1 Maccabees

← Encyclopedia

First Maccabees is a Jewish historical narrative of the revolt that broke out in Judea under Seleucid rule in the 160s BCE, covering the persecution of the Jews under Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the guerrilla war led by the priestly family of the Maccabees, and the founding of the Hasmonean dynasty that followed. It is counted as scripture by the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, placed among the apocrypha by Protestants, and is not part of the Hebrew Bible. Its sixteen chapters run from the accession of Antiochus IV in 175 BCE to the death of Simon and the accession of his son John Hyrcanus in 134 BCE — a single dynastic generation, told as a continuous chronicle, with a year-count reckoned by the Seleucid era that frames each campaign as a dated event in a larger imperial time.

The desecration

The book opens with the long shadow of Alexander and his successors — the Hellenistic world of warring Greek kingdoms out of which the Seleucid empire grew — then turns to Antiochus IV outlawing the practice of Judaism. The measures are cataloged with a chronicler’s flatness: the circumcision of infants forbidden on pain of death, the Sabbath and the festivals abolished, copies of the Law torn up and burned, the Temple on the Temple Mount plundered of its gold and its furnishings and then rededicated to Olympian Zeus. On the twenty-fifth of the month Kislev, the narrator records, the king’s officers built a desolating sacrilege upon the altar of burnt offering and set up altars in the towns of Judah, and swine and unclean beasts were offered where the daily sacrifice had stood. Mothers who circumcised their children were killed with the infants hung from their necks. Those who refused to eat the sacrificial meat or to sacrifice were put to death. This is the same persecution that the apocalyptic visions of the Book of Daniel encode as the abomination that makes desolate, and First Maccabees and Daniel are the two contemporary Judean witnesses to it — but where Daniel answers terror with sealed visions of the end of days, First Maccabees answers it with men taking up arms. The desecration is the hinge of the whole book: everything before it is provocation, everything after it is response.

The hammer and his brothers

Resistance gathers around the priest Mattathias of the village of Modein, who refuses the king’s command to sacrifice, kills both the apostate Jew who steps forward to obey and the royal officer who compels him, tears down the altar, and flees to the hills crying that whoever is zealous for the Law and stands by the covenant should follow him. The act recalls the zeal of Phinehas in the Torah, and the book means the echo: it is casting the revolt as a renewal of an old covenantal pattern rather than an innovation. A hard early decision belongs to this phase. A band of the pious is slaughtered in their caves on a Sabbath because they will not lift a hand to defend themselves on the holy day; Mattathias and his followers resolve that they will fight if attacked on the Sabbath, lest they all perish — a ruling the narrator presents not as a relaxation of the Law but as its preservation.

Mattathias dies early, having charged his sons, and the war passes to the third of them, Judas, called Maccabeus — a byname most often glossed as the hammer, from a Hebrew or Aramaic root for a mallet or smith’s hammer, though the etymology is debated. The middle chapters are a campaign chronicle: Judas defeats the Seleucid generals Apollonius and Seron, then the larger forces of Gorgias and Lysias, in a sequence of victories won by speed, terrain, and surprise against heavier armies. With the country partly cleared he marches on Jerusalem, finds the sanctuary desolate, the altar profaned, the gates burned and weeds growing in the courts, and the men tear their garments and mourn. They pull down the defiled altar, store its stones in a fit place on the Temple hill to await a prophet who will say what to do with them, build a new altar of unhewn stones, and rekindle the worship. The dedication of the purified Temple in 164 BCE — three years to the day after the desolation, on the twenty-fifth of Kislev — is celebrated for eight days with sacrifice, song, and the relighting of the lamps; Judas and the assembly decree that the days of the dedication be kept yearly. This is the festival later called Hanukkah, whose anniversary First Maccabees grounds, though the book gives no observance and none of the later domestic ritual.

Judas falls in battle against a Seleucid army at Elasa, abandoned by most of his men, and the war continues under his brothers. Jonathan, the diplomat of the family, plays the rival Seleucid claimants against one another, is appointed high priest by a king who needs his support, and is eventually taken and killed by treachery. Simon, the last surviving son, secures from the Seleucid Demetrius II a remission of tribute that the book reads as the moment the yoke of the Gentiles is lifted from Israel — effective independence, dated by the narrator to 142 BCE. A great assembly then confirms Simon and his descendants as high priest, governor, and ethnarch until a trustworthy prophet should arise — a careful phrasing that makes the office hereditary while leaving the door of prophecy formally open, and that quietly concedes the family has no prophetic mandate of its own. Simon is murdered, with two of his sons, by his own son-in-law in a fortress near Jericho; the surviving son, John Hyrcanus, succeeds him, and on that succession the book ends. The narrative thus closes exactly where the Hasmonean priest-kingship is secured and dynastically settled — the point its author had reason to reach.

A book to legitimate a dynasty

Scholars place the composition late in the second century BCE, most often during or just after the reign of John Hyrcanus, whose accession is the book’s final event and whose further deeds are pointed to but not narrated — the standard sign that the author wrote under or just after him. The work reads throughout as written to legitimate Hasmonean rule. It presents the family as the divinely favored deliverers of Israel, fuses the high priesthood with civil and military authority in their line, and quotes a series of official documents — Seleucid royal letters, a treaty with Rome, correspondence with Sparta claiming a shared ancestry — that frame the new state as a recognized member of the Mediterranean order of nations. The Roman treaty in chapter eight and the renewals under Jonathan and Simon are the most studied of these. Most scholars regard the embedded documents as substantially authentic in form, drawn from Hasmonean archives, even where the historian has shaped their setting; they are among the earliest such diplomatic texts preserved in Jewish literature, and the long debate over their reliability is itself a measure of how documentary the book is. The correspondence with Sparta is the strangest of them: a letter claiming the Jews and the Spartans are kin, descended from a common ancestor in Abraham, traded between Jonathan and the Spartan state. Whether the exchange is historical or a piece of Hellenistic kinship-diplomacy elaborated by the author, its function in the book is the same — to set the new Judean polity among the recognized peoples of the wider world, corresponding as an equal with a famous Greek city, rather than as a rebel province of a crumbling empire.

