Agnosticism

← Encyclopedia

Agnosticism is the position that the existence and nature of the divine lie beyond what can be known — not denied, as the atheist denies, but held to be inaccessible to evidence and proof. The word names a stance toward knowledge itself before it names any stance toward God.

The term was minted in 1869 by the English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, in the circle of London thinkers that became the Metaphysical Society. By his own account he wanted a label for his own footing among men who were all confident of some creed or other, and he built it as an opposite. The early Church had its gnostics — those who professed to know the unseen things, the origin of the cosmos and the soul’s fate. Huxley took their name, prefixed the Greek alpha of negation, and called himself the one who did not know and held that such matters could not be settled. The coinage is therefore an exact mirror of gnosis: where the Gnostic claimed a knowing that saved, Huxley claimed a principled not-knowing, and made of it a discipline.

That discipline, in his telling, was less a doctrine than a rule of method: follow reason as far as it reaches, and refuse to pretend conclusions where the evidence gives none. On this account agnosticism is not a soft halfway house between faith and denial but a demand applied evenly to both — a person may not assert the existence of God without warrant, and may not assert the non-existence either. Later writers loosened the word toward simple uncertainty or indifference, a drift Huxley would not have welcomed.

Two distinctions keep the term from blurring. The first separates agnosticism from atheism: the atheist makes a claim about reality, that no god exists; the agnostic makes a claim about knowledge, that the question cannot be answered. The second runs within agnosticism itself, between holding the divine merely unknown for now and holding it unknowable in principle — the difference between a verdict that more inquiry might overturn and one that rules inquiry out from the start. Much disagreement labelled “agnostic” turns out to be disagreement over which of these is meant.

The position bears on the material this encyclopedia gathers in a pointed way. The traditions treated here are, for the most part, traditions of gnosis in the older sense — Hermetic, Platonist, mystical currents that hold direct acquaintance with the divine to be both possible and the whole point. Huxley’s word was framed as the refusal of precisely that confidence, and the verbal kinship is not accidental: agnosticism is the modern shadow thrown by an ancient claim to know. Whether the limit it draws is a sober honesty about reason or a premature foreclosure of experience is the question the older traditions and the word’s inventor answer in opposite directions.

→ Related: Gnosis · Apologetics · Nous