Best of All Possible Worlds

← Encyclopedia

The doctrine of the best of all possible worlds is the argument, advanced by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, that the world as it exists is the finest one a perfect God could have made. Among the infinitely many worlds God could conceive, only one could be created; a being that is at once all-knowing, all-powerful, and wholly good would, of necessity, choose the best. That this world is in fact that best is the conclusion Leibniz thought reason compelled.

He set it out most fully in the Theodicy of 1710 — the work that gave the problem its modern name, from the Greek for the justice of God. The pressure it answers is old and blunt: if God is good and capable, why is there evil at all? Leibniz’s reply turned on what he took to be the structure of the divine choice. Goodness is not measured piece by piece but across the whole. A world without suffering, without error, without loss might be conceivable in fragments, yet not as a coherent whole containing free creatures and a lawful nature. The best world is the one richest in being and order taken together, and its apparent flaws are the cost of that richness — local shadows in a composition that is, overall, the most perfect possible. The reasoning rests on his wider metaphysics: nothing is so without a sufficient reason, and God’s reason for creating is the maximal good.

The position drew fire almost at once, and the most famous answer was not an argument but a story. Voltaire’s Candide of 1759 sent its hero through earthquake, war, disease, and betrayal in the company of the tutor Pangloss, who meets each catastrophe by insisting that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds. The phrase has carried Pangloss’s ridicule ever since, so that “Panglossian” now names a reflexive, evidence-proof optimism — a sense nearly the reverse of the careful metaphysical claim Leibniz had in mind. Whether the satire engages Leibniz’s actual reasoning or only a flattened version of it remains a matter of dispute among his readers.

Historically, the doctrine sits within the rationalist theology of the early Enlightenment, an attempt to vindicate divine providence by argument rather than by appeal to revelation alone. It also reaches back: the conviction that the cosmos is as good as it could be, and that evil is a privation or a necessary contrast rather than a positive thing, runs through Augustine and, behind him, the Platonic sense that being and goodness coincide. Leibniz gave that long intuition a precise, almost mathematical form — the world as the optimal selection from an infinity of candidates. Later philosophy has mostly declined the conclusion while continuing to wrestle with the problem it was built to solve, and the phrase survives chiefly as a byword, its original weight worn down by the joke that outlived it.

→ Related: Hexameron · Ontologism