Atharvaveda

← Encyclopedia

Of the four Vedas the Atharvaveda comes last and stands a little apart. The Rigveda gathers the hymns of praise addressed to the gods; the Samaveda sets those verses to melody for the chanting priest; the Yajurveda supplies the muttered formulas an officiant speaks while he performs the acts of the fire sacrifice. Together these three were long reckoned the whole of revealed knowledge — the trayī vidyā, the threefold lore of the public rite. The Atharvaveda was the latecomer to that company, and it brought with it a different cargo: charms to break a fever, spells to drive off a demon or a rival, incantations for love, for safe childbirth, for a king’s victory in war, and curses meant to ruin an enemy. Its name is traditionally tied to the Atharvans, the priestly line of fire and formula whose office reaches back into a shared Indo-Iranian past — in the Iranian branch the cognate āθravan names the very priest who tends the sacred flame. Its oldest title, Ātharvāṅgirasa, joins two such lines: the Atharvans, associated with the auspicious and healing charms, and the Aṅgirasas, associated with the fiercer, hostile ones. The corpus carries both names because it carries both kinds of word.

Two strains

Its contents are commonly sorted into two strains. One is the magical and domestic material — the bhaiṣajyāni, healing charms, and the ābhicārikāni, the hostile spells — verse meant to be spoken over a sick body, a field, a threshold, an amulet. The healing charms address the ailments of an ordinary life with startling specificity: the burning fever the text calls takman, jaundice (its yellow sent away into the yellow birds and the yellow sun), the worms that gnaw a child, the leprous patch, the cough, the poison of a snake or scorpion, the bleeding of a wound. Beside them stand the charms of want and increase — for rain, for cattle, for a good harvest, for a woman’s fertility and a man’s potency, for finding a husband, for keeping a husband, for the love that draws one body toward another and the jealousy that would tear a rival away. The hostile strain is its dark twin: spells against sorcerers and the sorcery they send, against the demons that bring disease, against the enemy in battle and the rival at court, against the co-wife and the hostile kinsman. The same instrument — exact speech, fitted to a precise end — turns one way to mend and the other way to harm.

The other strain is smaller and reaches in the opposite direction. A body of speculative hymns leaves the sickbed and the threshold behind to ask after the ground of being itself — after the frame on which the world is stretched. The greatest of these is the Skambha Sūkta, the hymn of the cosmic Pillar, which takes the word skambha — the prop or support, that which holds the worlds apart — and makes of it the support of the whole, half a thing and half the soul of things, asking in which limb of the Pillar the fire glows, in which the wind moves, in which the moon measures out its journey. Other hymns deify Kāla, Time, as the first maker — Time that begot the sky and by whose stirring what is and what shall be unfold; and Prāṇa, Breath, the vital wind in which all that lives is gathered; and the Brahmacārin, the student of sacred knowledge, raised into a cosmic figure. The long Pṛthivī Sūkta, the Hymn to the Earth, addresses the ground underfoot as a goddess who bears the weight of mountain and sea and is asked to bear, kindly, the people who walk upon her — one of the oldest sustained addresses to the earth in any literature. These hymns sit in the same scroll as the charm against worms, and the proximity is not an accident of compilation; it is the measure of the corpus.

The two recensions

The collection survives in two recensions, the Śaunaka and the Paippalāda, named for the schools that carried them and differing in arrangement and in some of the text itself. The Śaunaka — long the better known in the West, and the one the great nineteenth-century editions translate — is a collection of 730 hymns, some 5,987 verses, ordered into twenty books, the kāṇḍas. Its arrangement is broadly by length: the early books gather the shorter charms, the middle books the longer hymns, with the speculative material clustering in books eight through thirteen. The later books drift toward the household and the kingdom — marriage, death, the rivalry of co-wives, the strange marginal figures called the Vrātyas who stood outside settled society, the Rohita sun raised as an emblem of royal power. Two books, the fifteenth and sixteenth, fall into prose rather than verse; the twentieth is a late annex of hymns lifted almost whole from the Rigveda for use by a particular Atharvan priest and in the riddling Kuntāpa rite of the Kuru court. The text is accented and comes down with a padapāṭha, the word-by-word analysis that the oral schools used to guard each syllable against drift.

