Adam

← Encyclopedia

Adam is the first human being in the Hebrew Bible — formed, in the second creation account of Genesis, from the dust of the ground and the breath of God, and named with the Hebrew word for man, which is also the word for humankind. The story that follows is brief and consequential: a garden, a single prohibition, the eating of the fruit, and expulsion into a world of labor and death. From those few chapters three religions and a whole speculative underworld built very different figures, and the same name carries all of them — the literal patriarch of the lineage that runs to Noah, the theological hinge of Pauline Christianity, the first prophet of Islam, and the cosmic Man of the mystics.

The man of the garden

The Book of Genesis tells the creation of humanity twice, and the two tellings do not agree in their details. In the first chapter, God makes humankind — male and female together — in the divine image and likeness, on the sixth day, as the culmination of a measured cosmos. In the second chapter the camera draws close: the Lord God forms adam from the adamah, the dust of the soil, breathes into his nostrils the breath of life, and sets him in a planted garden eastward in Eden to work it and keep it. The wordplay is the whole point — the earthling is made of earth, and his name is a pun on the ground he is taken from and will return to. He is given everything but one tree, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, on pain of death.

Then come the events that fix Adam in memory. He names the animals, exercising a dominion that is also an act of language, and finding among them no fit companion. From his side God builds the woman, whom he greets as bone of his bone; she is later named Eve, the mother of all living. The serpent, subtlest of the creatures, persuades the woman that the forbidden tree will open the eyes rather than bring death; she eats and gives to the man, and their eyes are indeed opened — to their own nakedness first of all. What the older theology calls the Fall follows: the curses on serpent, woman, and ground; the labor of childbirth and the labor of the field; the expulsion eastward, with cherubim and a turning sword set to guard the way back to the tree of life. Outside the garden the human story properly begins. Adam and Eve have Cain and Abel, and when the elder kills the younger, a third son, Seth, is born to carry the line that Genesis follows through Enosh and Enoch to Noah. Adam, the text records, lived nine hundred and thirty years and died, the first death in a book that had promised death as the price of the fruit.

Read at the surface, the narrative is the etiology of the human condition — why people work, suffer, bear children in pain, and die. But adam is both a proper name and a common noun, and the older Jewish reading kept that doubleness alive: Adam is an individual who disobeyed, and also the pattern of every person after him, the human creature told once, in one body, standing in for the species. He is less a biography than a diagnosis.

Adam in Jewish tradition

Around the spare chapters of Genesis, Jewish interpretation built an enormous secondary literature. The rabbis of the Talmud and the midrash worried at every silence in the text — what the forbidden fruit was, how large the first man had been, whether he was created androgynous and later divided, what light he gave off before the Fall. A recurring rabbinic image makes Adam a giant of cosmic proportions, his body filling the world from end to end and diminished only after his sin, so that the first man becomes a measure of what humanity lost.

A whole genre of Second Temple and later pseudepigraphic writing took Adam as its subject. The Life of Adam and Eve, preserved in a Latin recension and in a Greek version known as the Apocalypse of Moses, expands the after-Eden story: Adam and Eve attempt penance by standing in the rivers — Adam in the Jordan, Eve in the Tigris — until Satan, disguised as an angel of light, deceives Eve a second time into abandoning hers. The work, composed in the orbit of first-century Judaism, supplies the motifs of Adam’s repentance, his deathbed vision, and his burial that would feed both Jewish and Christian legend for centuries. The same period that produced the Book of Enoch gave Adam this rich apocryphal afterlife, in which the first man is no longer a cautionary tale but a figure of loss, longing, and the promise of eventual restoration.

The first Adam and the last: Paul’s typology

Christian thought sharpened the corporate reading into doctrine, and it did so through the apostle Paul. For Paul, Adam is not chiefly the sinner of Eden but a representative man, the head under whom the whole race stands, and his counterpart is Christ. In the fifteenth chapter of First Corinthians, Paul sets the two in flat opposition: as in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive; the first man Adam became a living being, the last Adam a life-giving spirit; the first man is of the earth and made of dust, the second man is from heaven. Adam is the protological man, the beginning; Christ is the eschatological man, the end — and the second answers and undoes the first.