The praise-poem to Simon in chapter fourteen is the clearest tell. It describes a reign of peace under the vine and the fig tree, the land secure and the sanctuary glorious, in the cadence of the prophets and the psalms — the language of a restored Davidic golden age transferred to a priestly house that was not of David’s line and had no traditional claim to kingship at all. That transfer is the book’s political work: to clothe a new kind of ruler, a warrior high priest, in the inherited vocabulary of legitimate Israelite rule.

The reticent register

The book’s religious temper is distinctive, and it is the feature that most sets it apart within Second Temple literature. God is never named directly in it — not as the LORD, not as God; the text reaches instead for Heaven, for circumlocutions such as the one who saves Israel and help that comes from Heaven, for the passive voice that lets a victory arrive without a stated agent. And it contains no overt miracles, no angelic armies, no visions, no doctrine of the resurrection of the dead of the kind 2 Maccabees makes central. Deliverance comes through fidelity to the Law and through arms; the heroes are zealots for the covenant who fight rather than wait, and victory is won by generalship and nerve rather than by wonder. Even the great recovery of the Temple is narrated as an achievement of disciplined men, not as a divine intervention.

That reserve has been read in several ways. It marks the book as the product of a priestly, perhaps proto-Sadducean milieu close to the Hasmonean court, a world for which the resurrection hopes and angelic apparatus of the apocalyptic stream were not the natural idiom. It can be read as a literary stance modeled on the older historical books of the Hebrew canon — Judges, Samuel, Kings — where providence governs events through human agents and the narrator credits outcomes to fidelity rather than to portents. And it answers, point for point, the very different telling in 2 Maccabees, which covers part of the same years in a heightened, overtly theological register full of heavenly horsemen, miracles, martyrs who testify to the resurrection, and an explicit theology of sin and chastisement. The two books are the classic contrast within Second Temple Judaism: one a dynastic chronicle that credits the Hasmoneans’ success to faithful action under an unnamed providence, the other a moral and martyrological history that reads the same events as the direct discipline and rescue of God. First Maccabees is the sober one — and its sobriety is not the absence of a theology but a theology of its own, in which Heaven works through the Law kept and the sword drawn.

Text, transmission, and scholarship

The book survives in Greek, as part of the Septuagint, and reaches the modern reader through the great uncial codices — Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Venetus — and their descendants. But its Greek is so saturated with the syntax and idiom of biblical Hebrew, full of Hebraisms and constructions that read like a translation, that the long scholarly consensus holds it was composed in Hebrew and rendered into Greek early; the Hebrew original is lost, with no trace of its use by any later writer. Jerome, in the fourth century, reports having seen or known a Hebrew First Maccabees, distinguishing it from the natively Greek Second; and Origen, in the third, preserves a transliterated Hebrew or Aramaic title for it, Sarbeth Sarbanael, whose sense is uncertain — read by various scholars as something like the book of the dynasty of the resisters of God, or the prince of the house of Israel, but corrupt enough in transmission that no single reconstruction commands assent. Josephus, writing his Antiquities in the first century CE, drew on First Maccabees for the early Hasmonean period and is the principal independent witness to the events it narrates, which makes the two texts the foundation of any modern reconstruction of the revolt.

On the question of historical worth, the modern judgment is that First Maccabees is among the most reliable narrative sources for any episode of the Second Temple era — annalistic, soberly chronological, restrained in its rhetoric, and anchored to embedded documents — even as its pro-Hasmonean shaping must be discounted at every turn. The standard critical edition and commentary in English is Jonathan A. Goldstein’s I Maccabees in the Anchor Bible (1976), which set the terms of debate over the book’s sources, date, and tendency; it has been succeeded by Daniel R. Schwartz’s 1 Maccabees in the Anchor Yale Bible (2022), the current full-scale commentary. The reliability and provenance of the diplomatic documents remain a live area of study; on the Roman treaty of chapter eight, Duncan E. MacRae’s Reading the Roman-Jewish treaty in 1 Maccabees 8 reads the embedded document as a deliberate feature of the book’s Hellenistic historical culture rather than a clumsy interpolation. The Greek text is freely consultable in bilingual editions of the Septuagint, and the standard early-twentieth-century English apparatus, with introduction and notes, is the version edited by R. H. Charles in The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament (1913).

What the book bequeathed

For later tradition the book’s most living bequest is the festival it grounds. The eight-day rededication it reports became the Jewish feast of Hanukkah, whose familiar miracle of the single cruse of consecrated oil burning eight days belongs not to this text — which knows only an eight-day celebration and a relit lamp — but to much later rabbinic sources, where the wonder of the oil is supplied centuries after the event. The canonical fate of the book is its other long afterlife: held as scripture by Rome and the Eastern churches, set among the Apocrypha by the Reformers and printed apart or dropped from Protestant Bibles, and never received into the Hebrew canon at all, so that the only Jewish history of the Maccabean revolt survives as Christian scripture and Jewish memory keeps the festival without the book. The book itself records a victory, a cleansing, and a dynasty — and a people that chose to fight for the right to keep its own law.

→ In the library: Charles — The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament (1913)

→ Related: 2 Maccabees · Apocrypha · Book Of Daniel · Second Temple Judaism · Hellenistic Period · Old Testament · Flavius Josephus · Temple Mount