The Paippalāda recension is the other witness, preserved chiefly in a Kashmiri birch-bark manuscript and in a living tradition in Odisha, in eastern India, that survived where the school had elsewhere died out. It too runs to twenty books, but it arranges its material differently, includes hymns the Śaunaka lacks, omits others, and reads many shared verses otherwise; it is unaccented and without the word-text apparatus. Where the two can be set side by side they correct each other, for both carry the corruptions that two and a half thousand years of transmission leave, and the older shape of a charm is often recoverable only by comparing the two lines. The recovery of the Paippalāda has been one of the slow triumphs of modern Vedic philology, lifting the Atharvaveda from a single edited text to a corpus with a textual history of its own.

The contested fourth

Within the later Indian tradition the Atharvaveda’s standing was never quite settled. Many authorities counted only three Vedas — the trayī vidyā — and the Atharvaveda’s preoccupation with sorcery, healing, and personal advantage sat uneasily beside the solemn public sacrifice of the other three, to whose great śrauta liturgy it contributed almost nothing. Where the Rigvedic hotṛ recites, the Sāmavedic udgātṛ sings, and the Yajurvedic adhvaryu performs, there was no proper office for an Atharvan in the high rite. The text was sometimes left out of the count of revelation, sometimes admitted with a qualifying note.

What carried it in was the figure of the fourth priest. The great solemn sacrifice required not only the three active officiants but a brahmán — the supervising priest who sat silent, watched the whole rite, and corrected any fault in it before it could spoil the offering, the physician of the sacrifice, as the tradition has him. To this overseeing office the Atharvan school attached its Veda: the brahmán who heals the rite needs the knowledge of healing and of expiation, and that knowledge, it argued, is the Atharvaveda. The claim is pressed in the Gopatha Brāhmaṇa, the one Brāhmaṇa the corpus possesses, which ranks the Atharvaveda first among the Vedas and binds it to the chief priest who governs them all. Modern scholarship reads the argument as a bid for status as much as a description of practice — the brahmán of the older rite was not historically an Atharvan, and the high liturgy ran without the fourth Veda — but the bid succeeded. The Atharvaveda was firmly admitted as the fourth, and came to be called the brahmaveda, the Veda of the brahmán who oversees the whole. Its divine archetype is Bṛhaspati, lord of sacred speech and chaplain to the gods, the very pattern of the priest of formula and prayer.

From charm to metaphysics

The corpus does not stop at its hymns. Attached to it, beyond the Gopatha Brāhmaṇa, are two ritual manuals: the Kauśika Sūtra, which sets the charms into their domestic and curative uses — the gestures, the materials, the moment of a remedy — and the Vaitāna Sūtra, which describes how the Atharvan priest takes his place in the solemn sacrifice. And at the far end of the same line of transmission stand three of the principal Upaniṣads, the speculative texts in which the Vedic inheritance turns from the rite outward to the self and the absolute. The Muṇḍaka, framed as a teaching passed from the seer Aṅgiras down a lineage, draws the famous division between the lower knowledge — the Vedas and their sciences — and the higher knowledge by which the imperishable is known, and gives the image of the two birds on one tree, one eating the sweet fruit and one looking on without eating. The Praśna, ascribed to the Pippalāda school, answers six questions put by six seekers, on the origin of creatures, on the powers that sustain a body, on the breath and the syllable Om. The Māṇḍūkya, shortest of all the Upaniṣads, takes that single syllable and the waking, dreaming, and dreamless states it is held to contain, and reaches past them to a fourth, unconditioned state — and it became, through the verse commentary of Gauḍapāda, a foundation stone of later nondualist Vedānta. So a corpus that opens with a charm against worms runs on, in its later strata, into the metaphysics of Brahman, the one reality behind all things.

That arc is not a contradiction the tradition felt obliged to resolve. The same conviction that powers the charm — that exact sacred speech acts directly on the real — is what carries through to the speculative hymns and the Upaniṣads. The word that drives off a fever and the word that asks after the frame of the world are the same kind of word, differently aimed.