The argument is developed at greater length in the fifth chapter of Romans, the single most consequential page Adam ever generated. There Paul reasons that through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, so that death spread to all; and that by the obedience of one man the many are set right, as by the disobedience of one man the many were made sinners. Adam, he writes, is a type — typos, a stamp or pattern — of the one who was to come. From this compressed parallel the Western church built its doctrine of original sin: the inherited flaw transmitted from the first parents, which baptism answers. Augustine gave that doctrine its classic and severe form in the early fifth century, reading the solidarity of the race in Adam as a real inheritance of guilt and not merely of bad example; the Eastern churches developed a gentler account, emphasizing the inheritance of mortality and corruption rather than of guilt. Already in the second century Irenaeus had framed the relation as recapitulation — Christ as the new Adam retracing and reversing the steps of the old, recovering in himself the image and likeness of God that the first Adam had forfeited, so that the cross answers the tree and obedience answers disobedience point for point. The first Adam and the last Adam became a fixed and load-bearing pair, the axis on which the whole Christian story of fall and redemption turns.

Adam the prophet in Islam

The Qur’an receives Adam and recasts him. He is the first human and the first of the prophets, the beginning of the line that runs through Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, and his story is told not once but in several places, each adding a facet. In the second sura, al-Baqarah, God announces to the angels that He will set on the earth a khalifa, a successor or vicegerent; the angels question the wisdom of placing there one who will shed blood, and God answers that He knows what they do not. He then teaches Adam the names of all things and challenges the angels to repeat them; they cannot, and Adam can — a knowledge that establishes the human creature’s dignity and his fitness to be God’s deputy on earth. There is no forbidden fruit of knowledge here; in the Islamic telling knowledge is the gift, not the transgression.

The drama that follows is the prostration. God commands the angels to bow down before Adam, and all of them do — except Iblis, who refuses out of pride. In al-A’raf the text is plain: God created and shaped the human being, then told the angels to prostrate before Adam, and they all did so but Iblis, who would not bow with the rest. His reason, given in the same passage and again in Sad and al-Hijr, is a claim of rank: he was made of fire and Adam of clay, and fire does not bow to mud. For that refusal Iblis is cast out and becomes the adversary, granted respite until the appointed Day and vowing to lead Adam’s children astray. He tempts Adam and his spouse to the tree; they slip, and their nakedness becomes apparent to them, and they are sent down to the earth. But the Qur’anic Adam, crucially, repents and is forgiven — he receives words from his Lord and is restored — so that there is no doctrine of an inherited fallen nature in Islam, no original sin transmitted down the generations. Adam falls, turns back, is taught, and goes on as a prophet. The lapse is personal, answered by mercy, and closed.

The Anthropos: the heavenly Man

A different Adam appears in the speculative currents of late antiquity, where the Genesis figure dissolves into a cosmic principle. Hermetic and Gnostic writers spoke of an Anthropos, a primal or heavenly Man who exists before the earthly one — a luminous archetype, often the divine mind’s own reflection, who descends into matter and is bound there. The opening treatise of the Corpus Hermeticum, the Poimandres, tells exactly such a story. The All-Father Mind, in G. R. S. Mead’s translation hosted in the Library here, brings forth a Man “co-equal to Himself,” beautiful beyond compare, “the Image of his Sire”; this Man, given authority over the spheres of the planets, breaks through the cosmic framework and shows his shining form downward to Nature, who sees his reflection on her water and his shadow on her earth and conceives a longing for him. The Man, in turn, beholds his own likeness in the depths and loves it, wills to dwell there, and descends — and so the earthly human comes to be twofold: mortal in body through the descent, immortal through the essential Man within. The Hermetic Fall is thus a fall by love rather than by disobedience, a descent undertaken with the divine blessing rather than against a command — a mirror image of Eden, where the same downward motion carries the opposite moral charge.

The Gnostic systems multiplied this primal Man into whole genealogies. In the Sethian texts recovered at Nag Hammadi, there is a heavenly Adamas, the incorruptible Man above, whose earthly namesake is fashioned by the lower and ignorant maker of the world — so that the Adam of Genesis is the captured image, a spark of the higher light imprisoned in a body of clay molded by a god who is not the highest God. On this reading the human task is precisely to recover what was lost in the descent: to awaken the divine Adam sleeping within the earthly one. The frame inverts the biblical valuations — the creator who forbade the tree becomes a jealous lesser power, and the serpent who opened the eyes becomes a messenger of saving knowledge. Underlying all of it is the older speculation of Philo of Alexandria, who, reading the two creation accounts of Genesis through Platonic eyes, had already distinguished a heavenly archetypal man made after the divine image from the earthly molded man of the second chapter — a distinction that the Neoplatonic and Gnostic schools would carry far beyond anything Philo intended.

