Arius

← Encyclopedia

Arius (c. 256–336) was a presbyter of the church at Alexandria whose teaching about the status of Christ touched off the longest and most consequential doctrinal dispute of the early church. At issue was a single question, framed in the technical vocabulary of Greek philosophy: whether the Son was of the same eternal substance as God the Father, or a being whom the Father had brought into existence. Arius held the second answer, and from his name the whole controversy and the position itself took the label “Arianism” — a name fixed largely by the side that defeated him.

What Arius himself taught has to be reconstructed from fragments, since most of his writings were destroyed after his condemnation and survive only in quotations preserved by his opponents. The core of it is clear enough. He maintained that God the Father alone is uncreated, without beginning, and strictly unique; that the Son, though the first and highest of all creatures and the agent through whom everything else was made, was nonetheless created, and so belonged to the order of made things rather than to the being of God. The phrase attributed to him — that “there was when he was not” — captured the sticking point: if the Son was begotten, Arius reasoned, there must have been a prior state in which he did not yet exist. His concern was to guard the absolute oneness and transcendence of God, a priority he shared with much of the philosophical theology of his age.

The reaction was fierce. His bishop, Alexander of Alexandria, condemned him around 318, and the quarrel spread through the eastern churches with enough force that the emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 partly to settle it. The council ruled against Arius, declaring the Son homoousios — of one substance — with the Father, the word that anchors the Nicene Creed. Arius was exiled, though the controversy was far from over: for much of the fourth century various forms of subordinationist theology held imperial favour, and the Nicene position triumphed only gradually, through the work of later defenders such as Athanasius. Arius died in Constantinople in 336.

Historically, the dispute is significant well beyond its outcome. It forced the church to commit, in binding language, to a definition of the relation between Father and Son, and in doing so it shaped the doctrine of the Trinity that became standard in Christianity. The label has outlived the man: later movements that denied the full divinity of Christ, from certain Reformation-era groups to some modern ones, have been called “Arian” by their critics, often with little direct connection to what the Alexandrian presbyter actually argued. The historical Arius remains a partly obscured figure, known mostly through the words of those who set out to refute him.

→ Related: Logos · Docetism