Angelus Silesius

← Encyclopedia

Angelus Silesius was the pen name of Johann Scheffler (1624–1677), a German physician turned Catholic priest whose short, paradoxical verse couplets gave the mystical tradition of union with God one of its most quotable and most unsettling forms. The name he chose — the Silesian messenger, or angel — marked both his homeland and the office he came to claim for his poetry.

He was born in Breslau, in Silesia, and raised Lutheran. He studied medicine at Strasbourg, Leiden, and Padua, took a doctorate, and entered service as a court physician. The decisive turn came inward and then outward: drawn to the German mystical writers — Meister Eckhart, Johannes Tauler, and above all the shoemaker- visionary Jacob Böhme — he found their language at odds with the Lutheran orthodoxy around him, and in 1653 he converted to Catholicism, taking the name under which he would write. He was ordained a priest in 1661. The same man who wrote the most rarefied mystical epigrams of the century spent his later years as a combative pamphleteer for the Counter-Reformation, a pairing his readers have puzzled over ever since.

His reputation rests on one book. The Geistreiche Sinn- und Schlußreime of 1657, reissued as the Cherubinischer Wandersmann — the Cherubinic Wanderer — collects more than a thousand rhymed couplets, most in a single pair of lines, each turning on a paradox about God, the soul, and the nothing that joins them. They say things that sound, taken alone, close to heresy: that God needs the soul as the soul needs God, that the eye with which one sees God is the same eye with which God sees, that the seeker must become what they seek. A companion volume of hymn-like devotional verse, the Heilige Seelenlust, supplied texts still sung in German churches.

Scholars have long debated how far the Cherubinic Wanderer tips toward pantheism, and how much it simply restates, in compressed form, the negative theology that runs from the Neoplatonists through Eckhart: the claim that God is beyond being and name, reached not by addition but by stripping away. Silesius worked at the edge where that tradition’s grammar — union, indwelling, the divine spark — strains against the doctrine of a creator distinct from creation, and he seems to have known it; he furnished the couplets with prefaces insisting they be read in an orthodox sense. Whether the verse can be held there is the question his readers keep returning to.

The afterlife of the book outran its author. The most famous of the couplets — that the rose blooms without why, blooming because it blooms, heedless of being seen — was taken up by later German thought as a near-perfect statement of a thing existing wholly for its own sake. Pietists, Romantics, and twentieth- century philosophers each found their own use for the lines. A devotional poet of the Catholic Reformation became, by a route he would not have chosen, a fixture of the European meditation on what it means for anything to be at all.

→ Related: Thomas Vaughan · William Blake · Neoplatonism · Gnosis