Adam Kadmon: the primordial Man of Kabbalah

Kabbalah developed the most elaborate version of the cosmic Adam. There the teaching is of Adam Kadmon, primordial Man: not the creature of Eden but the first configuration to emerge from the hidden God, the form through which the divine attributes — the sefirot — first take ordered shape. The verse that licenses the whole doctrine is Genesis 1:26, “let us make adam in our image,” read as describing a supernal Man distinct from the man of dust. The term itself first surfaces in an early thirteenth-century treatise, and in the Zohar the figure becomes the adam di-l’ela, the Man above, whose body is the diagram of the godhead. In the Lurianic system of the sixteenth century the doctrine reaches its full development: after the contraction of the light of Ein-Sof, the Infinite, into the primeval space, Adam Kadmon is the first emanation to fill that void, ranking above the four worlds of emanation, creation, formation, and making, with the sefirot streaming out from the orifices of his head. On this account the human form is read upward, as the blueprint of all reality, so that the body of Adam Kadmon maps the structure of being itself. The earthly Adam becomes a faint copy of this cosmic one, and his fall a rupture felt at every level — the detailed working-out of which belongs to the entries on Kabbalah and the Ein-Sof.

Scholarship and the textual tradition

The modern study of Adam runs along the seams between these traditions. The critical text of the Greek and Latin Life of Adam and Eve assembled by Gary Anderson and Michael Stone, A Synopsis of the Books of Adam and Eve (2nd revised ed., Scholars Press for the Society of Biblical Literature, 1999), sets the Adam pseudepigrapha out in parallel columns and underlies most current work on the figure’s Second Temple afterlife; the dossier of the pseudepigraphon itself, with its first-century dating and its several recensions, is conveniently gathered at earlyjewishwritings.com. On the Pauline typology, John VanMaaren’s Tyndale Bulletin study of the Adam-Christ typology in Paul and its development in the early church fathers argues that the patristic recapitulation doctrine derives directly from Paul’s first/last-Adam contrast in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 (tyndalebulletin.org), while Felipe deJesús Legarreta-Castillo’s The Figure of Adam in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15: The New Creation and Its Ethical and Social Reconfiguration (Fortress Press, 2014) sets Paul’s contrast within the wider Jewish interpretive discussion of Adam (fortresspress.com). For the esoteric Adam, Gershom Scholem’s article “Adam Kadmon” in the Encyclopaedia Judaica remains the standard orientation, tracing the term from its thirteenth-century origin through the Zohar to the Lurianic system (jewishvirtuallibrary.org), and Bentley Layton’s The Gnostic Scriptures (1987) supplies the critical translations of the Sethian Adam material from Nag Hammadi. The Hermetic Anthropos can be read in the primary source itself: the Poimandres, in Mead’s translation, is hosted here in the Library, and the Christianizing Latin Kabbalah through which Adam Kadmon first reached the Renaissance West survives in Mathers’ translation of the Kabbala Denudata, where Knorr von Rosenroth had read the primordial Man as a figure of Christ.

These are not the same idea, and the traditions would not have recognized one another’s Adam as their own. The patriarch of the genealogies, the type of the sinner whom Christ undoes, the forgiven first prophet, the captured spark of light, the cosmic diagram of the godhead — each is a coherent figure within its own frame, and the frames pull in incompatible directions on the very questions that matter most, whether the first man’s lapse is inherited, whether his descent was a crime or a gift, whether his body is a tomb or a temple. A single intuition nonetheless recurs beneath the divergence: that the first man is less a person than a pattern, and that what happened to him is, in some sense, still under way in everyone who bears his name — which, the Hebrew insists, is everyone.

→ In the library: Mathers — The Kabbalah Unveiled (1887) · The Corpus Hermeticum (Mead) — I. Poemandres

→ Related: Gnosis · Emanation · Leviticus · Hermes Trismegistus · Cain · Seth · Garden Of Eden · Paul The Apostle · Islam · Kabbalah · Ein Sof