A word on “magic”

For Western readers the Atharvaveda has held a particular fascination, since it is the nearest thing the Vedic record offers to a manual of practical magic — words made to act directly on the body and the world, and so a natural point of comparison for the talisman and the amulet of other traditions, and for the arts of divination. That description is the modern reader’s, and it can mislead. What the tradition transmitted was sacred speech, indistinct from prayer, not a separate craft of “magic” set against religion. The very ailments the charms treat are healed by the same priest, with the same kind of word, that consecrates a marriage and oversees the great sacrifice; the line later drawn between religion and magic — the one solemn and licit, the other suspect and low — is a category brought to the text from outside, not one the text knew. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship, reaching the corpus through the lens of Frazerian theories of “primitive magic,” often read it as the crude underside of Vedic religion; later study has dismantled that frame and restored the Atharvaveda as the everyday register of a single ritual world, in which the healer’s charm, the king’s victory-spell, and the hymn to the cosmic Pillar are continuous acts of effective speech. It is also, read straight, one of the oldest records of Indian medicine: its bhaiṣajya hymns name diseases, symptoms, and herbal remedies that the later medical literature would gather and systematize, so that the history of Hinduism’s healing arts begins in part among these charms.

The corpus belongs, with its three siblings, to the oldest stratum of Sanskrit literature. The philologist Michael Witzel places its composition at or shortly after the close of the Rigvedic age, around the start of the first millennium BCE — early in the Indian Iron Age, when the Vedic peoples had moved east into the Gangetic plain and the world of settled kingdoms the later books reflect was taking shape. Its gods are largely those of the Rigveda — Agni the fire, Indra the storm-king, Varuṇa the keeper of cosmic order, Soma the pressed draught that is at once plant and deity — but pressed now into the service of the household and the body rather than the great public altar. The later epic and devotional literature of India, the Mahābhārata and the Bhagavad Gita among them, would build on the authority of the four-Veda corpus while moving far from its concerns; the Atharvaveda remained the strangest and most concrete of the four, the one that kept the smell of the sickroom and the field.

Texts, editions, and scholarship

The standard complete scholarly translation is William Dwight Whitney’s Atharva-Veda Saṃhitā, left unfinished at his death in 1894 and brought to completion and through the press by his pupil Charles Rockwell Lanman as volumes seven and eight of the Harvard Oriental Series in 1905 — a literal rendering of the Śaunaka recension wrapped in a dense critical and exegetical commentary that remains the reference apparatus for the text. Whitney’s edition is hosted in full at Wikisource, in the same Harvard Oriental Series in which Lanman issued it. The earlier selective translation, Maurice Bloomfield’s Hymns of the Atharva-Veda (Sacred Books of the East, volume 42, Oxford, 1897), renders a generous choice of the charms and speculative hymns together with the relevant portions of the Kauśika Sūtra, and remains the most readable scholarly way into the material; the complete verse rendering, more accessible if less exact, is Ralph T. H. Griffith’s The Hymns of the Atharvaveda (Benares, 1895–96). Behind all of these stands the foundational nineteenth-century edition of the Sanskrit text by Rudolf Roth and Whitney (Berlin, 1856), the editio princeps that first put the Atharvaveda before European scholarship.

The modern scholarly landscape is shaped by three developments. The recovery and critical editing of the Paippalāda recension — from Leroy Carr Barret’s early books to the ongoing collaborative editions drawing on the Odisha tradition — has given the text a second witness and a real textual history. The study of the Atharvaveda as a document of early Indian medicine, above all in Kenneth Zysk’s work on the bhaiṣajya charms, has displaced the old reading of the healing material as mere superstition. And Patrick Olivelle’s critical edition of the early Upaniṣads (Oxford, 1998) has reset the philology of the Muṇḍaka, Praśna, and Māṇḍūkya that the corpus carries at its speculative end. Running through all of it is the reassessment of the religion-and-magic distinction itself, which a generation of scholars has argued says more about the categories of the modern study of religion than about the text — a corrective set out, among other places, in the critical literature on the religion and philosophy of the Atharvaveda. The Veda’s later speculative strata are read most directly through the Upaniṣads in Müller’s translation, which gathers the principal texts in the Sacred Books of the East.

What it preserves, with unusual frankness, is the everyday register of an ancient ritual world — the fears it answered and the hopes it carried, set down in the same breath as its hymns on the order of all things.

→ In the library: The Upanishads (Müller, 1884) — later Vedic scripture

→ Related: Talisman · Divination · Rigveda · Samaveda · Yajurveda · Soma · Brahman · Indra · Agni · Varuna · Brihaspati · Hinduism · Mahabharata · Bhagavad Gita · Amulet