Balaam

← Encyclopedia

Balaam son of Beor is the foreign seer of Numbers 22–24, summoned from the Euphrates by Balak, king of Moab, to lay a curse on the Israelites encamped at his border — and brought, against his employer’s intent and his own, to bless them instead. He is the rare outsider in the Book of Numbers who deals directly with Israel’s God, hears him, and obeys him, while remaining wholly outside Israel. The narrative makes no apology for the arrangement and offers no explanation of it. A man who serves other gods is the one through whom this God chooses to speak; the speech, when it comes, is exact, and it is not the speech he was paid to deliver.

The summons from the river

The frame is the wilderness itinerary of Numbers, the fourth book of the Torah and of the Pentateuch. Israel, moving north toward Canaan, has overrun the kingdoms of the Amorites and camped on the plains opposite Moab. Balak watches the encampment and is afraid of its size, and reaches not for an army but for a curse — the older weapon, in the ancient Near East, against a force too large to fight. Pethor, where his messengers go, lies far up the Euphrates; the summons travels the length of the region to fetch a specialist whose word is held to carry across distance and do work in the world. The elders of Moab arrive with the fee of divination in their hands, the customary payment for an oracle delivered to order.

What follows breaks the arrangement at every joint. Balaam puts the request to God and is told plainly to refuse: the people are blessed, and a blessing is not a thing one curses. A second embassy comes, larger and richer, and this time he is permitted to go — on the condition that he speak only the word given him. The prophecy he is to carry is therefore fixed before he sets out, and the journey is, in a sense, already decided; the drama is whether the man can be made to see what has already been settled over his head.

The donkey and the angel

On the road the angel of the Lord stands in the way with a drawn sword, and the donkey sees it. Three times she turns aside — into a field, against a wall that crushes Balaam’s foot, down into a place too narrow to pass — and three times the seer, who sees nothing, beats her for it. Then the animal is given speech and asks why she has been struck, and the Lord opens Balaam’s eyes, and only now does he see the figure that the donkey has seen all along.

The reversal is the heart of the episode and the source of its long fame. The man whose entire standing rests on sight is blind on the road, and the dumb beast beneath him is the one with vision; the gift of speech, which is the seer’s stock in trade, is handed for a moment to a donkey. Source-critical readers have long treated the donkey scene as a distinct strand, older and more folkloric than the oracles around it, stitched into the larger account; whatever its prehistory, the finished text sets it deliberately against everything Balaam is hired to be. He is the professional of the eye and the tongue, and on this road he has neither until they are returned to him. The lesson he is taught before he opens his mouth is the lesson his oracles will then state: the words are not his to govern.

Four blessings

Arriving in Moab, Balaam is taken to high places overlooking the camp, the altars are built, the sacrifices made — the apparatus of an oracle assembled to deliver a curse. Four times he opens his mouth over Israel, and four times what issues is benediction rather than malediction. Each time Balak moves him to a new vantage, hoping a different view will yield a different word, and each time the seer says only what is set in his mouth. The third and fourth oracles abandon the divinatory machinery altogether; he no longer goes looking for omens, the spirit comes upon him, and he speaks with eyes uncovered.

The fourth oracle carries the line that outran the story. A star, it says, shall come out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel. Read for centuries as the announcement of a coming king, the verse became one of the most worked-over sentences in Israel’s scriptures. The community at Qumran cited it among its collection of messianic proof-texts; the Aramaic Targum rendered the star as a king and the scepter as an anointed one outright; and in the second century of the common era Rabbi Akiva is said to have applied it to Simon bar Kosiba, the leader of the revolt against Rome, who was given the name Bar Kokhba — son of the star — on the strength of this verse. That the most enduring messianic hope of two traditions should be spoken by a foreign diviner hired to do the opposite is the deepest of the narrative’s ironies, and the text underlines it: the man can say only what is put in his mouth, and what is put there is larger than he is.

The danger God turned aside

What the figure became is more various than what the story tells. A second strand within the Bible turns sharply against him. Israel falls into apostasy at Peor, joining the worship of a foreign god and taking foreign wives, and a later passage names Balaam as the author of the counsel that engineered it: unable to curse the people from without, he is said to have taught their seduction from within, defeating by stratagem what he could not touch by oracle. He is killed in the war on Midian (Numbers 31), listed among the slain. Deuteronomy remembers him as the hireling whose curse God turned into a blessing; the book of Joshua recalls the same — naming him a diviner put to the sword — and the prophet Micah, generations later, rehearses the episode as a token of the Lord’s faithfulness: remember what Balak devised, and what Balaam answered him. In every later notice he is a danger that was disarmed, a weapon that turned in the hand that hired it.

This is the compulsion that the tradition reads as the signature of divine providence: the curse cannot land because the will behind it is not the only will at work, and the hired mouth produces, against its own intent, exactly the blessing it was paid to prevent. Balaam is the case in which the doctrine is rendered most starkly, because the instrument is so unwilling and so foreign. He resists at every stage and is overruled at every stage, and the overruling is the point.

