection, and the image of Jonah cast up by the sea-creature became a stock emblem of rising from death in the earliest Christian art. A second strand runs alongside it: the men of Nineveh who repented at Jonah’s preaching are summoned as witnesses against an unrepentant generation that has refused a greater messenger than he.

In the Qur’an the prophet appears as Yunus ibn Matta, and a chapter — Surah Yunus — bears his name. He is also called Dhū al-Nūn, the one of the fish, and the companion of the fish: having departed in anger and been swallowed, he calls out from the layered darkness that there is no god but God, glory be to God, and that he was among the wrongdoers, and on that confession he is delivered onto an open shore and sheltered, as in the Hebrew book, by a spreading plant. His people are remembered as a community whose collective turning toward God averted the punishment hanging over them — the same mercy that, in the book that opens his story, the prophet could not forgive.

“Jonah and the Whale,” folio from a Jami al-Tavarikh (Compendium of Chronicles), Iran, ca. 1400 — the released prophet sheltered by the gourd vine, with an angel offering a garment — Metropolitan Museum of Art, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The great fish has fixed Jonah in the popular eye and very nearly crowded out what the book is built to do. The marvel of the rescue is the smaller wonder; the larger one is a city’s reprieve and a prophet’s rage at it. By the last verse the creature is far behind, and the contest it once seemed to be about — survival, the spectacle of a man delivered from the sea — has given way to the only contest the book cares about: a prophet who wants Nineveh destroyed and a God who counts its hundred and twenty thousand bewildered souls, and even its cattle, worth the sparing. God speaks last, and what he speaks is mercy made into an argument; Jonah, who has spent four chapters running from exactly that mercy, has nothing left to say to it, and is given nothing more to do but sit in the wind he was sent to spare a city from.

→ Related: Book Of Hosea · Book Of Nahum · Book Of Micah · Book Of Joel · Lamentations · Mesopotamia · Assyria · Tanakh · Second Temple Judaism · Prophecy · Jesus Christ · Qur An