The way, the error, the doctrine

By the New Testament the second strand has hardened into a name for a kind of corruption. Three letters use him, each fixing on a different facet. The way of Balaam is the road of the teacher who loves the wages of unrighteousness — the gift turned to profit. The error of Balaam is the greed that drove the man into hire against his better knowledge. The doctrine of Balaam is the counsel laid at his door at Peor: teaching a people to stumble, to eat what is offered to idols and to commit fornication, the seduction from within named as a teaching and condemned as one. The blessing-prophet has fallen entirely out of view; what remains is the sacred speech sold for money, and the seductive counsel sold along with it. Balaam becomes shorthand in the early communities for the insider who trades on holy things for gain — the prophet who has a price.

Sorcerer, counterpart, magus

Rabbinic tradition holds both ends of the figure at once and sharpens each. On one side the prophetic gift is granted in full: a strain of midrash makes Balaam the prophet God raised up for the nations as Moses was raised for Israel, his vision the equal of Israel’s greatest, so that the peoples of the world could never claim they had no prophet of their own. On the other side the man who held that gift is condemned without reserve. The sages of the Mishnah number him among those with no share in the world to come; the Talmud, in the tractate Sanhedrin, draws him as a sorcerer and a cynic, a diviner whose knowledge served his appetite. The two judgments are not reconciled so much as set deliberately together: the greatest of the foreign seers is also the worst of them, and the height of the gift is what makes the misuse damning. Across the literature of the Second Temple period and after, Josephus and Philo retold the episode and enlarged the Peor counsel, and the later reception, drawing the condemned diviner steadily toward the figure of the pagan magus, carried the name into demonological and magical writing — a drift treated under demonology rather than here.

A comparison the tradition itself does not make, but which the figure invites, sets Balaam beside Tiresias, the blind seer of Thebes: both are oracles whose authority rests on a sight the eye does not give, and both are bound to speak truths their hearers would rather not have heard. Tiresias is blind and sees; Balaam, on the road, is sighted and does not. The Greek figure keeps his prophetic mind even among the dead; the Hebrew one loses his vision to a donkey and recovers it only when the word is forced upon him. They mark two ways a tradition imagines the seer who cannot help but say what is true.

The seer on the wall {#research}

The figure has an existence outside the page on which he is most famous. In 1967, on an excavation at Tell Deir ʿAlla in the central Jordan Valley directed by the Dutch archaeologist Henk Franken, a workman noticed letters in ink among the rubble of a building thrown down by an earthquake. The fragments — well over a hundred pieces of plaster, written in black and red — had once formed a text displayed on a wall, and when they were pieced together they opened with a name. In the first lines, three times, stands Balaam son of Beor, called a seer of the gods, and what follows is an account of a night vision and the oracle he delivers from it: the gods gather in council, a goddess and the divine powers called the Shaddayin move to bring darkness and ruin on the world. The text is dated to around 800 BCE, written in a West Semitic dialect that is not Hebrew — its exact place between Aramaic and Canaanite is still argued — and it preserves, on a plastered wall in Transjordan, the same seer-of-Beor known to the biblical writers, attached to a vision of his own.

The standard edition is J. Hoftijzer and G. van der Kooij, Aramaic Texts from Deir ʿAlla (Brill, 1976), which assembled the fragments and produced the first full reading; the fullest English study remains Jo Ann Hackett’s The Balaam Text from Deir ʿAlla (Harvard Semitic Monographs 31, 1980), a philological analysis that established much of how the inscription is now read, reissued by Brill. For the biblical figure, Baruch A. Levine’s Numbers 21–36 in the Anchor (Yale) Bible (2000) is the major critical commentary in English, and it reads the Numbers oracles in full awareness of the Deir ʿAlla material. On the afterlife of the fourth oracle, the long history of the star of Jacob from the Masoretic text through the ancient versions to the Church Fathers is traced in a study of its interpretations in the journal Verbum Vitae; on the Jewish reading of the man, the debate over saint and sinner, the title of a well-known essay by Jacob Milgrom, gathers the rabbinic verdicts into one frame.

The wall and the page hold two readings of one name, and they do not pull apart. The Deir ʿAlla seer is a man of standing in his own country, a visionary whose words the local powers preserved in plaster against the weather — exactly the kind of figure Balak would cross the region to hire, and exactly the reputation that makes the hiring intelligible. The biblical writers took that famous foreign seer and put him in the one position his fame did not prepare him for: speaking for a God not his own, blessing where he was paid to curse, his eye opened only after a donkey had shamed it. The man of evident local fame and the man who could not govern his own mouth are the same man, seen from the two sides a border allows — and the second view is the one Israel needed him for, the foreign oracle who, brought to the edge of the camp to do harm, could do nothing but bless.

→ Related: Micah · Tiresias · Divination · Book Of Numbers · Prophecy · Divine Providence · Deuteronomy · Joshua · New Testament · Demonology · Pentateuch · Bible · Torah · Second Temple Judaism · Talmud